Bi-State Bargaining Unit Denied Union Shop Election in State with Anti-Union Shop Act: Labor Law. Labor-Management Relations Act, 1947. Section 14(b) Removes All Federal Restrictions upon State Legislation Prohibiting Compulsory Unionism

doi:10.2307/1226166

Bi-State Bargaining Unit Denied Union Shop Election in State with Anti-Union Shop Act: Labor Law. Labor-Management Relations Act, 1947. Section 14(b) Removes All Federal Restrictions upon State Legislation Prohibiting Compulsory Unionism

Stanford Law Review ◽

10.2307/1226166 ◽

1948 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 151

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Bargaining Unit ◽

Labor Management ◽

State Legislation ◽

Union Shop

Download Full-text

Labor Law. Union Security. Union Shop and Recognition Clauses Bar Contracting out of Work Done by Bargaining Unit Employees. International Union, UAW v. Webster Elec. Co. (7th Cir. 1962)

Harvard Law Review ◽

10.2307/1338895 ◽

1963 ◽

Vol 76 (8) ◽

pp. 1682

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Bargaining Unit ◽

International Union ◽

Union Security ◽

Contracting Out ◽

Union Shop ◽

Work Done

Download Full-text

Labor Law: Labor-Management Relations Act: Effect of Affirmative Deauthorization Vote upon Existing Union-Shop Contract

Michigan Law Review ◽

10.2307/1285185 ◽

1953 ◽

Vol 51 (7) ◽

pp. 1089

Author(s):

Richard D. Rohr

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Labor Management ◽

Union Shop

Download Full-text

Labor Law. Labor Management Relations Act, 1947. Taft-Hartley Amendments Held to Supersede State Statute Requiring Two-Thirds Vote of Employees for Union Shop

Harvard Law Review ◽

10.2307/1336416 ◽

1948 ◽

Vol 62 (1) ◽

pp. 141

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Labor Management ◽

Union Shop

Download Full-text

Labor Law: Impact of Labor-Management Relations Act on State Regulation of Union Shop Contracts

Michigan Law Review ◽

10.2307/1284825 ◽

1949 ◽

Vol 47 (4) ◽

pp. 586

Author(s):

W. J. Schrenk

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

State Regulation ◽

Labor Management ◽

Union Shop

Download Full-text

Labor Law. Labor Management Relations Act. Federal Court Has No General Equity Jurisdiction over Administration of Union Welfare Funds. Moses v. Ammond (S. D. N. Y. 1958)

Harvard Law Review ◽

10.2307/1338310 ◽

1959 ◽

Vol 72 (4) ◽

pp. 778

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Federal Court ◽

Labor Management

Download Full-text

Limitations Placed upon NLRB's Use of Dues Reimbursement Orders: Labor Law. Labor Management Relations. Brown-Olds Remedy

Stanford Law Review ◽

10.2307/1226889 ◽

1961 ◽

Vol 13 (2) ◽

pp. 401

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Labor Management

Download Full-text

Labor Law: Labor-Management Relations Act: Constitutionality of the Emergency Strike Provisions

Michigan Law Review ◽

10.2307/1286022 ◽

1960 ◽

Vol 58 (4) ◽

pp. 595

Author(s):

James N. Adler

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Labor Management

Download Full-text

A Study on the Revised Labor Law Analysis and Labor Management Plan for Korean SMEs to Enter the Cambodian Market

10.16980/jitc.17.2.202104.279 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 17 (2) ◽

pp. 279-300

Author(s):

Joon-Sang Cho

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Management Plan ◽

Labor Management

Download Full-text

Employment Adjustments from the Perspective of Labor Law and Labor-Management Relations

Japanese Economic Studies ◽

10.2753/jes1097-203x080328 ◽

1980 ◽

Vol 8 (3) ◽

pp. 28-66

Author(s):

Yoshito Yamamoto

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Labor Management

Download Full-text

Labor Law. Labor Management Relations Act. Section 301 (a) Gives Federal Courts Jurisdiction over Suit by Union for Enforcement of Award Made in Arbitration Pursuant to Collective-Bargaining Agreement. Textile Workers v. Cone Mills Corp. (4th Cir. 1959)

Harvard Law Review ◽

10.2307/1337992 ◽

1960 ◽

Vol 73 (7) ◽

pp. 1408

Keyword(s):

Collective Bargaining ◽

Labor Law ◽

Federal Courts ◽

Collective Bargaining Agreement ◽

Textile Workers ◽

Labor Management ◽

Made In ◽

Section 301

Download Full-text