scholarly journals Science learning via participation in online citizen science

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (03) ◽  
pp. A07 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Masters ◽  
Eun Young Oh ◽  
Joe Cox ◽  
Brooke Simmons ◽  
Chris Lintott ◽  
...  

We investigate the development of scientific content knowledge of volunteers participating in online citizen science projects in the Zooniverse (http://www.zooniverse.org). We use econometric methods to test how measures of project participation relate to success in a science quiz, controlling for factors known to correlate with scientific knowledge. Citizen scientists believe they are learning about both the content and processes of science through their participation. We don't directly test the latter, but we find evidence to support the former — that more actively engaged participants perform better in a project-specific science knowledge quiz, even after controlling for their general science knowledge. We interpret this as evidence of learning of science content inspired by participation in online citizen science.

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
Michele Korb ◽  
Danika LeDuc ◽  
Caron Inouyue ◽  
Megan Jensen ◽  
Meff Seitz

Teachers with knowledge of science and science teach-ing pedagogy are essential to teaching science in K-12 schools. We present collaborative efforts among science and science education faculty members that build a sci-ence teacher program with an overarching objective of training qualified science teachers. Our Foundational Level General Science program goes beyond increasing science content knowledge. Its design fosters a sustained collaboration for faculty in science and education to in-tegrate inquiry-based pedagogy into curricula with the goal of recruiting and retaining STEM teachers. Our ex-perience suggests that certain policies within the higher education infrastructure are necessary to sustain these efforts.


Eos ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Weiss

Improved design of citizen science projects in which nonscientists and scientists collaborate can boost the amount of science learning by nonscientists and communities.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Dayle Anderson

<p>Lack of science content knowledge has often been suggested as underpinning primary teachers' reluctance to teach science or to provide limited learning opportunities when doing so. Understanding better the full range and nature of teacher knowledges that afford useful science learning opportunities in primary science education could produce a more positive view of primary teachers' potential for science teaching and usefully inform professional development in science. This research used a multiple case study approach to identify the nature of knowledges and beliefs that three teachers from schools well regarded for teaching science at Years 7 and 8 brought to their implementation of a unit of work in science. Students' perceptions of learning pertaining to the science unit were also examined. The influence of teacher knowledges on opportunities for science learning was considered and the ways in which the teachers developed science related teacher knowledges was investigated. Sociocultural theories of learning underpin this study and the extent to which the teachers incorporated sociocultural approaches in their science teaching was a particular focus. Frameworks guiding the analysis of the range of teacher knowledges and of sociocultural teaching approaches were developed from the literature. Data for each case study included observations and transcripts of recordings of the lessons forming each science unit together with multiple interviews with the teacher throughout its implementation. Interviews with focus students during and following the unit along with responses to a questionnaire completed by the class at the end of the unit provided insights into students’ perceptions of what they had learned. This study found that the teachers drew on a wide range of knowledges and beliefs to promote science learning. The teachers employing sociocultural approaches afforded most syntactic science learning opportunities. Crucially influential on the nature of science learning that was promoted was the teacher's orientation to science teaching, in particular, beliefs about the purposes and nature of science and science teaching. Four processes were identified that facilitated the teachers' development of science and pedagogical content knowledge: intentional development, reflection, repetition, and engaging and observing students in investigating the natural world. The nature of knowledge developed by each teacher was afforded and constrained by their orientation to science teaching and their recognition of and access to, sources of support. Learning science content, i.e., substantive science learning, was identified by students where this had been the focus of learning and assessment opportunities because of their teacher's particular orientation. Learning about the nature of science, i.e., syntactic science learning, was identified where this was the sole focus of learning and assessment opportunities. In the one case where the teacher's orientation afforded both types of learning opportunity with apparently equal emphasis, students more readily identified substantive science ideas over syntactic ideas as new or important learning.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 636-651
Author(s):  
Michael Jordan Raddick ◽  
Edward E. Prather ◽  
Colin S. Wallace

We report the results of a large-scale study of the state of science content knowledge of volunteers in Galaxy Zoo ( www.galaxyzoo.org ), an online citizen science project in which public volunteers classify galaxies in an effort to benefit cutting-edge astronomy research. We were interested in whether participating in Galaxy Zoo leads to any increase in participants’ astrophysical content knowledge. To assess volunteer content knowledge, we examined the responses of 1476 Galaxy Zoo volunteers to 32 conceptually challenging multiple-choice questions. We looked for any relationships between participants’ assessment scores and the number of galaxies classified upon answering the first assessment question, the number of galaxies classified between their first response and their final response to the assessment, and the length of time since they first created their Galaxy Zoo account. All relationships were of small effect size. These results suggest that participation in the project’s central galaxy classification task, in and of itself, is not associated with increased astrophysical content knowledge. We strongly recommend that future studies of online citizen science environments examine how volunteers take advantage of opportunities to develop their knowledge and skills outside of the self-contained central task, especially in the context of opportunities for interactions with other volunteers.


2014 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie R. Medina ◽  
Evan Ortlieb ◽  
Sandra Metoyer

Science content knowledge is a concern for educators in the United States because performance has stagnated for the past decade. Investigators designed this study to determine the current levels of scientific literacy among undergraduate students in a freshman-level biology course (a core requirement for majors and nonmajors), identify factors influencing levels of scientific literacy, and make recommendations for improving scientific literacy. Participants (n = 255) answered a one-time, 18-item life science questionnaire. A significant difference in content knowledge was found between participants who engaged in informal science learning weekly and participants who did not engage in informal science learning (i.e., learning outside the classroom).


