Food Caching and Its Possible Origin in the Brown Creeper

The Condor ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 483
Author(s):  
Steven L. Lima ◽  
Robert M. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Bird Behavior ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark T. Stanback
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 139-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Croston ◽  
Carrie L. Branch ◽  
Angela M. Pitera ◽  
Dovid Y. Kozlovsky ◽  
Eli S. Bridge ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sallie J. Hejl ◽  
Karen R. Newlon ◽  
Jock S. Young ◽  
Mary E. McFadzen ◽  
Cameron K. Ghalambor
Keyword(s):  

Ursus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (32e7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandros A. Karamanlidis ◽  
Nikos Panagiotopoulos
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 356 (1413) ◽  
pp. 1483-1491 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. Clayton ◽  
D. P. Griffiths ◽  
N. J. Emery ◽  
A. Dickinson

A number of psychologists have suggested that episodic memory is a uniquely human phenomenon and, until recently, there was little evidence that animals could recall a unique past experience and respond appropriately. Experiments on food–caching memory in scrub jays question this assumption. On the basis of a single caching episode, scrub jays can remember when and where they cached a variety of foods that differ in the rate at which they degrade, in a way that is inexplicable by relative familiarity. They can update their memory of the contents of a cache depending on whether or not they have emptied the cache site, and can also remember where another bird has hidden caches, suggesting that they encode rich representations of the caching event. They make temporal generalizations about when perishable items should degrade and also remember the relative time since caching when the same food is cached in distinct sites at different times. These results show that jays form integrated memories for the location, content and time of caching. This memory capability fulfils Tulving's behavioural criteria for episodic memory and is thus termed ‘episodic–like’. We suggest that several features of episodic memory may not be unique to humans.


2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Geleynse ◽  
Erica Nol ◽  
Dawn M. Burke ◽  
Ken A. Elliott

The Brown Creeper (Certhia americana Bonaparte, 1838) has been identified as one of the most sensitive passerines to partial forest harvest in North America. The effect of selection logging on Brown Creeper density, nest timing, nest survival, and nest and foraging site selection was examined in five silviculture treatments (intensive group selection, typical group selection, old single-tree selection, recent single-tree selection, and control forests) of Algonquin Provincial Park, Canada. As Brown Creeper nests under the bark of large, decaying trees, we hypothesized that Brown Creeper density, timing of breeding, nest survival, and nest and foraging site selection would be negatively affected by silviculture through the removal of large, decaying trees as part of providing safe conditions for loggers. We monitored 101 nests of Brown Creeper during the 2010 and 2011 breeding seasons, mapped territories to estimate density, and conducted foraging surveys. Brown Creeper density was reduced by about 42% in logged stands compared with control stands. Despite that, silviculture did not significantly alter timing of breeding or nest survival. However, the loss of large trees through partial harvesting meant that Brown Creeper nested closer to adjacent, small forested wetlands and often in balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.) in treated stands. In control stands, Brown Creeper nested further from forested wetlands, disproportionately in greater numbers in upland hardwoods, and preferentially in the bark of snags of yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis Britton). The change in the species of tree used for nesting and the general forest type as a result of logging also resulted in consequences for the selection of foraging substrates. To maintain higher densities of Brown Creeper in logged stands in Algonquin Park, we recommend retaining larger diameter yellow birch, both snags and live trees, preferably within strategically located uncut reserves based on habitat supply planning, that maintains patches roughly the size of Brown Creeper territories (10 ha).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document