scholarly journals Use of point-of-care tests among general practitioners: a cross-sectional study in Saxony, Germany

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Frese ◽  
Kathleen Steger ◽  
Tobias Deutsch ◽  
Gordian Schmid ◽  
Hagen Sandholzer
Keyword(s):  
General Practitioners ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Point Of Care Tests

Analytical performance of eight rapid point-of-care tests routinely used for the detection of HBsAg in Burkina Faso: A cross-sectional study

2020 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 104546
Author(s):  
Armel M. Sanou ◽  
Rayana Toyé ◽  
Thérèse Kagoné ◽  
Abdoulaye Nikiéma ◽  
Jean Testa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Burkina Faso ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Analytical Performance ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Point Of Care Tests

scholarly journals Chronic stress, work-related daily challenges and medicolegal investigations: a cross-sectional study among German general practitioners

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Kersting ◽  
Lena Zimmer ◽  
Anika Thielmann ◽  
Birgitta Weltermann
Keyword(s):  
Regression Model ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Chronic Stress ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
High Strain ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Work Related

Abstract Background The prevalence of chronic stress among German general practitioners (GPs) was shown to be twice as high as in the general population. Because chronic stress negatively influences well-being and poor physician well-being is associated with poor patient outcomes, targeted strategies are needed. This analysis focuses on work-related factors associated with high chronic stress in GPs. Methods This cross-sectional study measured chronic stress among German GPs using the validated and standardized Trier Inventory for the Assessment of Chronic Stress (TICS-SSCS). Based on the TICS, GPs were categorized as either having low strain (≤ 25th percentile) or high strain (≥ 75th percentile) due to chronic stress. Questions on work-related challenges assessed the frequency and the subjectively perceived strain of single challenges. For exploratory analyses, these items were combined to dichotomous variables reflecting challenges that are common and that cause high strain. Variables significant in bivariate analyses were included in a multivariate logistic regression model analyzing their association with high chronic stress. Results Data of 109 GPs categorized as having low strain (n = 53) or high strain (n = 56) due to chronic stress were analyzed. Based on bivariate analyses, challenges regarding personnel matters, practice software, complexity of patients, difficult patients, care facilities, scheduling of appointments, keeping medical records up-to-date, fee structures, and expectations versus reality of care were included in the regression model. Keeping medical records up-to-date had the strongest association with high chronic stress (odds ratio 4.95, 95% confidence interval 1.29–19.06). A non-significant trend showed that medicolegal investigations were more common among GPs with high chronic stress. Conclusions This exploratory research shows that chronic stress is predominantly associated with administrative challenges. Treatment documentation, which represents a legal safeguard and is closely linked to existential concerns, has the strongest influence.

The utility of a point-of-care sural nerve conduction device for detection of diabetic polyneuropathy: A cross-sectional study

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa A. Kural ◽  
Signe T. Andersen ◽  
Niels T. Andersen ◽  
Henning Andersen ◽  
Morten Charles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Conduction ◽  
Sural Nerve ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Diabetic Polyneuropathy ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional

scholarly journals Collaboration amongst general practitioners and gynaecologists working in primary health care in Germany: a cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Trusch ◽  
Christoph Heintze ◽  
Elena Petelos ◽  
Lorena Dini
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Postal Survey ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Healthcare Provision ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Federal States ◽  
Key Competencies

Abstract Aim: This cross-sectional study is the first one to explore the collaboration of the influencing factors thereof amongst general practitioners (GPs) and gynaecologists (Gyns) working in primary care in urban and rural settings in Germany. Background: The number of women aged ≥ 50 years is predicted to increase in the next years in Germany. This coincides with the ageing of primary care specialists providing outpatient care. Whereas delegation of tasks to nurses as a form of interprofessional collaboration has been the target of recent studies, there is no data regarding collaboration amongst physicians in different specialisations working in primary care. We explored collaboration amongst GPs and Gyn regarding the healthcare provision to women aged ≥ 50 years. Methods: A quantitative postal survey was administered to GPs and Gyns in three federal states in Germany, focusing on care provision to women aged ≥ 50 years. A total of 4545 physicians, comprising 3514 GPs (67% of the total GP population) randomly selected, and all 1031 Gyns practicing in these states received the postal survey in March 2018. A single reminder was sent in April 2018 with data collection ending in June 2018. Multiple logistic regressions were performed for collaboration, adjusted by age and sex, alongside descriptive methods. Findings: The overall response rate was 31% (1389 respondents): 861 GPs (25%) and 528 Gyns (51%), with the mean respondent age being 54.4 years. Seventy-two per cent were female. Key competencies of collaboration are associated with working in rural federal states and with network participation. Physicians from rural states [odds ratio (OR) = 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2, 1.9] and physicians in networks (OR = 3.0, CI = 2.3, 3.9) were more satisfied with collaboration. Collaboration to deliver services for women aged ≥ 50 years is more systematic amongst GPs and Gyns who are members of a network; increased networking could improve collaboration, and ultimately, outcomes too.

scholarly journals Differences in Rate of Complete Excision of Basal Cell Carcinoma by Dermatologists, Plastic Surgeons and General Practitioners: A Large Cross-Sectional Study

Dermatology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 234 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 86-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirtie Ramdas ◽  
Charlotte van Lee ◽  
Samuel Beck ◽  
Patrick Bindels ◽  
Vincent Noordhoek Hegt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Basal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Basal Cell ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Complete Excision ◽  
Cross Sectional
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document