scholarly journals Perfect and quasiperfect domination in trees

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-64
Author(s):  
José Cáceres ◽  
Carmen Hernando ◽  
Mercè Mora ◽  
Ignacio Pelayo ◽  
María Puertas
Keyword(s):  
Positive Integer ◽  
Upper Bound ◽  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Linear Algorithm ◽  
G 12 ◽  
Graph Parameters

A k??quasiperfect dominating set of a connected graph G is a vertex subset S such that every vertex not in S is adjacent to at least one and at most k vertices in S. The cardinality of a minimum k-quasiperfect dominating set in G is denoted by ?1k(G). These graph parameters were first introduced by Chellali et al. (2013) as a generalization of both the perfect domination number ?11(G) and the domination number ?(G). The study of the so-called quasiperfect domination chain ?11(G) ? ?12(G)?... ? ?1?(G) = ?(G) enable us to analyze how far minimum dominating sets are from being perfect. In this paper, we provide, for any tree T and any positive integer k, a tight upper bound of ?1k(T). We also prove that there are trees satisfying all possible equalities and inequalities in this chain. Finally a linear algorithm for computing ?1k(T) in any tree T is presented.

The minimum eccentric distance sum of trees with given distance k-domination number

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (04) ◽  
pp. 2050052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidan Pei ◽  
Xiangfeng Pan
Keyword(s):  
Positive Integer ◽  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Number Formula ◽  
Simple Connected Graph ◽  
Eccentric Distance ◽  
Distance Formula

Let [Formula: see text] be a positive integer and [Formula: see text] be a simple connected graph. The eccentric distance sum of [Formula: see text] is defined as [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the maximum distance from [Formula: see text] to any other vertex and [Formula: see text] is the sum of all distances from [Formula: see text]. A set [Formula: see text] is a distance [Formula: see text]-dominating set of [Formula: see text] if for every vertex [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] for some vertex [Formula: see text]. The minimum cardinality among all distance [Formula: see text]-dominating sets of [Formula: see text] is called the distance [Formula: see text]-domination number [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text]. In this paper, the trees among all [Formula: see text]-vertex trees with distance [Formula: see text]-domination number [Formula: see text] having the minimal eccentric distance sum are determined.

scholarly journals Distance Domination and Distance Irredundance in Graphs

10.37236/953 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Hansberg ◽  
Dirk Meierling ◽  
Lutz Volkmann
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Distance Domination

A set $D\subseteq V$ of vertices is said to be a (connected) distance $k$-dominating set of $G$ if the distance between each vertex $u\in V-D$ and $D$ is at most $k$ (and $D$ induces a connected graph in $G$). The minimum cardinality of a (connected) distance $k$-dominating set in $G$ is the (connected) distance $k$-domination number of $G$, denoted by $\gamma_k(G)$ ($\gamma_k^c(G)$, respectively). The set $D$ is defined to be a total $k$-dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V$ is within distance $k$ from some vertex of $D$ other than itself. The minimum cardinality among all total $k$-dominating sets of $G$ is called the total $k$-domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $\gamma_k^t(G)$. For $x\in X\subseteq V$, if $N^k[x]-N^k[X-x]\neq\emptyset$, the vertex $x$ is said to be $k$-irredundant in $X$. A set $X$ containing only $k$-irredundant vertices is called $k$-irredundant. The $k$-irredundance number of $G$, denoted by $ir_k(G)$, is the minimum cardinality taken over all maximal $k$-irredundant sets of vertices of $G$. In this paper we establish lower bounds for the distance $k$-irredundance number of graphs and trees. More precisely, we prove that ${5k+1\over 2}ir_k(G)\geq \gamma_k^c(G)+2k$ for each connected graph $G$ and $(2k+1)ir_k(T)\geq\gamma_k^c(T)+2k\geq |V|+2k-kn_1(T)$ for each tree $T=(V,E)$ with $n_1(T)$ leaves. A class of examples shows that the latter bound is sharp. The second inequality generalizes a result of Meierling and Volkmann and Cyman, Lemańska and Raczek regarding $\gamma_k$ and the first generalizes a result of Favaron and Kratsch regarding $ir_1$. Furthermore, we shall show that $\gamma_k^c(G)\leq{3k+1\over2}\gamma_k^t(G)-2k$ for each connected graph $G$, thereby generalizing a result of Favaron and Kratsch regarding $k=1$.

Double hop dominating sets in graphs

2020 ◽  
pp. 2150057
Author(s):  
Reynaldo V. Mollejon ◽  
Sergio R. Canoy
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Binary Operations

Let [Formula: see text] be a connected graph of order [Formula: see text]. A subset [Formula: see text] is a double hop dominating set (or a double [Formula: see text]-step dominating set) if [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text], for each [Formula: see text]. The smallest cardinality of a double hop dominating set of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], is the double hop domination number of [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we investigate the concept of double hop dominating sets and study it for graphs resulting from some binary operations.

