scholarly journals Therapeutic efficacy of connective tissue autotransplants with periosteum and platelet rich plasma in the management of gingival recession

2013 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 664-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bojan Jovicic ◽  
Zoran Lazic ◽  
Milica Nedic ◽  
Stevo Matijevic ◽  
Aleksandra Gostovic-Spadijer
Keyword(s):  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Keratinized Tissue ◽  
Student’S T

Background/Aim. Gingival recession progression in clinical practaice has influenced the development of various surgical procedures and techniques for solving esthetic imperfections and subjective difficulties coused by gingival recession. The aim of this study was to verify efficacy of surgical procedures and to compare both of surgical procedures through the keratinized tissue width. Methods. The study included 20 teeth with gingival recesion, M?ller class I and II. Ten teeth with gingival recession were treated with connective tissue autotransplants with periosteum in combination with coronary guided surgical flap (CTG group). On the contralateral side 10 teeth with gingival recession were treated with the same surgical procedures but in combination with platelet-rich plasma (CTGPRP group). We measured the keratinized tissue width. For statistical significance we used the Student's t-test. Results. The study reveled a statistical significance in reducing vertical deepress of recession by both used treatments. Root deepness in CTG and CTG-PRP group was 90% and 93.5%, respectively. With both surgical techniques we achieved larger zone of keratinized gingiva but with a wide zone of keratinized tissue in CTG - the PRP group. Conclusion. The concept regeneration technique with PRP and with the stimulating influence of platele activated growth factors results in the regeneration of deep periodontal tissue as an important prerequisite for the successful treatment of gingival recession.

scholarly journals Therapeutic efficacy of guided tissue regeneration and connective tissue autotransplants with periosteum in the management of gingival recession

2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. 758-762
Author(s):  
Bojan Jovicic ◽  
Zoran Lazic ◽  
Milica Nedic
Keyword(s):  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Periodontal Diseases ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Guided Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Surgical Flap

Background/Aim. Gingival recession progression in clinical practice as an ethiological factor of periodontal diseases, and symptoms of the disease have caused the development of various surgical procedures and techniques of the reconstruction of periodontal defects. The aim of this study was to verify efficacy of surgical procedures that include connective tissue autotransplants with periosteum and guided tissue regeneration for the treatment of gingival recession. Methods. The study included 20 teet with gingival recession, M?ller class II and III. Ten teeth with gingival recession were treated with resorptive membrane and coronary guided surgical flap (GTR group). On the contralateral side 10 teeth with gingival recession were treated with connective tissue autotransplants with periosteum in combination with coronary guided surgical flap (TVT group). We measured the degree of epithelial attachment (DEA), width of subgingival curettage (WGC) and vertical deepness of recession (VDR). For statistical significance we used Student's ttest. Results. The study revealed statistical significance in reducing VDR by both used treatments. Root deepness in GTR and TVT group was 63.5%, and 90%, respectively. With both surgical techniques we achieved coronary dislocation of the epithelial attachment, larger zone of gingival curettage, and better oral hygiene. Conclusion. Current surgical techniques are effective in the regeneration of deep periodontal spaces and the treatment of gingival recession. Significantly better results were achieved with the used coronary guided surgical flap than with guided tissue regeneration.

scholarly journals Clinical impact of platelet rich plasma in treatment of gingival recessions

2008 ◽  
Vol 136 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 95-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoran Aleksic ◽  
Sasa Jankovic ◽  
Bozidar Dimitrijevic ◽  
Ana Pucar ◽  
Vojkan Lazic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Root Surface ◽  
Coronally Advanced Flap ◽  
Periodontal Tissues ◽  
Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Tissue Graft ◽  
Keratinized Tissue ◽  
Prp Gel

