Religious Orientation, Racial Prejudice, and Dogmatism: A Study of Baptists and Unitarians

1972 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonnie R. Strickland ◽  
Sallie Cone Weddell
Keyword(s):  
Religious Orientation ◽  
Racial Prejudice

Religious orientation and overt versus covert racial prejudice.

1986 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Daniel Batson ◽  
Cheryl H. Flink ◽  
Patricia A. Schoenrade ◽  
Jim Fultz ◽  
Virginia Pych
Keyword(s):  
Religious Orientation ◽  
Racial Prejudice

Social Desirability, Religious Orientation, and Racial Prejudice

1978 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 31 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Daniel Batson ◽  
Stephen J. Naifeh ◽  
Suzanne Pate
Keyword(s):  
Social Desirability ◽  
Religious Orientation ◽  
Racial Prejudice

Religious Fundamentalism, Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Prejudice

1992 ◽  
Vol 71 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1291-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Wylie ◽  
James Forest
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Religious Orientation ◽  
Racial Prejudice ◽  
Demographic Variables ◽  
Religious Fundamentalism ◽  
Clear Relationship ◽  
Right Wing ◽  
Right Wing Authoritarianism ◽  
Theoretical Predictions ◽  
Standard Regression

Prior research has not yielded a clear relationship between religious orientation and prejudice in spite of theoretical predictions. It was hypothesized that authoritarianism and religious fundamentalism would be positively associated with ethnic and racial prejudice, hostility towards homosexuals, and punitiveness in prison sentencing. Questionnaires measuring these variables and 12 demographic variables were mailed to 285 Manitoba voters, of whom 75 responded. Correlational and standard regression analysis confirmed that for this sample scores on authoritarianism and religious fundamentalism were positively correlated, with scores on authoritarianism significantly related to those on ethnic and racial prejudice, and punitiveness. Stepwise analysis suggested that the most important factor was authoritarianism although certain demographic variables were predictive as well.

Racial Prejudice Predicts Less Desire to Learn About White Privilege

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 310-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
John G. Conway ◽  
Nikolette P. Lipsey ◽  
Gabrielle Pogge ◽  
Kate A. Ratliff
Keyword(s):  
White Privilege ◽  
Racial Prejudice ◽  
Affective Responses ◽  
White People ◽  
Total N ◽  
Desire To Change

Abstract. White people often experience unpleasant emotions in response to learning about White privilege ( Phillips & Lowery, 2015 ; Pinterits, Poteat, & Spanierman, 2009 ). Two studies (total N = 1,310) examined how race attitudes relate to White people’s desires to avoid or learn information about White privilege. White participants completed measures of their race attitudes, desire to change White privilege, and their desire to avoid learning information about White privilege. Study 1 showed that participants who preferred their racial in-group reported less desire to change White privilege and greater desire to avoid learning information about White privilege. Inconsistent with expectations, Study 2 showed that participants who anticipated negative affective responses to learning about White privilege reported greater desire to change White privilege.

Does the Name-Race Implicit Association Test Measure Racial Prejudice?

2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don van Ravenzwaaij ◽  
Han L. J. van der Maas ◽  
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Keyword(s):  
Diffusion Model ◽  
Implicit Association Test ◽  
Alternative Explanation ◽  
Group Membership ◽  
Racial Prejudice ◽  
Decision Time ◽  
Association Test ◽  
Implicit Association ◽  
Model Decomposition ◽  
Test Measure

Research using the Implicit Association Test (IAT) has shown that names labeled as Caucasian elicit more positive associations than names labeled as non-Caucasian. One interpretation of this result is that the IAT measures latent racial prejudice. An alternative explanation is that the result is due to differences in in-group/out-group membership. In this study, we conducted three different IATs: one with same-race Dutch names versus racially charged Moroccan names; one with same-race Dutch names versus racially neutral Finnish names; and one with Moroccan names versus Finnish names. Results showed equivalent effects for the Dutch-Moroccan and Dutch-Finnish IATs, but no effect for the Finnish-Moroccan IAT. This suggests that the name-race IAT-effect is not due to racial prejudice. A diffusion model decomposition indicated that the IAT-effects were caused by changes in speed of information accumulation, response conservativeness, and non-decision time.

Racial Prejudice: Doing What Comes Naturally?

1977 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 680-682
Author(s):  
ELISE E. LESSING
Keyword(s):  
Racial Prejudice
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document