scholarly journals Evaluation of difficulties in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 271-276
Author(s):  
Katarina Sarcev ◽  
Dimitrije Damjanov ◽  
Dijana Kosijer ◽  
Dragomir Damjanov
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Minimally Invasive Procedure ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Preoperative Prediction ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Group B

Introduction. For decades, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been the gold standard in surgical treatment of patients with cholelithiasis all over the world. The main advantage of this approach is that it is a minimally invasive procedure for patients. Although this method is a routine in our country, there are certain cases where the presumed outcome of minimally invasive procedure is not achieved, and the surgery is converted to open surgery, or a subsequent laparoscopic surgery is performed, in order to deal with the complications. The aim of this study was to establish if it was possible to create a model for preoperative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Material and Methods. Two groups of patients were analyzed. Group A included patients with cholelithiasis who were studied in order to determine parameters associated with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Out of 16 analyzed parameters, 8 showed significant correlation with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Based on these parameters, a prediction model was established, consisting of five groups: I - easy (score 1), II - laparoscopic cholecystectomy with mild difficulties (score 2), III - laparoscopic cholecystectomy with major difficulties (score 3), IV - difficult (score 4), V - conversion to open surgery is expected (score 5). This model was preoperatively applied in patients with cholelithiasis included in group B. Results. The overall predictability of the model was 82%. The greatest prediction accuracy was achieved in groups II and III (98.3% and 100%, respectively). Conversion to open cholecystectomy was predicted in 76% of patients. Conclusion. Based on certain preoperative parameters it is possible to establish a model to predict a difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

scholarly journals Conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy in a single center

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-18
Author(s):  
Suttam Kumar Biswas ◽  
Shilpi Rani Roy ◽  
Subbrata Sarker ◽  
Md Mustafizur Rahman ◽  
Kamrul Islam
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Gallbladder Disease ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Calot’S Triangle ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of gallbladder disease, but conversions to open cholecystectomy are still inevitable in certain cases. Knowledge about the rate and underlying reasons for conversion could help surgeons during preoperative assessment and improve the informed consent of patients. We decide to review the rate and causes of conversion of our LC series. This study included 320 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies from January 2017 to December 2019 at Community Based Medical College Hospital Bangladesh, Mymensingh. All patients had surgery performed by same surgeon. Conversion to open cholecystectomy required in 15 (4.6%) patients. Out of 15 cases, the highest number of patients 10(66.6%) were in age group 50 to 59 years with a mean age of 60.1 years and standard deviation (SD) of 9.8 years. Of them 9 (60%) were male. The most common reasons for conversion of them were severe adhesions at calot's triangle 6 (40%) and acutely inflamed gallbladder 5 (33.3%), bleeding 2 (13%). No surgical procedures are complication free. The most common complication was superficial wound infection 8(2.5%). Delayed complications seen in our series is port site incisional hernia 2 (0.62%). Male gender, age older than 60 years, previous upper abdominal surgery, diabetes, and severity of inflammation were all significantly correlated with an increased conversion rate to laparotomy. LC is the preferred method even in difficult cases. This study emphasizes that although the rate of conversion to open surgery and complication rate are low in experienced hands, the surgeons should keep a low threshold for conversion to open surgery. CBMJ 2020 July: Vol. 09 No. 02 P: 14-18

scholarly journals Rate of Conversion and Postoperative Complications of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in District Level Hospital of Bangladesh

1970 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-77
Author(s):  
SK Biswas ◽  
JC Saha ◽  
ASMT Rahman ◽  
ASMZ Rahman ◽  
MM Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Gallbladder Disease ◽  
Key Words Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Biliary Leakage ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Calot’S Triangle ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of gallbladder disease, but conversion to open cholecystectomy and postoperative complications are still inevitable in certain cases. Knowledge of the rate and underlying reasons for conversion and postoperative complications could help surgeons during preoperative assessment and improve the informed consent of patients. We decide to review the rate and causes of conversion and postoperative complications of our LC series. This study included 760 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies from July 2006 to June 2011 at Faridpur Central Hospital and Faridpur Medical College Hospital. All patients had surgery performed by same surgeon. Conversion to open cholecystectomy required in 19 (2.5%) patients. The most common reasons for conversion were severe adhesions at calot's triangle (6, 0.83%) and acutely inflamed gallbladder (5, 0.66%). The incidence of postoperative complications was 1.58%. The most common complication was wound infection, which was seen in 5 (0.66%) patients followed by biliary leakage in 3 (0.40%) patients. Delayed complications seen in our series is port site incisional hernia (2, 0.26%). LC is the preferred method even in difficult cases. Our study emphasizes that although the rate of conversion to open surgery and complication rate are low in experienced hands, the surgeons should keep a low threshold for conversion to open surgery and it should not be taken as a step in the interest of the patient rather than be looked upon as an insult to the surgeon. Key words: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC); Open cholecystectomy; Conversion; Complications; Calot's triangle DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/fmcj.v6i2.9204 FMCJ 2011; 6(2): 74-77

