Constitutional Law. State Law against Advocating Overthrow of United States Government by Force Held Superseded by Smith Act

1954 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 345
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
United States Government ◽  
State Law ◽  
States Government ◽  
Smith Act

On the Constitutionality and Political Morality of Granting Conscience-Protecting Exemptions Only to Religious Believers

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Vallier ◽  
Michael Weber
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
United States Government ◽  
The Political ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Political Morality ◽  
States Government ◽  
Moral Freedom

Under the constitutional law of the United States, government is not required to grant conscience-protecting exemptions. However, when it chooses to grant some such exemptions, government may not privilege religious conscience over secular conscience or disfavor secular conscience relative to religious conscience. In short, government may not discriminate against secular conscience. Moreover, under the political morality of human rights—in particular, under the human right to religious and moral freedom—government should not disfavor secular conscience relative to religious conscience. In that sense, and to that extent, the constitutional law of the United States and the political morality of human rights are aligned.

scholarly journals Typical “Separation” Actions in United States President Donald Trump’s term Under Constitutional law Perspective

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pham Quang Huy ◽  
Pham Ngoc Lam Giang
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
United States Government ◽  
National Public Radio ◽  
American Government ◽  
Public Radio ◽  
American President ◽  
States Government ◽  
The U.S

The article analyzes some typical “separation “activities of the United States government at the beginning of the presidency of Donald Trump. Hence, the authors comment how the United States governments work nowadays in “separation” theory under constitutional law perspective. Keywords: United States, government, separation.   References: [1] Montesquieu (1996), Tinh thần pháp luật, Nhà xuất bản Giáo dục, Hà Nội.[2] Bộ Ngoại giao Hoa Kỳ, Chương trình thông tin Quốc tế (J W. Peltason biên tập, chú thích), 2004, About America: The Constitution of the United States of America with Explanatory Notes (Nước Mỹ: Hiến pháp Hợp chủng quốc Hoa Kỳ và chú thích), tr 59.[3] The U.S Congress, “Our American Government” 2003 Edition. House Congress Resolution 221 of The U.S Congress 108th, June 20, 2003 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CDOC-108hdoc94/pdf/CDOC-108hdoc94.pdf, truy cập ngày 30/3/2020.[4] “Who Is Judge James L. Robart And Why Did He Block Trump's Immigration Order?”, National Public Radio 04/02/2017, https://www.npr.org/2017/02/04/513446463/who-is-judge-james-l-robart-and-why-did-he-block-trumps-immigration-order, truy cập ngày 30/3/2020. [5] Wang, Amy B. “Trump asked for a 'Muslim ban', Giuliani says — and ordered a commission to do it 'legally”. The Washington Post 30/01/2017, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/01/29/trump-asked-for-a-muslim-ban-giuliani-says-and-ordered-a-commission-to-do-it-legally/ truy cập ngày 30/3/2020.[6] Selena Simmons Duffin, “Trump Is Trying Hard To Thwart Obamacare. How's That Going?”, National Public Radio 30/3/2020, https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/10/14/768731628/trump-is-trying-hard-to-thwart-obamacare-hows-that-going, truy cập ngày 30/3/2020.[7] Edwin C. Kisiel III, The Electoral College: Federalism and the Election of the American President, A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University, 2008 Spring, downloaded from http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=honors truy cập ngày 30/3/2020, pp 16.

Panel discussion of human factors standards for United States government agencies

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicki Ahlstrom ◽  
John Lockett ◽  
Janis Connolly ◽  
Dane Russo ◽  
Barry Tillman
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Human Factors ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
United States Government ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
States Government

Time to Heed the Call

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 32-33
Author(s):  
Roderick A. Ferguson
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United States Government ◽  
Social Struggle ◽  
States Government ◽  
Federal Agents

A commentary that situates the current violent repression of Portland protesters by federal agents in the context of United States government repression of activism in prior moments of social struggle.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document