Constitutional Law. Naturalization of Porto Ricans. Suffrage. The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frank Juarbe v. The Board of Inspectors, etc. 32 Miscellaneous, 584

1901 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
The State ◽  
The People

The People of the State of New York against Roland Burnham Molineux

1929 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 158
Author(s):  
E. M. Morgan ◽  
Samuel Klaus ◽  
Underhill Moore ◽  
James N. Rosenberg
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
The State ◽  
The People

scholarly journals Science of constitutional law as a basis for the development of the state legal system

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-224
Author(s):  
G. A. Vasilevich
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Political Pluralism ◽  
Checks And Balances ◽  
The People ◽  
Political Views ◽  
Legal Space ◽  
The Stability

The article analyzes the influence of the science of constitutional law on the formation of constitutional legal relations in the state. The role of scientists in identifying trends in the development of the state and law is reflected. The role of the Constitution as a fundamental act, as an act integrating the entire national legal system, is emphasized. Suggestions are made to improve the system of checks and balances. It is emphasized that the development of constitutional law is influenced by the European legal space. European integration is the most important factor in the process of further development and improvement of national legal systems. A special threat to the stability of the state is created by the split of society, the lack of unity of the people in solving basic issues (property, political pluralism, the real provision of rights and freedoms regardless of political views). The coincidence of constitutional reality and constitutional norms is the most important condition and manifestation of the unity of the state and citizens.

Of Ski Trails and State Constitutions

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Zackin
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
State Constitutions ◽  
Policy Choices ◽  
The People ◽  
Constitutional Tradition

This chapter examines why state constitutions have been so widely criticized and consistently excluded from descriptions of America's constitutional tradition. It seems that the people who wrote the state constitutions failed to grasp the purpose and the nature of constitutional law. Their recognizable features are surrounded, even engulfed, by hundreds of mundane administrative details. Indeed, many state constitutions contain provisions about policy choices as detailed as the construction of ski trails. In order to recognize the principled nature of state constitutionalism, the chapter analyzes the ubiquitous assumptions about “higher lawmaking” and states' idiosyncrasies that have animated its critics. It explores whether we should really revise our conception of American constitutional rights based solely on the state constitutions' (highly detailed) contents. It argues that the criticisms leveled against state constitutions are misplaced and demonstrates that they are actually constitutional.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document