Constitutional Law: Appellate Jurisdiction over State Court Decisions: When Is a State Court Decision "Final"

1953 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 1070
Author(s):  
Marcus A. Rowden
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
State Court ◽  
Court Decisions

Public Perceptions of State Court Impartiality and Court Legitimacy in an Era of Partisan Politics

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-80
Author(s):  
Corey Barwick ◽  
Ryan Dawkins
Keyword(s):  
Public Perceptions ◽  
State Court ◽  
Partisan Politics ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
State Supreme Courts ◽  
Supreme Courts ◽  
Political World ◽  
Policy Goals ◽  
Citizen Perceptions ◽  
Original Survey

Why do some people evaluate state supreme courts as more legitimate than others? Conventional academic wisdom suggests that people evaluate courts in nonpartisan ways, and that people make a distinction between how they evaluate individual court decisions and how they evaluate the court’s legitimacy more broadly. We challenge this idea by arguing that people’s partisan identities have a strong influence on how people evaluate the impartiality of courts, just as they do other aspects of the political world. Using original survey experiments, validated by existing observational survey data, we show that people perceive state supreme courts as being more impartial when courts issue decisions that match the ideological preferences of their preferred political party, while court decisions at odds with their party’s policy goals diminish people’s belief that courts are impartial arbiters of the law. We also show that the effects of citizen perceptions of impartiality erode evaluations of state court legitimacy, which makes them want to limit the independence of judicial institutions.

Digital platforms under fire: What Australia can learn from recent developments in Europe

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-282
Author(s):  
Samson Esayas ◽  
Dan Svantesson
Keyword(s):  
Court Decision ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Clear Trend ◽  
Digital Platforms ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Selection Of

There is a clear trend of a hardening attitude towards digital platforms. In Australia this trend is exemplified by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s current inquiry specifically into digital platforms. Further, it can also be seen in court decisions. Having discussed one such court decision, we give a brief overview of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s digital platforms inquiry. We then seek to bring attention to a selection of particularly relevant European developments that may usefully inform how Australia proceeds in this arena and that may be considered in the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s final report due to be provided to the Treasurer on 3 June 2019.

scholarly journals The Narrative Model of Constitutional Implications: A Defence of Roach v Electoral Commissioner

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Crowe
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Social Practices ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
High Court ◽  
Fictional Narratives ◽  
Narrative Model ◽  
Way Of Thinking ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

The role of implications in Australian constitutional law has long been debated. Jeffrey Goldsworthy has argued in a series of influential publications that legitimate constitutional implications must be derived in some way from authorial intentions. I call this the intentionalist model of constitutional implications. The intentionalist model has yielded a sceptical response to several recent High Court decisions, including the ruling in Roach v Electoral Commissioner that the Constitution enshrines an implied conditional guarantee of universal franchise. This article outlines an alternative way of thinking about constitutional implications, which I call the narrative model. I argue that at least some constitutional implications are best understood as arising from historically extended narratives about the relationship of the constitutional text to wider social practices and institutions. The article begins by discussing the limitations of the intentionalist model. It then considers the role of descriptive and normative implications in both factual and fictional narratives, before applying this analysis to the Australian Constitution. I argue that the narrative model offers a plausible basis for the High Court’s reasoning in Roach v Electoral Commissioner.

scholarly journals STUDY OF CONTRACT OBJECT IN MULTI-SERVICE FINANCING USING IJARAH IN ISLAMIC BANK

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 225
Author(s):  
Kamalia Firdausi
Keyword(s):  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Islamic Bank ◽  
Approach Method

In a case of a dispute between an islamic bank and a customer related to multi-service financing using an ijarah contract at an islamic bank, the customer is suing for the cancellation of the contract on the multi-service financing on the grounds that the object of the contract is not the object of the contract, so the contract should be null and void. However, the court decision stated that he rejected the customer's claim. This research was conducted to examine the application of sharia principles in legal considerations in court decisions regarding contract objects in multi-service financing using the ijarah contract. This research is a normative legal research using the statutory approach method. The results of this study indicate that the legal considerations in court decisions regarding the object of the contract in multi-service financing using the ijarah contract are formally correct, but materially there is still a possibility of gharar that is not in accordance with sharia principles.

scholarly journals In the Beginning There Was None: Supreme Court Review of State Criminal Prosecutions

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin C. Walsh
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Federal Court ◽  
Structural Relationship ◽  
State Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Court System ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Federal Judiciary ◽  
Federal Jurisdiction ◽  
In The Beginning

This Article challenges the unquestioned assumption of all contemporary scholars of federal jurisdiction that section 25 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 authorized Supreme Court appellate review of state criminal prosecutions. Section 25 has long been thought to be one of the most important provisions of the most important jurisdictional statute enacted by Congress. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave concrete institutional shape to a federal judiciary only incompletely defined by Article III. And section 25 supplied a key piece of the structural relationship between the previously existing state court systems and the new federal court system that Congress constructed with the Act. It provided for Supreme Court appellate review of certain state court decisions denying the federal-law-based rights of certain litigants.

