Interstate Commerce Commission. Regulation of Rates. Fully-Distributed Cost Is Not the Proper Standard for Determining Which of Two Modes Has the Inherent Advantage under the Interstate Commerce Act, Section 15(a) (3). Louisville & N. R. R. v. United States, 268 F. Supp. 71 (W. D. Ky. 1967), Prob. Juris. Noted, 36 U. S. L. W. 3277 (U. S. Jan. 15, 1968) (No. 809)

1968 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 905
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Interstate Commerce Commission ◽  
Interstate Commerce ◽  
Commission Regulation ◽  
Inherent Advantage

Organization of the Executive Branch of the National Government of the United States: Changes between June 1 and July 15, 1938

1938 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 931-935
Author(s):  
L. F. Schmeckebier
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Executive Branch ◽  
National Government ◽  
Executive Order ◽  
Interstate Commerce Commission ◽  
Interstate Commerce ◽  
Department Of Commerce

As in previous lists, mention is here confined generally to units specifically authorized by law or established by the President by executive order under general authority vested in him. Changes in units created by heads of departments or independent establishments are excluded unless of major importance.Air Commerce Bureau, Department of Commerce. Duties transferred to Civil Aëronautics Authority by Civil Aëronautics Act of 1938 (Public Act No. 706, 75th Congress), approved June 23, 1938.Air Mail Bureau, Interstate Commerce Commission. Duties transferred to Civil Aëronautics Authority by Civil Aëronautics Act of 1938 (Public Act No. 706, 75th Congress), approved June 23, 1938.

scholarly journals The Interstate Commerce Commission

1937 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 257
Author(s):  
Stuart Daggett ◽  
I. L. Sharfman
Keyword(s):  
Interstate Commerce Commission ◽  
Interstate Commerce
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document