Further Facts concerning Losses to Wild Animal Life Through Pest Control in California

The Condor ◽  
1932 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 121-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean M. Linsdale
Keyword(s):  
Nature ◽  
1932 ◽  
Vol 130 (3292) ◽  
pp. 841-841
Keyword(s):  

The Condor ◽  
1936 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 199-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Lee Chambers

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Tony Weis

This paper attempts to locate changing interspecies relations in the dynamism and violence of capitalist expansion on a world scale, setting out two primary ways that the rising exploitation of non-human animals contributed to the development of settler-colonial economies, destabilization of indigenous societies, and transformation of ecosystems. One path was set by burgeoning demand essentially turning some wild animal species into increasingly valuable commodities and driving the rising scale and systematization of extraction and trade, which tended to quickly undermine conditions of abundance and make these animal frontiers very mobile. The second way started from the introduction of domesticated animals, with the muscle power and bodily commodities derived from proliferating populations valued not only in the expansion of agricultural landscapes but also in the formation and functioning of other resource frontiers, and ultimately bound up in waves of enclosures and expulsions. This framework seeks to simultaneously pose challenges for historical analysis and provide insights that help to understand the trajectory of animal life today. 


Oryx ◽  
1954 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 366-374
Author(s):  
J. Tokwara

In a foreword to the report Mr. R. Dreschfield, the Chairman, writes: “There has been steady and thorough work in the field of game preservation. The wardens have got to know their areas, have set up ranger posts, have practically stopped poaching, and have carried on considerable research into the game. This is our most important work and the work to which we, as trustees, are by law committed. The long title to the Ordinance which is the fount of our existence reads: ‘An Ordinance to provide for the Establishment of National Parks for the purpose of preserving Wild Animal Life, Wild Vegetation, and providing for other matters incidental thereto.’ Necessary, therefore, as it is to provide transport, accommodation, and observation facilities within the parks, we and the public must remember that these activities are only incidental to our main purpose.


Oryx ◽  
1951 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-107

The inspiration of most recent thought upon National Parks springs from the work done in 1933 at the London Conference for the Protection of African Fauna and Flora. The definition there adopted for the term “National Park” was, shortly, that it should mean an area placed under public control and set aside for the protection of wild animal life and wild vegetation, for the benefit and enjoyment of the general public. From this definition, already shortened, it is important to extract the object for which a National Park is formed and for which it is maintained. This object is the protection of wild life. It is not the enjoyment of the general public, for that is a different thing altogether, a result following the attainment of the object.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document