Behavioral Economics and Court Decision-Making

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Doron Teichman ◽  
Eyal Zamir
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Economic Analysis ◽  
Behavioral Economics ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Social Optimum ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Heuristics And Biases ◽  
Court System ◽  
Economic Analysis Of Law ◽  
The Social

Abstract The economic analysis of law assumes that court decisions are key to incentivizing people and maximizing social welfare. This article reviews the behavioral literature on court decision making, and highlights numerous heuristics and biases that impact judges and jurors and cause them to make decisions that diverge from the social optimum. In light of this review, the article analyzes some of the institutional features of the court system that may help minimize the costs of biased decisions in the courts.

SHORTENED TIMELINE OF APPEAL AGAINST INTERIM COURT DECISIONS MADE AT A PRE-TRIAL STAGE OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

2021 ◽  
pp. 38-49
Author(s):  
Polina O. Gertsen ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preventive Measure ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Medical Organization ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article deals with the problem of classifying interim decisions among those that are appealed in a shortened timeline, and determining the list of such decisions, as well as the closely related problem of determining the rules for calculating such a shortened timeline. Currently, the Criminal Procedure law provides for the possibility of appealing a number of interim decisions made at a pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings before the final decision Moreover, for appealing some interim decisions at a pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings, a general period of appeal is provided - 10 days from the date of the court decision, or the same period from the date of serving with a copy of the decision the person who is in custody, while for others a shortened timeline is 3 days from the date of the decision. Meanwhile, it follows from the literal interpretation of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation that within a shortened three-day period, court decisions on the election of preventive measures in the form of a ban on certain actions, bail, house arrest, detention, the refusal to apply them or extend their application can be appealed. At the same time, such a conclusion is not confirmed either in the positions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation or in judicial practice. Based on the analysis of the criminal procedure law, the position of the Supreme and Constitutional Courts of the Russian Federation, scientific literature and practice, several problems are highlighted. Thus, the author states the discrepancy between the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation when it comes to establishing the terms for appealing the court decision on a preventive measure in the form of bail. In addition, there is no single criterion for establishing shortened deadlines for appealing interim decisions, and there-fore, the list of such decisions requires analysis. In addition, the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation does not contain a norm that determines the rules for calculating daily terms. The author formulates several proposals for amendments. It is proposed to determine the criteria for a shortened appeal timeline as the restriction of the constitutional right to liberty and immunity of a person that requires the immediate judicial review of the lawfulness of such a decision. It is also necessary to correct the phrasing of Article 106 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, which defines the procedure for applying a preventive measure in the form of bail, and establish the rule that appeal against such an interim court decision is filed according to the rules of Chapter 45.1 of the Criminal Procedure Code within ten days. The list of court decisions which must be appealed in a shortened timeline must be expanded by a court decision on putting a suspect or an accused into a medical organization providing medical or psychiatric care in hospital settings for forensic examination, as well as the extension of a person’s stay in a medical organization. In addition, the author has analyzed the approaches to the calculation of daily terms and proposes to amend Part 1 of Article 128 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation by establishing a single procedure for calculating daily terms, which does not take into account the day that served as a starting point of the term.

Major court and tribunal decisions in Australia in 2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Landau ◽  
Dominique Allen
Keyword(s):  
Small Group ◽  
Employment Status ◽  
Federal Court ◽  
Food Delivery ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Judicial Decisions ◽  
Gig Economy ◽  
Employment Standards ◽  
Definition Of

The year 2018 saw significant tribunal and court decisions concerning the definition of ‘casual’ for the purposes of the National Employment Standards, the obligations of labour hire employers, and the employment status of food delivery drivers in the gig economy. This review also covers a number of significant changes to awards made by the Fair Work Commission as part of its 4-yearly award review; a Full Federal Court decision about the extent to which a small group of employees genuinely agreed to approve an enterprise agreement. An unusual tribunal decision about an employee who was assumed to have a disability is noted. Finally, the review considers several significant judicial decisions on accessorial liability and penalites under the Fair Work Act.

Anti-Nepotism Rules: The Legal Rights of Married Co-Workers

1989 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Reed ◽  
Linda J. Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Public Organizations ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Rights ◽  
State Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Public Employer ◽  
The U.S

Anti-nepotism rules in public organizations have led to law suits based on anti-discrimination statutes and the U.S. Constitution. Plaintiffs claim they are entitled to work with their spouses if they are qualified employees. Employers, on the other hand, defend anti-nepotism rules as a business necessity, arguing that married co-workers are a potentially disruptive influence in the office. A review of federal and state court decisions suggests that married co-workers rarely prevail in such cases. In this area of civil and constitutional litigation, public employer liabilities appear to be limited to situations where restrictions are unreasonably broad.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document