scholarly journals Effect of Different Photoperiods on Quality Attributes and Oxidative Stability of Breast Meat (M. Pectoralis Major) from Broilers

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Will ◽  
J. R. Tuell ◽  
J. Park ◽  
W. Wang ◽  
H.-W. Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stability ◽  
Meat Quality ◽  
Color Stability ◽  
Quality Attributes ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Moisture Loss ◽  
Breast Meat ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Thiol Content ◽  
Water Holding

ObjectivesIn the broiler industry, high photoperiod (the duration of light exposure per day) regimes have traditionally been utilized to increase yield of breast meat, as well as maximize feed intake and growth rate in the growing period. However, recent literature reports this practice may have adverse effects on broiler welfare, resulting in impaired mobility and increased incidence of leg abnormalities. However, little information available in the current literature regarding effects of photoperiod on meat quality attributes and oxidative stability of broiler meat. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the quality characteristics and lipid/protein oxidative stability of breast meat from broilers that were exposed to different photoperiod combinations.Materials and MethodsA total of 432 Ross 308 broiler chicks were allocated among 4 rooms each subjected to one of the following photoperiod treatments (hours Light: Dark): 20L:4D, 18L:6D, 16L:8D and 12L:12D, with 6 pens per treatment. At d 42, 2 broilers per pen (12 broilers/treatment) were randomly selected, harvested and air chilled for 24 h at 2°C. At l day postmortem, paired breast muscles (M. pectoralis) were collected for the meat quality analyses such as, water-holding capacity (drip/purge/cook loss), Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), and display color for 7 d under fluorescent light (1450 lx). Lipid oxidation was assessed via the TBARS assay and protein oxidation by thiol content measured at d 1 and d 7 of display. The experimental design was randomized complete block design. Data were analyzed using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS, and means were separated using least significant differences (P < 0.05).ResultsPhotoperiod had no effect on fillet yield and pH (P > 0.05). No significant difference in WBSF was found between treatments, although 12L:12D had a trend of higher WBSF (P = 0.08). Higher moisture loss during carcass chilling was found in carcasses from 20L:4D compared to 16L:8D and 12L:12D treatments (P < 0.05). No other measure of water-holding capacity was affected, though the 16L:8D treatment demonstrated a trend of higher freezing/thawing loss compared to other treatments (P = 0.06). Proximate moisture, protein and lipid contents were unaffected by photoperiod (P > 0.05), but higher ash was observed in 16L:8D over 20L:4D and 18L:6D (P < 0.05). Different photoperiod combinations affected color stability of breast meat during display (P < 0.05). Of note, fillets from 20L:4D maintained highest L* and hue angle, and least a* values (P < 0.05), indicating inferior color stability compared to other treatments. Oxidation increased with display, and fillets from 20L:4D and 18L:6D had higher TBARS over 12L:12D (P < 0.05); no photoperiod effect was observed in thiol content (P > 0.05).ConclusionResults suggest 20L:4D photoperiod regimes may be detrimental to meat quality, as carcasses from this treatment group had higher moisture loss during chilling, and color measurements characterized these fillets as being paler and more discolored than other treatments. Fillets from 12L:12D maintained lower TBARS than 20L:4D and 18L:6D, suggesting photoperiod regimes allowing more hours of dark may be beneficial in improving oxidative stability. Further studies determining the effects of photoperiod on quality and protein functionality of chicken meat for processing technological would be highly warranted.

scholarly journals Influence of electrical stimulation on carcass and meat quality of Kosher and conventionally slaughtered cattle

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 58-63
Author(s):  
B Agbeniga ◽  
EC Webb
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Meat Quality ◽  
Shear Force ◽  
Quality Attributes ◽  
Cooking Loss ◽  
Temperature Profiles ◽  
Group 12 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Water Holding

In a previous study regarding the effects of Kosher and conventional slaughter techniques on carcass and meat quality of cattle, it was speculated that electrical stimulation may have affected some of the meat qualities. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of electrical stimulation (ES) and non-electrical stimulation (NES) on key carcass and meat quality attributes of cattle slaughtered by Kosher vs. conventional slaughter methods. Carcass pH and temperature profiles over a 24 h post mortem (pm) period, meat shear force and water holding capacity were investigated in feedlot type cattle of comparable weights and breed types. Results showed that the combined effects of slaughter methods did not influence the meat quality attributes, but there were differences within the slaughter groups. The effect of ES on carcass pH lasted longer within the conventionally slaughtered group (12 h), than in the Kosher slaughter group (6 h). Muscle samples from the ES groups for both slaughter methods were more tender. Electrical stimulation also had a significant effect on the cooking loss from Kosher meat, while there was no significant difference in meat from the conventional slaughter methods. The results show that ES influences certain meat and carcass quality attributes of cattle, based on the way cattle were slaughtered.Keywords: Carcass pH, cooking loss, drip loss, electrical stimulation, shear force, slaughter technique

scholarly journals Pengaruh zonasi dalam kandang closed house terhadap kadar amonia dan dampaknya pada kualitas daging broiler di musim penghujan

