scholarly journals Inicijalna dijagnostika intraabdominalnog krvavljenja uzrokovano izolovanom povredom slezine kod tupe abdominalne traume

2003 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 129-133
Author(s):  
Srdjan Dikic ◽  
Dragoljub Bilanovic ◽  
Tomislav Randjelovic ◽  
D. Radovanovic ◽  
Miroslav Granic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Bleeding Control ◽  
Bleeding Source ◽  
Intraabdominal Bleeding ◽  
Bleeding Area ◽  
Conservative Attitude

Diagnosis of intraabdominal bleeding caused by spleen injury must be performed in the shortest possible period of time, with little risk for the patient, and with high preciseness. By its simple performance, high preciseness and little risk for the patient, DPL imposes as the predominant method in initial diagnostic of intraabdominal bleeding. Control and monitoring of lavage may duly signalize degree of bleeding. Preciseness of this diagnostic in our series ranges up to 93.3%. DPL method is especially important in a combined neurotrauma. Ultrasonography is a sovereign method in diagnostic of bleeding source as well as in monitoring of bleeding that from the very beginning does not require urgent surgical intervention. Its importance is in monitoring both intrasplenic and subcapsulary hematomas. It is not appliable in disturbed and haemodynamically unstable patients. It is in particular important in children where a maximum conservative attitude with respect to operative treatment has been assumed. CT takes the leading place with respect to preciseness of bleeding area, and the combined thoracoabdominal trauma. Preciseness of CT in our series comes up to 96.6%, but can be applied only in haemodynamically stable patients. Same as US of abdomen so the CT of abdomen represents a prominent method in monitoring of both intrasplenic and subcapsular hematomas, which do not require urgent surgical intervention.

scholarly journals Change in Functional Impairment, Disability, and Quality of Life Following Operative Treatment for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 53S-69S ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Fehlings ◽  
Lindsay A. Tetreault ◽  
Shekar Kurpad ◽  
Darrel S. Brodke ◽  
Jefferson R. Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Functional Impairment ◽  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
The Impact

Study Design: Systematic review. Objectives: The primary objective of this systematic review was to define the change in impairment, disability, and pain following surgical intervention in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Secondary objectives included to assess the impact of preoperative disease severity and duration of symptoms on outcomes and to summarize complications associated with surgery. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify prospective studies evaluating the effectiveness and safety of operative treatment in patients with DCM. Outcomes of interest were functional status, disability, pain, and complications. The quality of each study was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the strength of the overall body of evidence was rated using guidelines outlined by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. Results: Of the 385 retrieved citations, 32 met inclusion criteria and are summarized in this review. Based on our results, pooled standard mean differences showed a large effect for improvement in Japanese Orthopaedic Association or modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score from baseline at short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up: 6 to 12 months (1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.41 to 2.43), 13 to 36 months (1.40; 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.67), and ≥36 months (1.92; 95% CI = 1.14 to 2.69) (moderate evidence). Surgery also resulted in significant improvements in Nurick, Neck Disability Index, and Visual Analogue Scale scores (low to very low evidence). The cumulative incidence of complications was low (14.1%; 95% CI = 10.1% to 18.2%). Conclusion: Surgical intervention for DCM results in significant improvements in functional impairment, disability, and pain and is associated with an acceptably low rate of complications.

CT-Angiography for the Detection of a Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding Source

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 392-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Duchesne ◽  
T. Jacome ◽  
M. Serou ◽  
D. Tighe ◽  
A. Gonzales ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Ct Angiography ◽  
Diagnostic Algorithm ◽  
Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Bleeding Source ◽  
Early Evaluation ◽  
Contrast Volume ◽  
Bleeding Area ◽  
Contrast Angiography ◽  
Venous Bleeding