scholarly journals THE CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-61
Author(s):  
I. Slavu ◽  
V. Braga ◽  
L. Alecu
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Preoperative Diagnosis ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Safe Method ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy

After more than 20 years from the beginning of laparoscopic surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy still holds a conversion rate of 5.1 % in the specialty literature. We have conducted a retrospective study based on the experience of the clinical unit of General Surgery within “Prof. Dr. A. Ionescu” Emergency Clinical Hospital, between 1997 and 2013. A number of 2,309 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed. The average age of the group was 47.3 years. Conversion was performed to a number of 58 patients (2.51%), out of which 74.13% women (no. = 43) and 26% men (no. 15). The average age of the patients to whom the conversion was performed was 57. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was more frequent in patients over 60 (no. 38). The main preoperative diagnosis in converted patients was acute lithiasic cholecystitis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe method with optimal results, being considered the “gold standard” in the treatment of bladder lithiasis. Conversion to open surgery is an expression of the surgeon’s experience and wisdom.

EVALUATION OF CLINICO-RADIOLOGICAL FACTORS PREDICTING DIFFICULT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

2021 ◽  
pp. 63-66
Author(s):  
Wasif Mohammad Ali ◽  
Nazia Nanen ◽  
Atia Zaka Ur Rab ◽  
Syed Amjad Ali Rizvi ◽  
Mehtab Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Gall Bladder ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Previous History ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Preoperative Prediction ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
A Prospective Study

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become procedure of choice for treatment of symptomatic gallstone [1] disease . Even though it is a safe procedure occasionally it can be difcult and requires conversion to open cholecystectomy for various problems faced during surgery. Preoperative prediction of difcult laparoscopic cholecystectomy and likelihood of conversion to open cholecystectomy will avoid such complications and overall cost of treatment. Aim: To evaluate the clinico-radiological factors predicting difcult laparoscopic cholecystectomy Methods: This was a prospective study conducted from October 2018 to November 2020. Total of 101 patients meeting inclusion criteria undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the study. Various clinical, radiological and biochemical parameters and intraoperative difculties during surgery were recorded. The statistical analysis was done using chi-square test and ANOVA test. Results: The parameters such as sex, age, duration of disease, co-morbid disease, previous history of cholecystitis, palpable gall bladder, BMI, TLC, thickness of gall bladder, largest stone size and impacted stone are found statistically signicant in predicting difcult laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conversion to open cholecystectomy preoperatively. Conclusion: Difcult laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be predicted preoperatively even with a good clinical judgement whereas both clinical and radiological parameters provide a better preoperative prediction of difcult cholecystectomy so that the surgeon can prepared in advance for the complications.

scholarly journals Comparison of Early and Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-94
Author(s):  
Muhammad Nasir ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Group B

Background: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is now accepted as being safe for acute cholecystitis. However, it has not become routine, because the exact timing and approach to the surgical management remains ill define. Careful selection of patients, the knowledge of typical procedure-related complications, and their best treatment are the key points for a safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Objective: To compare the early and delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the acute phase in terms of frequency of conversion to open cholecystectomy. Study Design: Randomized clinical trial. Settings: Department of Surgery, Divisional Headquarter Hospital, Faisalabad. Punjab Medical College, Faisalabad Pakistan. Duration: Study was carried out over a period of six months from June 2018 to May 2019. Methodology: A total of 152 cases (76 cases in each group) were included in this study. All patients were randomly allocated to either group i.e., group -A early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and group-B delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Results: Mean age was 39.09 + 8.8 and 37.05+ 8.5 years in group- A and B, respectively. In group-A, male patients were 48 (63.2%) and female patients were 28 (36.8%). Similarly, in group-B, male patients were 41 (53.9%) and female patients were 35 (46.1%). Conversion to open cholecystectomy was required in 6 patients (7.9%) of group-A and 16 patients (21.0%) of group – B. Significant difference between two groups was observed (P= 0.021). Conclusion: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is safe and feasible in terms of less frequency of conversion to open cholecystectomy.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Conversion rate and complcation