Introduction Root coverage supported with complete regeneration of lost periodontal tissues represents the ultimate goal of gingival recession treatment. Objective This study was designed to evaluate clinical effectiveness of platelet rich plasma gel (PRP) with connective tissue graft (CTG) in the treatment of gingival recession. METHOD 15 gingival recessions Miller class I or II were treated with CTG and PRP (group PRP). Connective tissue graft was harvested from the premolar region using trap door technique. After elevation of the flap, the regional bone and root surface were smeared with activated PRP gel. CTG was also irrigated with PRP gel before placement over the exposed root surface and local bone. Fixed CTG was covered with a coronally advanced flap. The same number of gingival recessions were treated with CTG in combination with the coronally advanced flap with no PRP gel (group TVT). Clinical recordings included recession depth (RD), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and keratinized tissue width (KT) before and 1 year after mucogingival surgical treatment. Results Mean value of RD was significantly decreased from 4.93?0.86 mm to 0.60?0.37 (p<0.01) with CTG and PRP and from 4.76?0.74 mm to 0.63?0.29 mm (p<0.01) in CTG group. This difference was not statistically significant. Results of the keratinized tissue width showed significant increase from 0.88? 0.30 mm presurgery to 3.78?0.49 mm (p<0.01) six months after treatment in PRP group and from 0.90?0.34 mm to 3.15?0.41 in TVT group (p<0.01). This difference was statistically significant (p>0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between treatment groups in CAL and PD. Conclusion Clinical results validate both procedures as effective and highly predictable surgical techniques in solving gingival recession problem. Histological evaluation may confirm advantage of PRP use related to regeneration of periodontal tissues. .

scholarly journals Utilization of two different surgical techniques in gingival recession treatment: A comparative study

2014 ◽  
Vol 142 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 155-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miljan Bajic ◽  
Sasa Jankovic ◽  
Iva Milinkovic ◽  
Sasa Cakic ◽  
Neda Perunovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Coin Toss ◽  
Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Control Side ◽  
Tissue Graft ◽  
Healing Index ◽  
Tunnel Technique

Introduction. Gingival recession is a displacement of gingival margin apically to cementenamel junction. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the results achieved with two different surgical procedures used in gingival recession treatment. Methods. Ten patients with bilateral buccal recession on maxillary canines or premolars were included in the study. Professional teeth cleaning was performed before surgery. Recession on the experimental side was treated with connective tissue graft in combination with coronally advanced, split thickness flap (tunnel technique). Control side recession was treated with connective tissue graft in combination with trapezoidal coronally advanced, full thickness flap. Coin toss was used for side decision. The following parameters were evaluated before surgery and 6 months post-op: Vertical Recession Dimension, Clinical Attachment Level, Apico-coronal width of the keratinized tissue, Healing index (Laundry), RES index, and Patient evaluation of esthetic results. Student?s t-test was used for statistical analysis. Results. Six months after surgery, mean root coverage was 91.5?14.1% and 90.1?14.6% on the experimental and on the control side, respectively. RES index, Healing index (Laundry) and Patient Subjective evaluation of esthetic results showed significantly better results (p?0.05). Conclusion. Both surgical procedures produce highly successful clinical results based on evaluated parameters, but this tunnel technique provides significantly better esthetic results.

Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft for Gingival Recession Coverage: A Case Report

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Mehta
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Tooth Brushing ◽  
Vulnerable Area ◽  
Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Tissue Graft ◽  
Keratinized Tissue ◽  
Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Dentinal Hypersensitivity

The Gingival recession is considered a multi-factorial. The etiology may be an anatomically vulnerable area, faulty tooth brushing, high frenum attachment. In cases where there is progressive recession, aesthetics concern or increasing dentinal hypersensitivity, we can do recession coverage. Depending upon the presence or absence of adequate keratinized tissue we can choose the technique. In case of adequate width of keratinized tissue, usually we can do displaced flap and in case where there is inadequate width, we can do gingival grafting.

scholarly journals Dynamics of Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 and -8 Secretion in Gingival Crevicular Fluid after Gingival Recession Therapy via MCAT with Either Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft or Collagen Matrix

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 731
Author(s):  
Anna Skurska ◽  
Violetta Dymicka-Piekarska ◽  
Robert Milewski ◽  
Małgorzata Pietruska
Keyword(s):  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Gingival Crevicular Fluid ◽  
Collagen Matrix ◽  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Gingival Thickness ◽  
Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Tissue Graft ◽  
Keratinized Tissue ◽  
Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 ◽  
Crevicular Fluid