The evaluation of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) often involves the collaborative efforts of the gastroenterologist, radiologist, and surgeon. Efforts to localize the acute LGIB have traditionally involved colonoscopy, technetium-labeled red blood cell (RBC) scintigraphy, angiography, or a combination of these modalities. The sensitivity of each method of diagnosis is limited, with the most common cause of a negative study the spontaneous cessation of hemorrhage. Other technical factors include vasospasm, lack of adequate contrast volume or exposure time, a venous bleeding source, and a large surface bleeding area. We report the use of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), or CT-angiography (CT-A), in the initial evaluation of LGIB, and speculate on the incorporation of this technique into a diagnostic algorithm to treat LGIB. MDCT may offer a very sensitive means to evaluate the source of acute LGIB, while avoiding some of the morbidity and intense resource use of contrast angiography, and may provide unique morphologic information regarding the type of pathology. Screening with the more rapid and available MDCT, followed by either directed therapeutic angiography or surgical management, may represent a reasonable algorithm for the early evaluation and management of acute LGIB in which an active bleeding source is strongly suspected.

Results of non-operative treatment following hip fracture compared to surgical intervention

Injury ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 418-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hossain ◽  
V. Neelapala ◽  
J.G. Andrew
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Surgical Intervention

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Non-operative Treatment of Symptomatic Accessory Navicular in Pediatric Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0034
Author(s):  
Malynda Messer ◽  
Candice Brady ◽  
Kristin Cola ◽  
Jaime Rice-Denning
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Type I ◽  
First Line ◽  
Complete Pain Relief ◽  
Accessory Navicular

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Initial management of symptomatic accessory naviculae in pediatric patients is nonoperative. Common first line treatments include casting, shoe wear modification, limiting strenuous activities, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories. When nonoperative treatments fail to mitigate symptoms, surgery is indicated. Surgical treatment of symptomatic accessory navicular bones has been extensively studied. However, the efficacy of nonoperative treatment for alleviating pain or preventing surgery in effected patients has not been established. We believe that nonoperative treatment is frequently unsuccessful or does not give lasting pain relief, thus questioning whether surgery could be offered as first line treatment. Our study retrospectively reviews outcomes of adolescents treated non-operatively for symptomatic accessory naviculae in an effort to provide clinicians success rates for their discussion of treatment options with patients and their families. Methods: This is an IRB approved, retrospective study of adolescent patients diagnosed and treated non-operatively for symptomatic accessory navicular bones at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center between the dates 8/1/2006 and 8/24/2016. Medical records were used to identify demographic information, type, duration, and total trials of conservative treatment, additional foot comorbidities, response to conservative management, and surgery if non-operative management failed. Included patients were under 18 years of age with medial sided foot pain, radiographic evidence of an accessory navicular, and had undergone at least 1 course of non-operative treatment. Patients with previously operated on accessory naviculars or other diagnosed painful foot conditions were excluded. Outcome measures consisted of pain relief, no surgical intervention, or need for surgical intervention. Available radiographic imaging for each patient was also used to identify type of accessory navicular and determine pes planus incidence. Statistical analysis using measures of central tendency was then performed. Results: 169 patients were included, with 226 symptomatic accessory naviculae. Average age at diagnosis was 11.8 years, with 78.2% females, and 22% males. 53 (32%) were left symptomatic accessory naviculae, 56 (33%) right, and 60 (36%) bilateral. Type II accessory naviculae were most frequent (72.7%), with Type I and Type III in 9.7% and 17.4%, respectively. 56% were chronic in nature, with 31% due to acute injury. Average number of non-operative trials was 2.08, with 28% experiencing complete pain relief, 30% requiring surgical intervention, and 41% that did not require surgical intervention, but were without documented pain relief. Of those that achieved complete pain relief, average length of non-operative treatment was 8.03 months. Conclusion: Results of this study can be used by clinicians to frame discussions surrounding treatment options for symptomatic accessory navicular bones with both patients and their families. Further research is warranted to determine the necessary duration and type of non-operative treatment, among those most commonly used, that is most successful in providing pain relief.

scholarly journals Developing a Clinical Prediction Model for Failed Nonoperative Management of SLAP Tears (220)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0032
Author(s):  
Elyse Berlinberg ◽  
Matthew Kingery ◽  
Amit Manjunath ◽  
Danielle Markus ◽  
Eric Strauss
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Model ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Clinical Prediction ◽  
Shoulder Injury ◽  
Clinical Prediction Model ◽  
Non Operative Management

