scholarly journals A study of the initial stages of the electrochemical deposition of thallium on copper, Part IV. The potential step results: Underpotential deposition on (111), (110) and (100) oriented copper single c

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jovan Jovicevic ◽  
Alan Bewick

The underpotential deposition and dissolution of thallium onto carefully chemically polished single crystal copper (111), (110) and (100) electrode surfaces from acetate, sulphate and perchlorate solutions have been investigated using single and double potential step techniques. It appeared that the different anions used did not change the current-time response characteristics significantly. Current-time responses to the potential steps applied strongly resemble those observed in the case of thallium underpotential deposition on silver single crystals [1]. The characteristics of i-t transients obtained by single potential step suggest very fast 2D crystal growth processes taking place. Sharp linear voltammetry peaks, which are observed for both thallium and lead deposition on Cu(111) [3,8] and on Ag(111) [1,3], probably always indicate nucleative phase formation processes but the rate of the lattice growth step will vary from system to system. Comparison of the obtained results with those for lead underpotential deposition [8-13] on Cu(111), (110) and (100) suggests that, in the present case, the rate of the 2D lattice building process for both thallium underpotential monolayers formed on three copper single crystal surfaces examined is so fast that it becomes controlled by diffusive processes; this will probably be surface diffusion [24,25] initially and, at longer times planar bulk diffusion. Double pulse experiments did not help significantly in attempts to obtain i-t transients capable of providing data suitable for showing conclusively the occurrence of 2D crystal formation processes. A similar situation occurred also with silver substrates [1].

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-182
Author(s):  
Jovan Jovicevic ◽  
Alan Bewick

The over potential deposition of thallium onto carefully chemically polished single crystal copper (111), (110) and (100) electrode from sulfate and perchlorate solutions have been investigated using single and double potential step techniques. It appears that the different anions used did not change the current-time response characteristics significantly. The charge corresponding to UPD monolayers of thallium (?210?10-6 Ascm-2 for the first, and ?400?10-6 Ascm-2 for both, first and second, monolayers on all three orientations of the copper substrates used) were observed under the initial falloff seen on the current-time transients obtained at very short times, preceding the currenttime relationships for the overpotential deposition. Indication of a rising i-t transient reflecting bulk thallium deposition on Cu(111) and Cu(100) were usually observed at ?=-9mVvs.Tl while an over potential of ?=-10mVvs. Tl was needed for similar effects on Cu(110). The observed i vs. t2 linearity is characteristic to 3D instantaneous nucleation and further growth of 3D centres. The results show no appreciable 3D nucleation occurring until the UPD monolayers were completed. It must be concluded, therefore, that thallium over potential deposition on copper single crystal surfaces starts with a charge transfer controlled 3D instantaneous nucleation and proceeds by 3D growth. After some time the individual 3D centres overlap and the rate of increase of current falls off until finally the limiting current is reached. Similarly to the cases of lead deposition on Ag18 and Cu30 crystals, bulk deposition of thallium commences only after the two UPD close-packed thallium monolayers have been completed on the underlying substrate. Formation of the two UPD thallium close-packed monolayers, in the case of copper (111), (110) and (100) substrates, is an essential precursor to thicker thallium deposits their influence on the initiation of the over potential deposition and its growth mechanism, was shown to be very significant.


2001 ◽  
Vol 101 (7) ◽  
pp. 1897-1930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Herrero ◽  
Lisa J. Buller ◽  
Héctor D. Abruña

2004 ◽  
Vol 570 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiyoshi Kuzume ◽  
Enrique Herrero ◽  
Juan M Feliu ◽  
Richard J Nichols ◽  
David J Schiffrin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document