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 183
Author(s):  
Renata Renata ◽  
Teysar Adi Sarjana ◽  
Sri Kismiati
Keyword(s):  
Protein Content ◽  
Animal Husbandry ◽  
Fat Content ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Breast Meat ◽  
Meat Protein ◽  
Protein Mass ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Inlet Position ◽  
Water Holding

<p>This experiment was conducted to determine the effect of zonation in closed house on ammonia levels and its impact on broiler chicken quality in the rainy season. The research was held in closed house, Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Agriculture, Diponegoro University. Three hundred and sixty broilers were divided into 24 groups (4 treatment, 6 placement groups of broiler): T1 (Zone 1, at the inlet position of the cage), T2 (Zone 2; ¼ of the length of the cage), T3 (Zone 3; ½ from the length of the cage ); T4 (Zone 4; ¾ of the length of the cage). During the study of ammonia levels, the temperature, humidity, and wind velocity inside and outside the cage were taken to obtain an overview of several factors that contribute to ammonia levels. The parameters observed were water holding capacity, pH, color, moisture content, fat content, and protein content. Water holding capacity and the color of the upper thigh meat increased significantly in the zone near the outlet (p &lt;0.05), but the water holding capacity and the color of the lower thighs and breast meat did not increase (p&gt; 0.05) in the zone near the outlet, but it has a darker meat color on the zone near the outlet. The pH did not show any significant difference (p&gt; 0.05) in the zone near the outlet. Water content followed by fat content of breast meat showed no significant difference (p&gt; 0.05) due to zoning. Breast protein content significantly increased (p &lt;0.05) in the zone near the outlet. It was concluded that placement in the zone near outlet had impact on the increase of water holding capacity, color, and protein content. Nevertheless, an increase in meat protein in the zone near the outlet is not followed by increased meat protein mass.</p>

scholarly journals Transcriptome profiling analysis of muscle tissue reveals potential candidate genes affecting water holding capacity in Chinese Simmental beef cattle

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili Du ◽  
Tianpeng Chang ◽  
Bingxing An ◽  
Mang Liang ◽  
Xinghai Duan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Candidate Genes ◽  
Molecular Mechanism ◽  
Meat Quality ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Transcriptome Profiling ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Potential Candidate ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Water Holding

AbstractWater holding capacity (WHC) is an important sensory attribute that greatly influences meat quality. However, the molecular mechanism that regulates the beef WHC remains to be elucidated. In this study, the longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles of 49 Chinese Simmental beef cattle were measured for meat quality traits and subjected to RNA sequencing. WHC had significant correlation with 35 kg water loss (r = − 0.99, p < 0.01) and IMF content (r = 0.31, p < 0.05), but not with SF (r = − 0.20, p = 0.18) and pH (r = 0.11, p = 0.44). Eight individuals with the highest WHC (H-WHC) and the lowest WHC (L-WHC) were selected for transcriptome analysis. A total of 865 genes were identified as differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between two groups, of which 633 genes were up-regulated and 232 genes were down-regulated. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment revealed that DEGs were significantly enriched in 15 GO terms and 96 pathways. Additionally, based on protein–protein interaction (PPI) network, animal QTL database (QTLdb), and relevant literature, the study not only confirmed seven genes (HSPA12A, HSPA13, PPARγ, MYL2, MYPN, TPI, and ATP2A1) influenced WHC in accordance with previous studies, but also identified ATP2B4, ACTN1, ITGAV, TGFBR1, THBS1, and TEK as the most promising novel candidate genes affecting the WHC. These findings could offer important insight for exploring the molecular mechanism underlying the WHC trait and facilitate the improvement of beef quality.

scholarly journals Effects of Photoperiod Regime on Meat Quality, Oxidative Stability, and Metabolites of Postmortem Broiler Fillet (M. Pectoralis major) Muscles