Objectives: Patients with a superior labral anterior to posterior (SLAP) tear of the shoulder are often initially treated non-operatively, but many do not respond and require surgery. Identifying patients who are likely to fail non-operative management and would benefit from early surgical intervention can shorten time of disability and limit resources utilized on unsuccessful treatments. The purpose of this study is to create a clinical prediction model to determine which patients are likely to fail non-operative treatment of SLAP tears and require surgical intervention. Methods: This was a case-control study consisting of patients treated at a single institution for isolated, non-degenerative SLAP tears. Patients with concomitant rotator cuff tears were excluded from this analysis. Patients were retrospectively surveyed using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) system regarding clinical features of their shoulder injury, non-operative treatments that they received, and key functional outcomes during their post-injury period. Responders underwent additional medical record review to identify other variables related to the clinical presentation and treatment of their shoulder injury. In order to simplify the predictive model and optimize its interpretability, the lasso (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) method of penalized logistic regression analysis was used to identify the characteristics that were most closely associated with failure of nonoperative treatment. The data was randomly split into a training set and test set. Using the training set, the value of lambda which minimized cross-validation prediction error rate was determined (Figure 1). The final lasso model was then computed. The predictive accuracy of the final model was assessed using the test data set. Results: Overall, 189 patients were contacted and included in the analysis. The mean age of included patients was 29.9 +/- 6.7 years. Thirty-eight patients (20.1%) were female. One hundred and six patients (56.1%) failed non-operative management and required surgical intervention. The final lasso model identified a total of 9 variables that were significantly associated with failure of non-operative management of SLAP tears (Table 1). These predictors included pre-injury overhead sports participation, presence of specific symptoms, severity of pain, and the type of non-operative treatment modalities used. Injury to the dominant extremity, history of prior shoulder injury, patient age, use of NSAIDs, and occupation involving manual labor or overhead work were not associated with failure of nonoperative treatment. The predictive accuracy of the model was 70.3% (95% CI 53.0%, 84.1%). Sensitivity of the model was 81.0% and specificity was 56.3%. Conclusions: A clinical prediction model consisting of variables describing patient characteristics, specific symptoms, and the type of non-operative treatment modalities utilized was found to predict failure of non-operative management of SLAP tears with moderate accuracy. Further refinements of this prediction model, including the inclusion of additional physical examination and imaging variables, will be required before future iterations are tested in clinical practice.

scholarly journals On the issue of surgical intervention for hydronephrosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-356
Author(s):  
A. Dranitsyn
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Genital Area ◽  
Differential Methods

Despite the fact that the clinical history and operative treatment of hydronephrosis belong to the so-called brilliant period of abdominal surgery, which came from the time of the introduction of antiseptics and asepsis, however, no indication or differential methods of diagnostics in perfection, which we see, for example, with the treatment of brushes and other tumors of the genital area.

scholarly journals Management of pediatric blunt abdominal trauma: تدبير رضوح البطن الكليلة عند الأطفال

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 27-20
Author(s):  
Wassem Ameer Shater, Mohammad Ali Nasser, Ali Mohammad Allou Wassem Ameer Shater, Mohammad Ali Nasser, Ali Mohammad Allou
Keyword(s):  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Pancreatic Injury ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Abdominal Injuries ◽  
Non Operative Management

Aim of study: Evaluating a non- operative treatment of pediatric blunt abdominal trauma and avoiding unnecessary surgical intervention in Tishreen University Hospital. Methods: During years (2016- 2020) a retroprospective study was conducted on 62 children who had isolated blunt abdominal trauma or associated with other injuries, most of them were managed by non- operative treatment but some required surgical management. Results: Non- operative management of pediatric blunt abdominal injuries was applied for 59 patients, three patients required a surgical procedure, the spleen was the most organ exposed to injury (40) child, followed by liver (26) child, kidney (4) and (1) pancreatic injury. Non- operative management was successful in most solid organs injuries with grades 1, 2 and 3, but it failed in 5 grade splenic injury. one out of two hollow viscus injuries required surgical intervention. There were no statistical differences between the study groups in age, gender and injury mechanism. Hospital length of stay was significantly longer in patients who underwent a laparotomy (6) days compared to other non- operative patients (3) days, one complication occurred during non- operative management as pseudocyst after pancreatic injury, (4) patient died in the non- operative group due to hemodynamic instability and associated severe cerebral injuries. Conclusion: It is safe to treat most children with blunt abdominal injuries non- operatively if monitoring is adequate with hemodynamic stability.

