Conflict of Laws. Jurisdiction of Federal Courts. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

1944 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 925
Keyword(s):  
Deposit Insurance ◽  
Federal Courts ◽  
Conflict Of Laws ◽  
Federal Deposit Insurance ◽  
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

scholarly journals Who Determines Customer Property

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariel Mok
Keyword(s):  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Deposit Insurance ◽  
Investor Protection ◽  
Wall Street ◽  
Consumer Protection Act ◽  
The Government ◽  
Federal Deposit Insurance ◽  
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act gives the government the Orderly Liquidation Authority (“OLA”) to seek the liquidation of failing financial companies with the appointment of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“the FDIC”) as receiver. When applied to securities broker-dealers, the OLA calls into question the incorporation of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (“SIPA”) that provides for the orderly liquidation of an insolvent broker-dealer under the oversight of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“the SIPC”). The result is a conflict of control between the FDIC and the SIPC in the event of an OLA broker-dealer liquidation and investor uncertainty regarding the incorporation of SIPA protections for customer property. Problematically, the OLA and its implementing rules leave the FDIC with discretion to modify SIPA protections for customer property.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document