Appellate Injunctive Relief

1922 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 821
Author(s):  
Thomas W. Shelton
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-388
Author(s):  
Philippe Kuhn

This article addresses monetary remedies in employment team move and misuse of confidential information cases. It argues that, after the Supreme Court's decision in One Step (Support) Ltd v Morris-Garner, negotiating (previously Wrotham Park) damages offer a useful additional compensatory tool in misuse of confidential information cases. They can help overcome some of the difficulties with ordinary contractual damages, equitable remedies for breach of fiduciary duty and confidence and limitations in injunctive relief. While One Step is restrictive overall, there is a real role for negotiating damages in employment cases where misuse of confidential information is the sole or predominant breach of contract. The well-established Faccenda approach is suggested for identifying the requisite confidential information.


2019 ◽  
Vol 136 (12) ◽  
pp. 834-846
Author(s):  

Abstract H1 Copyright – Infringement – Sound recordings – Internet radio services – Use of hyperlinks – Communication to the public – Scope and effect of finding on liability – Relief – Whether injunctive relief in general terms appropriate – Whether injunctive relief and any damages inquiry should be limited to specific instances of liability established at trial – Proportionality – Stay of injunction pending appeal – Costs – Relevance of commercial importance of particular issues


1970 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert R. Rosenthal
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document