scholarly journals The Elbow UCL Injury Prognosis Score

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0036
Author(s):  
Elizabeth R. Dennis ◽  
John D. Mueller ◽  
Danica D. Vance ◽  
Kayla E. Neville ◽  
Nicole K. Skursky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Non Operative Management ◽  
Prognosis Score

Objectives: No model exists to predict which patients with elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries will successfully return to play (RTP) with non-operative treatment. The reported rates for successful RTP after non-operative management of UCL injuries are limited and vary widely. Furthermore, patient and UCL injury characteristics that influence failure of non-operative treatment have not been established. We sought to identify which factors were most significant in predicting which patients would have successful RTP after non-operative management of UCL injury. In doing so, we created the Elbow UCL Injury Prognosis Score to identify and weigh factors that predict failure of non-operative treatment. The parameters include: age, position, competition level, moving valgus stress test (MVST), 5th finger sensation, UCL tenderness, and MRI findings including tear type, location, and chronicity features. This score will predict which patients will succeed non-operative management, avoiding unnecessary surgery while simultaneously identify patients for whom non-operative management would be delaying the inevitable need for surgical intervention. Methods: 205 patients were evaluated by the senior author for a UCL injury. Physical exam findings, imaging characteristics and patient demographics were retrospectively collected and entered into a HIPAA-compliant REDCap database after IRB approval of the study design. Of these patients, 138 underwent a trial of non-operative treatment and were either cleared for RTP (n= 55) or eventually underwent surgical intervention (n= 83) after a minimum one-month trial of non-operative management. Sixty-seven patients decided to have surgery immediately without trialing non-operative management and were excluded from the scoring system. The Elbow UCL Injury Prognosis Score was developed and validated using stepwise feature selection by Akaike information criterion (AIC). Three-fold cross validation was performed using these ten variables as predictors. The mean and standard deviation of area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were evaluated. Results: The area under curve for non-operative failure predicting non-operative management failure was 0.79 (0.054), with sensitivity=0.85 (0.088), specificity=0.72 (0.032), positive predictive value=0.83 (0.023), negative predictive value=0.77 (0.091) [mean (standard deviation (SD))]. Patients were predicted to succeed non-operative management if they scored less than 10, while for a score greater than or equal to 10 patients would likely fail non-operative management and require surgical intervention for their UCL injury (Table 1). Conclusion: The Elbow UCL Injury Prognosis Score is a statistically rigorous, powerful tool for predicting which patients will most likely RTP with non-operative treatment. We hope this score can provide surgeons with a useful tool to enhance and enable shared decision making with patients when faced with UCL injuries at all competitive levels. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Factors Predicting the Need for Early Surgical Intervention for Small Bowel Obstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Jae Cho ◽  
In Seok Park ◽  
Jungbin Kim ◽  
Hyun Jin Cho ◽  
Geum Hee Gwak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Group ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Small Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Leukocyte Counts

Purpose: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common disease that requires hospitalization. The most common cause of SBO is postoperative adhesion. Delayed timing of operations in patients who need surgical intervention results in mortality or morbidity. A number of studies on SBO have established criteria for emergency surgery. However, few objective clinical parameters are available for screening patients who need a delayed operation. Therefore, we analyzed factors that affect the clinical course of SBO to select appropriate therapeutic plans for reducing the risk of complications in these patients.Methods: We investigated the clinical characteristics of patients admitted to the surgery department of our hospital between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016, who were diagnosed with SBO. Patients were divided into an operative treatment group (n = 12) and a conservative treatment group (n = 96). We compared clinical characteristics between the 2 groups.Results: The operative treatment group underwent more operations before SBO than the conservative treatment group (P = 0.007). Initial leukocyte counts (P = 0.004) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (P = 0.028) were elevated in the operative group. Body mass index (BMI) was lower in the operative group (P = 0.013).Conclusion: The number of operations before SBO, leukocyte counts, CRP levels, and BMI were useful parameters for selecting patients who needed an urgent operation for SBO.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document