The institution of group and genocidal acts
This critique is focused on a small theory regarding the constituting of a group through the simultaneous exclusion of some other group. Is it possible, then, to produce social and non-social acts (negative social acts) at the same time? Or is it possible to construct a group which acts ?genocidally?, meaning that it destroys another group or ?the groupness? of a group, and at the same time affirm its own unity and its ontological stability? (I have used the word ?institution? in the title, since we are dealing with a group that is lasting, and not temporary.) Finally, does this thematization of the group through inter-group antagonism have anything to do with Lemkin?s word ?genocide??