On the minimum vertex covering transversal dominating sets in graphs and their classification

2017 ◽  
Vol 09 (05) ◽  
pp. 1750069 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Vasanthi ◽  
K. Subramanian
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Vertex Covering ◽  
Number Formula ◽  
Covering Set ◽  
Simple Connected Graph

Let [Formula: see text] be a simple and connected graph. A dominating set [Formula: see text] is said to be a vertex covering transversal dominating set if it intersects every minimum vertex covering set of [Formula: see text]. The vertex covering transversal domination number [Formula: see text] is the minimum cardinality among all vertex covering transversal dominating sets of [Formula: see text]. A vertex covering transversal dominating set of minimum cardinality [Formula: see text] is called a minimum vertex covering transversal dominating set or simply a [Formula: see text]-set. In this paper, we prove some general theorems on the vertex covering transversal domination number of a simple connected graph. We also provide some results about [Formula: see text]-sets and try to classify those sets based on their intersection with the minimum vertex covering sets.

scholarly journals On Resolving Hop Domination in Graphs

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 1015-1023
Author(s):  
Jerson Saguin Mohamad ◽  
Helen M. Rara
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Lexicographic Product ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Resolving Set ◽  
Domination In Graphs

A set S of vertices in a connected graph G is a resolving hop dominating set of G if S is a resolving set in G and for every vertex v ∈ V (G) \ S there exists u ∈ S such that dG(u, v) = 2. The smallest cardinality of such a set S is called the resolving hop domination number of G. This paper presents the characterizations of the resolving hop dominating sets in the join, corona and lexicographic product of two graphs and determines the exact values of their corresponding resolving hop domination number.

scholarly journals On Strong Resolving Domination in the Join and Corona of Graphs

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 170-179
Author(s):  
Gerald Bacon Monsanto ◽  
Penelyn L. Acal ◽  
Helen M. Rara
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets

Let G be a connected graph. A subset S \subseteq V(G) is a strong resolving dominating set of G if S is a dominating set and for every pair of vertices u,v \in V(G), there exists a vertex w \in S such that u \in I_G[v,w] or v \in I_G[u,w]. The smallest cardinality of a strong resolving dominating set of G is called the strong resolving domination number of G. In this paper, we characterize the strong resolving dominating sets in the join and corona of graphs and determine the bounds or exact values of the strong resolving domination number of these graphs.

scholarly journals Locating-Total Domination Number of Cacti Graphs

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Jianxin Wei ◽  
Uzma Ahmad ◽  
Saira Hameed ◽  
Javaria Hanif
Keyword(s):  
Upper Bound ◽  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Total Domination ◽  
Total Domination Number ◽  
Unicyclic Graphs ◽  
Total Dominating Set ◽  
Bicyclic Graphs ◽  
Number Of Cycles

For a connected graph J, a subset W ⊆ V J is termed as a locating-total dominating set if for a ∈ V J ,   N a ∩ W ≠ ϕ , and for a ,   b ∈ V J − W ,   N a ∩ W ≠ N b ∩ W . The number of elements in a smallest such subset is termed as the locating-total domination number of J. In this paper, the locating-total domination number of unicyclic graphs and bicyclic graphs are studied and their bounds are presented. Then, by using these bounds, an upper bound for cacti graphs in terms of their order and number of cycles is estimated. Moreover, the exact values of this domination variant for some families of cacti graphs including tadpole graphs and rooted products are also determined.

scholarly journals The edge-to-edge geodetic domination number of a graph

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 635-658
Author(s):  
J. John ◽  
V. Sujin Flower
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
General Properties ◽  
Geodetic Number ◽  
Geodetic Set ◽  
Positive Integers

Let G = (V, E) be a connected graph with at least three vertices. A set S ⊆ E(G) is called an edge-to-edge geodetic dominating set of G if S is both an edge-to-edge geodetic set of G and an edge dominating set of G. The edge-to-edge geodetic domination number γgee(G) of G is the minimum cardinality of its edge-to-edge geodetic dominating sets. Some general properties satisfied by this concept are studied. Connected graphs of size m with edge-to-edge geodetic domination number 2 or m or m − 1 are characterized. We proved that if G is a connected graph of size m ≥ 4 and Ḡ is also connected, then 4 ≤ γgee(G) + γgee(Ḡ) ≤ 2m − 2. Moreover we characterized graphs for which the lower and the upper bounds are sharp. It is shown that, for every pair of positive integers a, b with 2 ≤ a ≤ b, there exists a connected graph G with gee(G) = a and γgee(G) = b. Also it is shown that, for every pair of positive integers a and b with 2 < a ≤ b, there exists a connected graph G with γe(G) = a and γgee(G) = b, where γe(G) is the edge domination number of G and gee(G) is the edge-to-edge geodetic number of G.

scholarly journals Hop Dominating Sets in Graphs Under Binary Operations

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1455-1463
Author(s):  
Sergio Canoy, Jr ◽  
Reynaldo Villarobe Mollejon ◽  
John Gabriel E. Canoy
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Binary Operations ◽  
Simple Connected Graph

Let G be a (simple) connected graph with vertex and edge sets V (G) and E(G),respectively. A set S ⊆ V (G) is a hop dominating set of G if for each v ∈ V (G) \ S, there exists w ∈ S such that dG(v, w) = 2. The minimum cardinality of a hop dominating set of G, denoted by γh(G), is called the hop domination number of G. In this paper we revisit the concept of hop domination, relate it with other domination concepts, and investigate it in graphs resulting from some binary operations.

Connected monophonic domination in graphs

2020 ◽  
pp. 2150029
Author(s):  
A. Sadiquali ◽  
P. Arul Paul Sudhahar ◽  
V. Lakshmana Gomathi Nayagam
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Connected Graphs ◽  
Domination In Graphs ◽  
Initial Results

A collection of vertices in different connected graphs embraces a wholesome shift into a new collection with the properties of the couplets monophonic and dominating sets. The new collection of vertices and associated invariant with the new behavior of connected graphs are called as connected monophonic dominating set (cmd-set) and connected monophonic domination number (cmd-number), respectively. Certain initial results are studied. The cmd-number is characterized with some conditions. Some realization problems related to a connected graph by imposing conditions on the vertex count are also presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document