scholarly journals Distal radius fractures: Systematic review

2013 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzana Milutinovic ◽  
Sladjana Andjelkovic ◽  
Tomislav Palibrk ◽  
Slavisa Zagorac ◽  
Marko Bumbasirevic

Distal radius fractures are an increasingly prevalent upper extremity injury, especially among elderly patients. They represent approximately 3% of all upper extremity injures. Severity of these fractures is directly related to bone mineral density of the patient, and clinical results are dependent on this parameter as well. There is a bimodal distribution of these injuries, with a peak between 18 to 25 years of age, predominantly male population and a second peak in the elderly, older than 65 years, predominantly female population. Early reports of fractures of the distal radius considered these fractures to be group of injuries with a relatively good prognosis irrespective of the treatment given. When it comes to complex fractures, regardless of the method applied, major or minor functional invalidity persists. With that in mind fractures of the distal radius are medical, social and economic problems of modern society.

2020 ◽  
pp. 175319342094131
Author(s):  
Brent R. DeGeorge ◽  
Holly K. Van Houten ◽  
Raphael Mwangi ◽  
Lindsey R Sangaralingham ◽  
Sanjeev Kakar

To compare the outcomes of non-operative versus operative treatment for distal radius fractures in patients aged from 18 to 64 years, we performed a retrospective analysis using the OptumLabs® Data Warehouse using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes of distal radius fracture. Of the 34,184 distal radius fractures analysed, 11,731 (34%) underwent operative management. Short-term complications within 90 days of fracture identified an overall complication rate of 16.6 per 1000 fractures and the 1-year upper extremity-specific complication rate was 287 per 1000 fractures. Overall, post-injury stiffness was the most common 1-year upper extremity-specific complication and was associated with operative management (202.8 vs. 123.4 per 1000 fractures, operative vs. non-operative, p < 0.01). Secondary procedures were significantly more common following non-operative management (8.7% vs. 43%, operative vs. non-operative, p < 0.01) with carpal tunnel release representing the most common secondary procedure. Operative management of distal radius fractures resulted in significantly fewer secondary procedures at the expense of increased overall 1-year complication rates, specifically stiffness. Level of evidence: III


Hand Surgery ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (02n03) ◽  
pp. 213-224
Author(s):  
Noriyuki Yoshida ◽  
Kazuhiko Matsushita ◽  
Takeshi Arai ◽  
Ko Izumiyama ◽  
Moroe Beppu ◽  
...  

The purpose of this study was to develop plates that fit the contour of the distal radius of the Japanese and can be inserted less invasively. Three-dimensional models of 36 radii of 18 volunteers were prepared. Using these models, the shape of the cortical bone on the radial margin of the distal radius and just below the dorsal fourth compartment of the wrist, to which the plates were expected to be applied, was measured, and the curves of the plates were determined. The functions of approximated curves of the plates were: [ y = -2 × 10-8 x 5 - 2 × 10-6 x 4 + 0.0006 x 3 - 0.0312 x 2 + 0.3274 x + 15.224 on the radial margin of the distal radius and [ y = 7 × 10-7 x 5 - 0.0001 x 4 + 0.0078 x 3 - 0.2355 x 2 + 3.1815 x - 5.6383 just below the fourth compartment. The clinical results of the application of double dorsal plates were satisfactory in clinical cases for the distal radius fractures.


Hand Surgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 173-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel P. Estrella ◽  
Paulo L. Panti

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical results of unstable distal radius fractures treated with ORIF with plate and screws compared to EF. Patients with unstable distal radius fractures treated with ORIF or EF from January 2005 to December 2010 were reviewed in terms of the Modified Mayo Wrist Score, range of motion, pain, grip strength, and radiologic parameters. Results showed that there was no difference in the Modified Mayo Wrist Score between ORIF (17 patients) and EF (11 patients) (p = 0.07). The ORIF group had better wrist flexion, wrist extension, pronation and supination compared to the EF group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in terms of radial and ulnar deviation, grip strength, pain and postoperative radiologic parameters (p < 0.05). Better wrist flexion, wrist extension and forearm rotation can be expected in ORIF compared to EF in the management of unstable distal radius fractures.


1999 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 966-969
Author(s):  
Ryuya Ochi ◽  
Tetsuo Nakano ◽  
Yasuyuki Abe ◽  
Yasuhiro Shimizu ◽  
Ichiro Seike ◽  
...  

Hand ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 561-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Abe ◽  
Susumu Tokunaga ◽  
Takuro Moriya

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes and complications of volar and dorsal plating for the management of intra-articular distal radius fractures, with special regard to indications for dorsal plating. Furthermore, we examine the rationale for choosing dorsal plating and its frequency of use. Methods: Clinical assessments included range of motion measurements at the wrist; grip strength; the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score; and the Gartland and Werley score. Clinical results were compared with those achieved using a volarly placed locking plate system. According to Lutsky’s plate theory, the rationale for choosing dorsal plating was based on 4 types of pathologic fractures. Results: Of 112 patients, 38 patients were treated with open reduction internal fixation via a dorsal approach and 68 patients were treated using a volar approach. Except for wrist flexion, there were no other statistical differences in the clinical results between groups for both subjective and objective parameters. There were no statistically significant differences in the complication rates between the volar and dorsal plated groups. One serious complication occurred after volar plating. The most common reason for choosing dorsal plating was irreducible dorsal die-punch fractures. Conclusions: The treatment of displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures with a dorsally versus a volarly placed interlocking plate system demonstrated similar clinical results. Postoperative complications were not readily observed in the patients treated with a dorsal locking plate. Certain fracture patterns are more appropriately stabilized using a dorsal plate fixation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-500
Author(s):  
Takashi Matsumoto ◽  
Toshio Inoue ◽  
Nobuhiro Ikari ◽  
Hitoshi Shirachi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document