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
BR Malla ◽  
HN Joshi ◽  
N Rajbhandari ◽  
YR Shakya ◽  
B Karki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conversion Rate ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Gallbladder Disease ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Calot’S Triangle ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Previous Laparotomy ◽  
History Of

Introduction and Objective: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is the standard surgical treatment for gallbladder disease. However, conversion to open surgery is not the complication. Different centers have reported different conversion rates and post operative complications. The objective of this study is to identify conversion rate and post operative complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomyMaterials and Methods: This retrospective study included all laparoscopic cholecystectomies attempted in Dhulikhel hospital during the year 2015. Files of all patients were reviewed to find out the demography of the patients and the indication of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy, the underlying reasons for conversion and postoperative complications were analyzed.Results: Out of 324 cases attempted laparoscopic cholecystetomies, two cases with the history of previous laparotomy were excluded to rule out the bias in the result. Out of 322 cases 226(70.18%)were female and 96(29.81%) were male . The mean age was 38 years. Over all conversion rate to open cholecystetomy was 1.86% with frozen calot’s triangle as the most common reason for conversion. The over all postoperative complication was 1.24% with no major bile duct injury.Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can safely be done with low conversion rate and complication.

scholarly journals Our experience with retrograde technique in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 3691
Author(s):  
Vamsi K. Malligurki
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Surgical Practice ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Surgical Units ◽  
Surgical Expertise ◽  
Dissection Technique ◽  
Retrograde Technique ◽  
Difficult Cases

Background: Gall bladder pathologies are some of the commonly encountered conditions in one’s surgical practice. Cholecystectomy is among the routinely performed procedures in most surgical units. Laparoscopic surgery is preferred to open cholecystectomy because of its various advantages. In straightforward cases, the antegrade technique is routinely employed. The retrograde technique is generally reserved for the difficult cases. The retrograde technique may be used safely with adequate experience, thus reducing the need for conversion into open surgery.Methods: Total 100 cases of consecutive difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies were included in this study, which were operated using retrograde technique.Results: Out of the 100 patients 79 were females and 21 were males. Mean age of the patients was 44.2 years. Out of the 100 cases, 98 cases could be successfully managed using the retrograde technique. 2 cases were converted to open surgery. Bleeding was encountered in 3 cases, which was successfully managed laparoscopically. Bile duct injury was seen in 1 case which was managed after conversion.Conclusions: With adequate surgical expertise and proper instrumentation, retrograde dissection technique may be safely used in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy, reducing the rate of conversion to open surgery.

scholarly journals Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir Shrestha ◽  
Surendra S Shah ◽  
Sanjay Poudyal ◽  
Jay N Shah ◽  
Vijay Kumar Jaiswal
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Health Sciences ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Open Conversion ◽  
Previous Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Calot’S Triangle ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Introductions: With the advent of newer technology, the era of open surgery for gall bladder diseases has been preferably taken over by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, certain cases still require conversion to open surgery. In this review we aim to analyze the reason for conversion. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Patan Hospital, Patan Acdemy of Health Sciences, Nepal. All patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from February 2009 to July 2012 were included in the study. File numbers of all the patients were obtained from operation room register. The patient files were analyzed for age, sex, duration of symptoms, liver function tests, ultrasound findings and the description in operation note for reason for conversion. Results: The age ranged from 12 to 81 years with mean age of patients 32.76 years and male to female ratio 1:2.9. The mean operating time was 65 minutes and average post operative hospital stay was 1.61 days. Out of 305 patients, 34 (11.14%) required open conversion. Factors responsible for open conversion were dense fibrosis at Calots in 11 (3.6%), adhesions due to previous abdominal surgery in 6 (1.9%), uncontrollable bleeding in 5 (1.6%), bile duct injury in 4 (1.3%) cholecystoenteric fistula in 3 (0.9%), Mirizzi’s syndrome 2(0.6%). Conclusions: Adhesions at the calot’s triangle was the common reason for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Plain Language Summary: This study was conducted to determine the predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study found that dense adhesion around calot’s triangle and adhesions pertaining to previous abdominal surgery were the main reasons for conversion to open surgery. So, before embarking on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, it is essential to take detail history and examination, to rule out the probable cause of conversion beforehand and minimize; morbidity, duration of surgery and cost. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jpahs.v1i1.13013 Journal of Patan Academy of Health Sciences. 2014 Jun;1(1):30-32 

