War. Military Law. Reference to Presidential Policy Directive Held Prejudicial and Future Use of Manual for Courts-Martial Restricted. United States v. Rinehart (U. S. C. M. A. 1957)

1958 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 388
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Military Law ◽  
Presidential Policy

A Treatise on the Military Law of the United States

1898 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 148
Author(s):  
S. H. ◽  
George B. Davis
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Military Law ◽  
The Military

A Treatise on the Military Law of the United States

1898 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 654
Author(s):  
W. M. C. ◽  
G. B. Davis
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Military Law ◽  
The Military

scholarly journals Presidential Policy Guidance: Procedures for Approving Direct Action Against Terrorist Targets Located Outside The United States and Areas of Active Hostilities

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 1209-1225
Author(s):  
Rita Siemion
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Direct Action ◽  
Bush Administration ◽  
The United States ◽  
Barack Obama ◽  
Drone Strikes ◽  
Policy Guidance ◽  
Presidential Policy

With the rise of terrorist threats emanating from outside the territory of the United States and simultaneous advancements in armed drone technology, the United States began a rapidly escalating lethal drone program in the years after 9/11. While the first U.S. drone strike occurred in Yemen in 2002 during the George W. Bush administration, President Barack Obama dramatically increased the number of drone strikes during his first term.

US cybersecurity will target China and Russia

2019 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Economic Espionage ◽  
Presidential Policy

Subject US cybersecurity policies. Significance Since removing Presidential Policy Directive (PPD) 20, an elaborate inter-agency mechanism for gaining approval for cyberattacks, the United States has become more proactive in cyberspace. Russia and China, however, show no signs of dialling down their cyberattacks and their moves are increasingly difficult to anticipate. US cyber strategies and institutions are therefore evolving to meet new threats. Impacts Russia is evolving its approach to electoral interference; the risks to the 2020 presidential polls are, therefore, serious. China’s commitment to achieving technological supremacy will fuel economic espionage. International efforts to develop norms governing offensive cyber campaigns will advance slowly.

scholarly journals CONCEPTUAL REVIEW OF THE UNITED STATES CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE ARCHITECTURE: POLICY, LAW AND ADMINISTRATION

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vephkhvia Grigalashvili ◽  
◽  
Khatuna Abiashvili ◽  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Critical Infrastructure ◽  
The United States ◽  
Critical Infrastructure Protection ◽  
Infrastructure Protection ◽  
Nation States ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Infrastructure System ◽  
Presidential Policy ◽  
National Infrastructure

The United States` Critical Infrastructure System (CIs) represents an umbrella concept grouping all those resources that are essential for national economic, financial, and social system. These critical infrastructures are vital and without them, or with any damages to them, would cripple the nation, states, and/or local communities and tribes. Based on a systematic review approach (methodology), this paper aims to review the United States’ Critical Infrastructure Protection System (USCIPS) at tree aspects. In section one, the policy pillars of USCIPS are outlined based on studding Presidential Policy Directive 21 (PPD-21) and National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP). Section two discusses the interdependent nature of the sixteen critical infrastructure sectors and identified the further designation of life-line sectors. Final sector introduces USCIPS stakeholders, collaboration and partnership across between the private sector and public sector stakeholders.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document