scholarly journals Metastases of unknown origin: Principles of diagnosis and treatment

2007 ◽  
Vol 60 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 29-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dragana Petrovic ◽  
Ljubomir Muzikravic ◽  
Darjana Jovanovic

DEFINITION Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) origin refers to patients who present with histologically confirmed metastatic cancer in whom a detailed medical history, complete physical examination, including pelvic and rectal examination, full blood count and biochemistry, urinalysis and stool occult blood testing, histopathological review of biopsy speimens with the use of immunohistochemistry, chest radiography, computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis, and in certain cases mammography, fail to identify the primary site. EPIDEMIOLOGY of CUP The cancer of unknown primary accounts for 3%-5% of all human cancers. DIAGNOSIS of CUP The standard diagnostic procedure for the majority of patients includes histopathologic review of biopsy specimens with the use of immunohistochemistry, full blood count, routine biochemistry, fecal occult blood testing, urine testing, chest radiography, and computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis. The four common histologic diagnoses are: adenocarcinoma (70%), poorly differentiated carcinoma (20%), squamous carcinoma (10%), and poorly differentiated neoplasms (5%). PROGNOSIS of CUP The prognosis for most patients with unknown primary tumors is poor, with survival often less than 6 months from diagnosis. THERAPY of CUP Based on clinical and pathologic features, approximately 40% of patients can be categorized within subsets for which specific treatment has been defined. Empiric therapy is an option for the remaining 60% of patients. CONCLUSION Metastatic tumors of unknown origin have a unique clinical presentation due to a specific biology. Insight into the molecular biology of unknown primary tumors will be essential for the development of more effective treatments.

2016 ◽  
pp. 67-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Snehal G. Patel ◽  
William M. Lydiatt ◽  
John A. Ridge ◽  
Christine M. Glastonbury ◽  
Suresh K. Mukherji ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Steven M. Sorscher ◽  
Theodore Thomas

Expression profiling has shown great promise in matching cancers of unknown primary to likely primary tumors of origin based on patterns of mRNA expression. However, it remains uncertain as to whether even well matched tumors will demonstrate the clinical features, such as rate of progression, of their matched counterparts. In this case report, we note that based on histology, immunohistochemistry and expression profile this patient’s poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumor would have been expected to grow very rapidly on no therapy. Instead, this cancer was very indolent, with only very little radiographic progression over several years. We believe this report represents a remarkable case of a tumor where features, including expression profile, would not at all have accurately predicted the clinical course seen. While some series have suggested that matching by expression profiling predicts outcome, this case shows a dramatically different result.


PET-CT ◽  
2005 ◽  
pp. 155-158
Author(s):  
Shahram Bouyadlou ◽  
Peter S. Conti

2011 ◽  
Vol 1816 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Natoli ◽  
V. Ramazzotti ◽  
O. Nappi ◽  
P. Giacomini ◽  
S. Palmeri ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document