scholarly journals THE STUDY OF CONVERSION OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY TO OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS.

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Dug Tariq Hassan ◽  
Rayees Ahmad Bhat ◽  
Liyaqat Nazir ◽  
Shabir Ahmad Dar ◽  
Mohammad Zakiuddin
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Preoperative Risk ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Preoperative Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Scoring

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard in the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis. Some patients require conversion to open surgery and several preoperative variables have been identified as risk factors that are helpful in predicting the probability of conversion.However,there is a need to devise a risk-scoring system based on the identified risk factors to (a) predict the risk of conversion preoperatively for selected patients, (b) prepare the patient psychologically, (c) arrange operating schedules accordingly, and (d) minimize the procedure-related cost and help overcome financial constraints,which is a significant problem in developing countries. AIM: This study was aimed to evaluate preoperative risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in our setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A case control study of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery from May 2016 to April 2017 at Shere Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar. All those patients who were converted to open surgery (n = 73) were enrolled as cases.Two controls who had successful laparoscopic surgery (n = 146) were matched with each case for operating surgeon and closest date of surgery. RESULTS:The final multivariate model identified two risk factors for conversion:ultrasonography signs of inflammation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 8.5;95% confidence interval [CI]:3.3,21.9) and age > 60 years (aOR = 8.1;95% CI:2.9,22.2) after adjusting for physical signs,alkaline phosphatase and BMI levels. CONCLUSION: Preoperative risk factors evaluated by the present study confirm the likelihood of conversion. Recognition of these factors is important for understanding the characteristics of patients at a higher risk of conversion

scholarly journals Short term outcomes of three dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Razaque Shaikh ◽  
Aaijaz Ahmed Shaikh ◽  
Mujib Rehman Abbasi
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Port Site ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the short-term outcomes of three dimensional (3D) versus two dimensional (2D) laparoscopic procedures used for cholecystectomy. Methods: This study was conducted at minimally invasive surgery center of Liaquat University of Medical Health and Sciences (LUMHS) Jamshoro Pakistan, between 15th May 2017 to 16th December 2017 after taking informed consent. All patients were diagnosed cases of cholelithiasis without any complications. Patients having risk factors for inability to get access to gall bladder via laparoscope and in whom the chances of conversion to open cholecystectomy were greater were not included as part of study. One group of patients underwent cholecystectomy under 3D laparoscopy while other group underwent 2D laparoscopy. Surgeons included in the study were all well-trained. The short-term outcome noted were intraoperative and postoperative complications, conversion to open, operative time, mortality and hospital stay. Visual strain and headache for the surgeon in three D laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results: A total of one hundred forty patients were included in the study. Group-A consists of sixty two females and eleven males whereas Group-B comprised of fifty eight females and fifteen males. Eight percent of patients in Group-A whereas in Group-B two percent had gallbladder rupture. Fifteen percent of patients in Group-A whereas 5.4% from Group-B had bleeding from liver bed. One patient from Group-A had CBD (Common Bile Duct) injury. Post-operatively two (2.73%) patients from Group-A had port site bleeding. Six (8.21%) patients had port site infection in Group-A. Conclusion: Three dimensional was found to have low incidence of intra-operative and post-operative complications compared to 2D laparoscopic cholecystectomy. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3721 How to cite this:Shaikh AR, Shaikh AA, Abbasi M. Short term outcomes of three dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(1):162-166. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3721 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document