Income Taxes. Deductions: Depreciation, Obsolescence, and Amortization. "Useful Life" and "Salvage Value" Defined as Service Life to the Taxpayer and Estimated Proceeds on Disposition. United States v. Massey Motors, Inc. (5th Cir. 1959)

1960 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 593
Author(s):  
Dilip Mistry ◽  
Jill Hough

A predictive model is developed that uses a machine learning algorithm to predict the service life of transit vehicles and calculates backlog and yearly replacement costs to achieve and maintain transit vehicles in a state of good repair. The model is applied to data from the State of Oklahoma. The vehicle service lives predicted by the machine learning predictive model (MLPM) are compared with the default useful life benchmark (ULB) of the U.S. Federal Transit Administration (FTA). The model shows that the service life predicted by the MLPM provides relatively more realistic predictions of replacement costs of revenue vehicles than the predictions generated using FTA’s default ULB. The MLPM will help Oklahoma’s transit agencies facilitate the state of good repair analysis of their transit vehicles and guide decision makers when investing in rehabilitation and replacement needs. The paper demonstrates that it is advantageous to use a MLPM to predict the service life of revenue vehicles in place of the FTA’s default ULB.


1977 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven D. Gold

This paper describes and analyzes the experiences of Norway. Sweden and Denmark with local income taxation in order to test the validity of comments made by numerous American economists about such taxes. Although local income taxes are their major source of locally raised revenue, it appears that the problems of revenue instability and tax base mobility are not serious in these countries. Fiscal disparities have been greatly reduced through consolidation of government units and heavy reliance on transfers from the national government, and these institutional arrangements may have reduced local autonomy in some important respects. The heavy reliance on income taxes by all levels of government is one reason for the extremely high marginal tax rales to which most workers are subject.


2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall Morck ◽  
Bernard Yeung

In 2003, the United States enacted a tax reform that reduced, but did not eliminate, individual dividend income taxes. Cutting the dividend tax deprives corporate insiders of a justification for retaining earnings to build unprofitable corporate empires. But not eliminating it entirely preserves an advantage for institutional investors, who can put pressure on underperforming managers. This balance is broadly appropriate in the United States—whose large companies are freestanding and widely held. In addition, preserving the existing tax on intercorporate dividends, in place since the Roosevelt era, discourages the pyramidal corporate groups commonplace in other countries, and preserves America's large corporate sector of free-standing widely held firms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document