An Economic Analysis of the Impact of the Price Support Program upon the Development of the Potato Industry in the United States

1953 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1010
Author(s):  
Roger W. Gray
1955 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
Charles E. Bishop ◽  
Roger W. Gray ◽  
Vernon L. Sorenson ◽  
Willard W. Cochrane

HortScience ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edmund M. Tavernier ◽  
Robin G. Brumfield

The greenhouse, nursery, and sod (GNS) sector in the United States accounted for $10 billion in gross sales or 5% of gross farm receipts, in 1998. Despite its significant economic contributions, the sector receives little attention from policymakers. Part of the problem lies in the absence of empirical economic analysis that addresses the impact of the sector on the U.S. economy. The absence of such analysis places the sector at a disadvantage when agricultural policies are designed to address agricultural imbalances, such as farm income problems, and hinders the ability of the sector to lobby for policies favorable to GNS producers. This study provides estimates of the economic impacts of the GNS sector on the U.S. economy and quantifies the linkages between the GNS sector and other economic sectors. The results show that the sector contributed over $26 billion and $17 billion in output and value added economic activity, respectively, and over 438,000 jobs.


1985 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen D. Whipple ◽  
Charles Powe ◽  
Morgan Gray

AbstractAn interregional reactive programming model of the United States dairy industry is used to test the welfare implications of several dairy program changes on milk producers, milk consumers, and taxpayers. The results showed that each of the tested alternatives (price support reduction, price support reduction with frozen minimum Class I price, assessments, and production quotas) could reduce price support expenditures substantially. However, assessments reduced expenditures most effectively in terms of cost to milk producers for the United States generally while price support reduction with frozen minimum Class I price was most efficacious in terms of cost to Southeast producers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document