The Transfer of Development Rights: A New Technique of Land Use Regulation

1976 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 620
Author(s):  
Jerome G. Rose
Epidemiology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Wang ◽  
Bert Brunekreef ◽  
Ulrike Gehring ◽  
Adam Szpiro ◽  
Gerard Hoek ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 1122-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evangeline R Linkous

Transfer of development rights (TDR) is seen as an important tool for land use planning, in large part because it leverages market mechanisms. TDR extends market concepts used primarily in emissions trading programs to the arena of land use. However, with the exception of a handful of success stories, TDR programs generate few transfers. Although researchers generally attribute the weak performance of TDR to program design flaws, this study demonstrates that the unique conditions presented by urban land markets explain, in part, why TDR programs often underperform. I present a case study of a TDR program in Sarasota, Florida, to address two questions. First, what attributes of urban land markets may impact TDR program design and outcomes? Second, is TDR a planning tool that can achieve desired planning goals, given the conditions of land markets? I find that the unique features of land markets—specifically (1) the sensitivity of development to timing; (2) imperfect information, uncertainty, and speculative activity; (3) unique features of land; (4) the limited number of buyers and sellers; and (5) the development orientation of urban political and planning institutions—distort the market for transferable development rights. The Sarasota case demonstrates how local land market characteristics contributed to a set of incremental program design and implementation decisions that, in sum, amounted to significant departures from fundamental program principles and mechanisms. These resulted in imperfect market conditions and rendered the TDR program ineffective.


1977 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 394-396
Author(s):  
Richard L. Barrows ◽  
Marvin B. Johnson ◽  
Bruce A. Prenguber

1973 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donn A. Derr ◽  
Thomas Norman ◽  
Lee D. Schneider

In the Northeast, major problems relating to natural resource use, particularly agriculture, can be attributable in large part to outgrowths of the rural-urban interface. As communities (cities, towns, boroughs, townships, and counties) strive to fulfill their basic needs for health, education, police protection, recreation, housing, highways, and productive open space, new and more sophisticated methods of implementing land-use controls are needed. Experience indicates that in rapidly urbanizing areas traditional land-use mechanisms for directing growth do not guarantee the degree of permanence that is required to preserve productive open space. An alternative land-use control mechanism to ensure open space preservation explored in this paper is the transfer of development rights and the purchase of development easements.


1979 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Diamond ◽  
Bruce E. Lindsay

Present land use control mechanisms are seen as inadequate for the preservation of open space, agricultural land, and other “uneconomic” uses of land. Many proposals have been cited as possible solutions to the problems created by present land use control mechanisms. The transfer of development rights (hereafter known as TDR's) is one such proposal. This mechanism for land use control can be of several forms. There are severe theoretical and practical problems, to be discussed, which a transfer of development rights program must overcome if it is to function in practical application.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document