scholarly journals Natriuretic peptides and multimarker approach to risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes

2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 248-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radomir Matunovic ◽  
Aleksandar Stojanovic ◽  
Zdravko Mijailovic ◽  
Zoran Cosic

Natriuretic peptides in acute coronary syndromes Brain natriuretic peptides (BNP) and N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptides (N-proBNP) have been shown to provide important prognostic information in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Ischemia may be an important stimulus for BNP release. This does not imply, however, that BNP is useful for diagnosing ischemia, and BNP is unlikely to prove sensitive or specific enough for this purpose. Significance of natriuretic peptides in assessing prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes In patients with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, higher BNP and N-proBNP levels have been shown to predict a grater likelihood of death or heart faiulure, independent of other prognostic factors. Therapeutic implications of BNP elevation in acute coronary syndromes Patients with BNP or NT-proBNP elevation following ACS are clearly at high risk for death and for developement of heart failure, but specific therapeutic implications of BNP elevation have not been defined. In particular, it is not known how patients with BNP elevation should be treated considering the fact that they have normal troponin levels and no clinical evidence of heart failure. Multimarker strategies for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes It has been shown recently that in patients with acute coronary syndromes the risk increased sequentially among those with one, two or three elevated biomarkers. Therapeutic applications of cardiac biomarkers in acute coronary syndromes Multimarker strategies, that incorporate panels of cardiac bio?markers, are likely to be used in the future for risk stratification and for pathophysiologically-guided treatement of patients with ACS.

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. A773
Author(s):  
Giulia Magnani ◽  
Michelle O’Donoghue ◽  
Eugene Braunwald ◽  
Dylan Steen ◽  
Petr Jarolim ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Eric Durand ◽  
Aurès Chaib ◽  
Etienne Puymirat ◽  
Nicolas Danchin

Patients presenting at the emergency department with acute chest pain and suspected to represent an acute coronary syndrome were classically admitted as routine to the cardiology department, resulting in expensive and time-consuming evaluations. However, 2-5% of patients with acute coronary syndromes were discharged home inappropriately, resulting in increased mortality. To address the inability to exclude the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, chest pain units were developed, particularly in the United States. These provide an environment where serial electrocardiograms, cardiac biomarkers, and provocative testing can be performed to confirm or rule out an acute coronary syndrome. Eligible candidates include the majority of patients with non-diagnostic electrocardiograms. The results have been impressive; chest pain units have markedly reduced adverse events, while simultaneously increasing the rate of safe discharge by 36%. Despite evidence to suggest that care in chest pain units is more effective for such patients, the percentage of emergency or cardiology departments setting up chest pain units remains low in Europe.


Circulation ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 105 (15) ◽  
pp. 1760-1763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc S. Sabatine ◽  
David A. Morrow ◽  
James A. de Lemos ◽  
C. Michael Gibson ◽  
Sabina A. Murphy ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 61 (10) ◽  
pp. E194
Author(s):  
Jose Briseño ◽  
Hector Gonzalez Pacheco ◽  
Alexandra Arias Mendoza ◽  
Julio Sandoval-Zarate

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document