State intervention and commodity production in Ugogo: a historical perspective
IntroductionDuring the 1970s the Tanzanian state moved a very substantial part of the rural population into nucleated settlements. This was followed by the setting up of new village institutions. It was villagization in a double sense: the creation of physical ‘villages’ from dispersed households and the establishment of corporate ‘villages’ (more precisely, village councils) intended to regulate the activities of those households. It was an intervention officially justified as a means of increasing collective consumption (through the provision of health care, schools and other services) and simultaneously of transforming an essentially traditional hoebased agricultural system (by facilitating the use of modern inputs). External commentators have seen it either as a large scale example of misguided bureaucratic practice (Coulson, 1977) or as part of a process of state expansion intended to increase control over peasant production (Bernstein, 1981; Hyden, 1980). My objective here is not to provide another theoretical commentary, but to show that ultimately any overall assessment of the impact of villagization must rest upon detailed analyses of particular local economies. I have restricted my discussion of this impact to household production.