scholarly journals Some Problems in the Formulation of a Disability Insurance Program

1939 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 645
Author(s):  
I. S. Falk ◽  
L. S. Reed ◽  
B. S. Sanders
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 873-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Johansson ◽  
Lisa Laun ◽  
Tobias Laun

Abstract We propose a strategy for assessing how the inflow to the disability insurance program has been governed over time. Using ex-post mortality, we analyze the ex-ante health of individuals entering the program, compared to individuals not entering the program in the same year. Applying this strategy to Sweden, we find large variation in the relative health of new beneficiaries compared to non-beneficiaries over time. Some of the fluctuations correspond well to formal changes to screening stringency. However, we also find large variation in health during periods when no changes to formal eligibility criteria have been pursued.


2015 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 137-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Ravndal Kostøl ◽  
Magne Mogstad

Two key questions in thinking about the size and growth of the disability insurance program are to what extent it discourages work, and how valuable the insurance is to individuals and families. These questions motivate our paper. We begin by describing the earnings, disposable income, and consumption of awarded and rejected DI applicants, before and after the disability onset and the allowance decision. Next, we discuss how these descriptive results can be interpreted through the lens of alternative empirical approaches. Our analysis uses a Norwegian population panel data set with detailed information about every individual and household.


Author(s):  
Janet L. Lowder ◽  
Mary B. McKee ◽  
Lisa M. Montoni

2011 ◽  
Vol 101 (7) ◽  
pp. 3308-3329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Till von Wachter ◽  
Jae Song ◽  
Joyce Manchester

Longitudinal administrative data show that rejected male applicants to the Disability Insurance (DI) program who are younger or have low-mortality impairments such as back pain and mental health problems exhibit substantial labor force attachment. While we confirm that employment rates of older rejected applicants are low, continued high numbers of younger and low-mortality beneficiaries have raised the potential employment of DI beneficiaries. Three findings support economic inducement to apply. Mean preapplication earnings have fallen, rejected applicants experience preapplication declines in earnings, and beneficiaries whose first applications were rejected at the DDS level but who ultimately received benefits exhibit substantial employment. JEL: H55, J14, J28, J31


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document