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine and estimate the changing levels of matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 8 (MMP-1 and MMP-8) in GCF at consecutive stages of healing after root coverage procedure via modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) combined with either sub-epithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) or collagen matrix (CM) and also to relate those changes to clinical outcomes of both therapeutic approaches. Materials and methods: The study involved 20 patients with a total of 91 recessions. Those on one side of the mandible received MCAT plus CM while the contralateral ones MCAT plus SCTG. The evaluation of MMP-1 and MMP-8 concentrations in Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF) took place at baseline, then at 1, 2, and 4 weeks, and finally at 3 months after surgery. Elisa protocol was applied to determine the levels of MMP-1 and MMP-8 in GCF. Results: Three-month observation revealed statistically significant changes in MMP-1, MMP-8 and Sulcus Fluid Flow Rate (SFFR) values after implementation of both techniques. A correlation was found between a difference in MMP-1 concentrations and gain in Keratinized Tissue (KT) after SCTG and CM. MMP-8 levels and a Gingival Thickness (GT) gain observed after CM was also correlated. Conclusions: A type of augmentative material does appear to determine the dynamics of MMP-1 secretion.

scholarly journals Possibilities of modern procedures in gingival recession therapy

2003 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasa Jankovic ◽  
Bozidar Dimitrijevic
Keyword(s):  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Clinical Attachment Level ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Coronally Advanced Flap ◽  
Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Tissue Graft ◽  
Keratinized Tissue ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Attachment Level

This study was designed to compare the effectiveness and predictability of GTR and connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recession. 15 recessions Miller class II and III were treated with bioabsorbable barrier and coronally advanced flap. The same number of defects was treated with connective tissue graft in combination with coronally advanced flap. Clinical recordings included hygiene standards and recession depth (RD) probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and keratinized tissue width (KT) Mean (RD) was statistically significant decreased from 5,47mm presurgery to 0.73mm with GTR (87,76%) and from 5,93mm to 0.60 with CTG (89.9%). Prevalence of complete root coverage was 40% for the GTR and 46,66% for CTG group. No statistically significant differences between treatment groups were observed in this study Treatment of gingival recessions with CTG and GTR present effective and highly predictable mucogingival plastic surgical procedures.

scholarly journals Surgical Removal of Defects in the Palate with the Use of TiNi Mesh

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 354
Author(s):  
M.N. Shakirov ◽  
R.N. Dzhonibekova ◽  
I.D. Tazin ◽  
X.O. Gafarov ◽  
V.Y. Mitasov
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
The Body ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Body Tissues

Application of a thin- profiled mesh NiTi with filaments thickness of 40 micrometer sand with the cell size of 3x3-5x5 mm for patients allows to improve the quality of the surgical technique in conducting surgical procedures for eliminating different forms and sizes of the palate defects. Due to its biochemical, biophysical compatibility with the body tissues and the peculiar integration properties a connective tissue grows around and through the structure of the implant by forming a durable frame. At the same time this process takes place by type of covering the muco-periosteal cover from the wound periphery to the center of the palate, over the implant material and completes with the full elimination of the existing defect. The developed method should be considered as minimally invasive surgical techniques and is recommended as a method of choice for patients with various background diseases.

scholarly journals Tunnel/Pouch versus Coronally Advanced Flap Combined with a Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Maxillary Gingival Recessions: Four-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 2641
Author(s):  
Souheil Salem ◽  
Leila Salhi ◽  
Laurence Seidel ◽  
Geoffrey Lecloux ◽  
Eric Rompen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Gingival Thickness ◽  
Coronally Advanced Flap ◽  
Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Tissue Graft ◽  
Keratinized Tissue

Background: The long-term stability after soft tissue graft for covering gingival recession remains a pivotal goal for both patient and periodontist. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the four-year outcomes of the coronally advanced flap (CAF) versus the pouch/tunnel (POT) technique, both combined with connective tissue graft (CTG), for gingival recession treatment. Methods: Forty patients were initially randomly assigned to the control group (CAF + CTG; N = 20) and the test group (POT + CTG; N = 20). Clinical outcomes included mean root coverage (MRC) and complete root coverage (CRC), gingival thickness (GT), and keratinized tissue (KT) gain. Esthetic outcomes were also analyzed using the pink esthetic score (PES) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). All outcomes initially assessed at six months were extended to four years post-surgery. Results: No significant differences were observed between the two patient groups in terms of MRC and CRC. At four years, significantly greater GT and KT gain were noted in the POT + CTG group, and tissue texture enhancement was also more prominent in the test group. Conclusions: The POT + CTG technique allows for long-term clinical coverage of gingival recessions comparable to that of the CAF + CTG technique, but it potentially improves gingival thickness, keratinized tissue and esthetic results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document