Author(s):  
Roger S. Malahay

The K to 12 reform and the new Philippine Professional Standard for Teachers have changed the landscape of teacher quality requirements in the Philippines. It is in this context that this study is deemed necessary to determine the area of specialization and the teaching performance of the public secondary school Science teachers in terms of science content knowledge with this new educational schemeThere were 46 respondents in this study from the Department of Education-Guihulngan City Division, Negros Oriental Philippines. Findings reveal that the science teachers’ area of specialization can be categorized as Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSED) major in General Science, BS in Scientific Field (Nursing, Biology, and Chemical Engineering) and the Non-Science Field (English, TLE, Social Science). It indicates that majority of them lack the needed educational qualification to teach all science disciplines in the K12 curriculum. Furthermore, it shows that the BSED-General Science teachers with outstanding rating perform better than the B.S. in Scientific Field group and the non-science teachers with very good and good performance ratings respectively. It is an indication of lack of science content knowledge among the non-science teachers. Furthermore, the result discloses that the area of specialization is a determining factor in their teaching performance. It revealed that among the three groups of respondents, the general science teachers appear to be the most efficient.  They are followed by those in the B.S. in Scientific field, and the non-science teachers came out to be the lowest. Hence, it clearly suggests that the BSED-General Science teachers are the most qualified to teach science since they have the sufficient educational preparations. The B.S.in Scientific Field teachers need to undergo more training and enroll in graduate studies to master all the science areas in the K12 curriculum. While the non-science teachers are discouraged to handle science subjects since they lack the necessary educational preparation to teach science.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-37
Author(s):  
Mario Schmiedebach ◽  
Claas Wegner

Schools have begun to face many challenges with the influx of recently immigrated students who are not able to speak the official language well enough to participate in class. To help integrate and accelerate language acquisition in German schools, these students are often enrolled in "international classes". Our project, "Biology for Everyone", teaches newly arrived secondary students science through the use of hands-on experiments. While addressing scientific content, students build new language structures and improve their German. Using 13 interviews, the concomitant research examines students’ evaluations of the project in relation to science as well as language acquisition with a qualitative content analysis. Results show that students value this action-oriented approach as it helps them understand scientific concepts. Furthermore, they notice an improvement in their German and an increase in their science content knowledge. Therefore, such "international classes" should be considered for use in additional subjects in order to ease integration into the regular school system.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Dayle Anderson

<p>Lack of science content knowledge has often been suggested as underpinning primary teachers' reluctance to teach science or to provide limited learning opportunities when doing so. Understanding better the full range and nature of teacher knowledges that afford useful science learning opportunities in primary science education could produce a more positive view of primary teachers' potential for science teaching and usefully inform professional development in science. This research used a multiple case study approach to identify the nature of knowledges and beliefs that three teachers from schools well regarded for teaching science at Years 7 and 8 brought to their implementation of a unit of work in science. Students' perceptions of learning pertaining to the science unit were also examined. The influence of teacher knowledges on opportunities for science learning was considered and the ways in which the teachers developed science related teacher knowledges was investigated. Sociocultural theories of learning underpin this study and the extent to which the teachers incorporated sociocultural approaches in their science teaching was a particular focus. Frameworks guiding the analysis of the range of teacher knowledges and of sociocultural teaching approaches were developed from the literature. Data for each case study included observations and transcripts of recordings of the lessons forming each science unit together with multiple interviews with the teacher throughout its implementation. Interviews with focus students during and following the unit along with responses to a questionnaire completed by the class at the end of the unit provided insights into students’ perceptions of what they had learned. This study found that the teachers drew on a wide range of knowledges and beliefs to promote science learning. The teachers employing sociocultural approaches afforded most syntactic science learning opportunities. Crucially influential on the nature of science learning that was promoted was the teacher's orientation to science teaching, in particular, beliefs about the purposes and nature of science and science teaching. Four processes were identified that facilitated the teachers' development of science and pedagogical content knowledge: intentional development, reflection, repetition, and engaging and observing students in investigating the natural world. The nature of knowledge developed by each teacher was afforded and constrained by their orientation to science teaching and their recognition of and access to, sources of support. Learning science content, i.e., substantive science learning, was identified by students where this had been the focus of learning and assessment opportunities because of their teacher's particular orientation. Learning about the nature of science, i.e., syntactic science learning, was identified where this was the sole focus of learning and assessment opportunities. In the one case where the teacher's orientation afforded both types of learning opportunity with apparently equal emphasis, students more readily identified substantive science ideas over syntactic ideas as new or important learning.</p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (03) ◽  
pp. A04 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bethany Alender

Volunteer water quality monitors represent the intersection between citizen science and environmental stewardship. Understanding what motivates participation will enable project managers to improve recruitment and retention. This survey of 271 volunteers from eight water quality monitoring organizations in the U.S. found the strongest motivators to participate are helping the environment or community and contributing to scientific knowledge. No variation by gender was found, but younger volunteers have different motivations and preferences than older volunteers. Volunteers value the communication of tangible results more than recognition or reward.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document