scholarly journals Urinary prostate specific antigen: Is the clinical use likely?

2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Pejcic ◽  
J. Hadzi-Djokic ◽  
M. Acimovic ◽  
C. Topuzovic ◽  
B. Milkovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Volunteers ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Trus Biopsy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Prostate Diseases

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood test represents the standard procedure in prostate cancer (CaP) diagnosis and follow-up. However, determination of PSA in the urine, where PSA is present in much higher concentrations than in the blood, still remains in the field of research. Objectives: To determine urinary concentrations of PSA (uPSA) in different groups of patients (pts.), and to estimate is it possible to differentiate benign and malignant prostate diseases and to follow-up the results of treatment. Methods: Between January 2001. and November 2003., urinary concentrations of PSA were determined at 142 pts. divided in seven groups: 1. young and healthy volunteers, 2. "BPH-24": pts. with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who collected the sample of 24- hour voided urine, 3. "BPH-I": pts. with BPH who collected the first portion of first urinary voiding, 4. "TRUS-CaP": pts. with CaP which gave the first portion of urine just prior to transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS- biopsy), 5. "TRUSnon- CaP": pts. who gave first portion of urine prior to TRUS-biopsy, but biopsy did not prove the presence of CaP, 6. "RRP": pts. who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), 7. "AAT": pts. who underwent androgen deprivation therapy. Results: Average uPSA value in the group of young and healthy volunteers, was 13.8+19.6 ng/ml, in "BPH-24": 38.0+ 44.4 ng/ml, in "BPH-I": 140.8+140.9 ng/ml, in "TRUSCaP": 234.8+277.7 ng/ml, in TRUS-non-CaP: 113.1 +148.5 ng/ml, and in the group "RRP": 4.4+4.7 ng/ml. There was no statistically significant difference of average uPSA values between "BPH-I" and "TRUSCaP" groups. The significant difference was found between the group of young volunteers and "BPH-I". In "TRUS-CaP" group, there was strong correlation between tumor size and aggressiveness and uPSA concentration. Finally, PSA and uPSA decline during androgen deprivation therapy, strongly correlated (up to r=0.95). Conclusions: Determination of uPSA cannot differentiate BPH and CaP. However, in the group of pts. with proven localized CaP, uPSA can provide additional information concerning T-staging. Moreover, simultaneous monitoring of PSA and uPSA response on hormonal therapy, can provide an early recognition of androgen-in different CaP (AIPCA) and hormone resistant CaP (HRPCA).

scholarly journals Prostate-specific antigen dynamics after neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy and carbon ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0241636
Author(s):  
Yosuke Takakusagi ◽  
Takahiro Oike ◽  
Kio Kano ◽  
Wataru Anno ◽  
Keisuke Tsuchida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Carbon Ion Radiotherapy ◽  
Carbon Ion ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Psa Bounce ◽  
Psa Failure

Background This study aimed to explain the dynamics of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in patients with prostate cancer who were treated with carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) and neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Methods Eighty-five patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer who received CIRT and neoadjuvant ADT from December 2015 to December 2017 were analyzed in the present study. The total dose of CIRT was set at 51.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) delivered in 12 fractions over 3 weeks. The PSA bounce was defined as a ≥0.4 ng/ml increase of PSA levels from the nadir, followed by any decrease. PSA failure was defined using the Phoenix criteria. Results The median patient age was 68 (range, 48–81) years. The median follow-up duration was 33 (range, 20–48) months. The clinical T stage was T1c, T2a, and T2b in 27, 44, and 14 patients, respectively. The Gleason score was 6 in 3 patients and 7 in 82 patients. The median pretreatment PSA level was 7.37 (range, 3.33–19.0) ng/ml. All patients received neoadjuvant ADT for a median of 6 (range, 2–117) months. PSA bounces were observed in 39 patients (45.9%), occurring a median of 12 (range, 6–30) months after CIRT. PSA failure was observed in eight patients (9.4%), occurring a median of 21 (range, 15–33) months after CIRT. The 3-year PSA failure-free survival rate was 88.5%. No clinical recurrence was observed during the follow-up period. Younger age and lower T stage were significant predictors of PSA bounce. Younger age was a significant predictor of PSA failure. Conclusions In this study, we identified the significant predictors of the occurrence of PSA bounce and failure. Further follow-up is needed to reveal the clinical significance of PSA dynamics.

scholarly journals Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Nadir and the Risk of Death From Prostate Cancer Following Radiation and Androgen Deprivation Therapy

Urology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 145-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke R.G. Pike ◽  
Jing Wu ◽  
Ming-Hui Chen ◽  
Marian Loffredo ◽  
Andrew A. Renshaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Risk Of Death

scholarly journals ETS-related gene(ERG) expression as a predictor of oncological outcomes in patients with high-grade prostate cancer treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy: a cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e025161
Author(s):  
Mark Rezk ◽  
Ashish Chandra ◽  
Daniel Addis ◽  
Henrik Møller ◽  
Mina Youssef ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Related Gene

ObjectivesTo determine whetherETS-related gene(ERG) expression can be used as a biomarker to predict biochemical recurrence and prostate cancer-specific death in patients with high Gleason grade prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as monotherapy.MethodsA multicentre retrospective cohort study identifying 149 patients treated with primary ADT for metastatic or non-metastatic prostate cancer with Gleason score 8–10 between 1999 and 2006. Patients planned for adjuvant radiotherapy at diagnosis were excluded. Age at diagnosis, ethnicity, prostate-specific antigen and Charlson-comorbidity score were recorded. Prostatic tissue acquired at biopsy or transurethral resection surgery was assessed for immunohistochemical expression ofERG. Failure of ADT defined as prostate specific antigen nadir +2. Vital status and death certification data determined using the UK National Cancer Registry. Primary outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and prostate cancer specific survival (CSS). Secondary outcome was biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS).ResultsThe median OS of our cohort was 60.2 months (CI 52.0 to 68.3).ERGexpression observed in 51/149 cases (34%). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed no significant association betweenERGexpression and OS (p=0.41), CSS (p=0.92) and BRFS (p=0.31). Cox regression analysis showed Gleason score (p=0.003) and metastatic status (p<1×10-5) to be the only significant predictors of prostate CSS.ConclusionsNo significant association was found betweenERGstatus and any of our outcome measures. Despite a limited sample size, our results suggest thatERGdoes not appear to be a useful biomarker in predicting response to ADT in patients with high risk prostate cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document