Foods ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob R. Tuell ◽  
Jun-Young Park ◽  
Weichao Wang ◽  
Bruce Cooper ◽  
Tiago Sobreira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stability ◽  
Meat Quality ◽  
Shear Force ◽  
Protein Denaturation ◽  
Aromatic Amino Acids ◽  
Pectoralis Major ◽  
Photoperiod Regime ◽  
Weight Yield ◽  
Considerable Impact ◽  
Water Holding

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of photoperiod on meat quality, oxidative stability, and metabolites of broiler fillet (M. Pectoralis major) muscles. A total of 432 broilers was split among 4 photoperiod treatments [hours light(L):dark(D)]: 20L:4D, 18L:6D, 16L:8D, and 12L:12D. At 42 days, a total of 48 broilers (12 broilers/treatment) was randomly selected and harvested. At 1 day postmortem, fillet muscles were dissected and displayed for 7 days. No considerable impacts of photoperiods on general carcass and meat quality attributes, such as carcass weight, yield, pH, water-holding capacity, and shear force, were found (p > 0.05). However, color and oxidative stability were influenced by the photoperiod, where muscles from 20L:4D appeared lighter and more discolored, coupled with higher lipid oxidation (p < 0.05) and protein denaturation (p = 0.058) compared to 12L:12D. The UPLC–MS metabolomics identified that 20 metabolites were different between the 20L:4D and 12L:12D groups, and 15 were tentatively identified. In general, lower aromatic amino acids/dipeptides, and higher oxidized glutathione and guanine/methylated guanosine were observed in 20L:4D. These results suggest that a photoperiod would result in no considerable impact on initial meat quality, but extended photoperiods might negatively impact oxidative stability through an alteration of the muscle metabolites.

Meat quality of Boer goat kids and Mutton Merino lambs 2. Sensory meat evaluation

2003 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Sheridan ◽  
L.C. Hoffman ◽  
A.V. Ferreira
Keyword(s):  
Energy Level ◽  
Shear Force ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Metabolizable Energy ◽  
Drip Loss ◽  
Goat Meat ◽  
Boer Goat ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Slaughter Age ◽  
Water Holding

AbstractThe meat palatability, water-holding capacity, colour and shear force values of 32 Boer goat (BG) kids and 32 South African Mutton Merino (MM) lambs were investigated. Two pelleted diets (offered to 16 animals per species) with either a low (LE, 9·9 MJ/kg dry matter (DM)) or a high (HE, 12·1 MJ/kg DM) metabolizable energy level were given to the animals for either 28 or 56 days. Thereafter the animals were slaughtered, the meat cooked and presented to a trained sensory panel. Organoleptically, a difference between goat and lamb was noted. Each one had a specific species flavour, which was not influenced by energy level of the diet. BG meat was perceived to be stringier than that of the MM, but there was no significant difference in Warner-Bratzler shear force values. Tenderness declined with age in both species and there was also a tendency for goat meat to be less juicy than lamb. Chevon had a more pronounced after-taste than lamb. No objective difference could be distinguished between the colour of the cooked goat and lamb, but there was a tendency for fresh lamb to have a higher a*-value (redness) than goat. Although diet did not influence drip loss, drip loss increased with an increase in slaughter age. Only after 56 days did the m. semimembranosus of MM have a significantly higher drip loss than that of BG (LE: 4·84 v. 3·43%; HE: 4·72 v. 3·23%). In the m. semimembranosus of both species cooking loss increased with an increase in slaughter age. It can be concluded that goat meat compares favourably with lamb in terms of water-holding capacity, colour and shear force values. If goats are finished in the feedlot, it can be done on a LE diet, since diet does not influences any of the mentioned characteristics. This may render a direct economic advantage for BG feedlot finishing.

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Functional Properties of Some Commonly Used Cereal and Legume Flours and Their Blends

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Haq Nawaz ◽  
Muhammad Aslam Shad ◽  
Rabia Mehmood ◽  
Tanzila Rehman ◽  
Hira Munir
Keyword(s):  
Bulk Density ◽  
Functional Properties ◽  
Protein Solubility ◽  
High Water ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Functional Score ◽  
Chickpea Flour ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Swelling Capacity ◽  
Water Holding

<p>Functional properties such as protein solubility, swelling capacity, water holding capacity, gelling ability, bulk density and foaming capacity of flours of some commonly used cereals and legume (wheat, refined wheat, maize and chickpea) and their blends were studied. Blends of flours were prepared by mixing equal proportions of selected floors. Statistically significant difference  in studied functional properties except bulk density was observed among cereal flours and their blends. Chickpea flour was found to possess comparatively high water holding capacity, protein solubility index and swelling capacity. The functional properties of maize and wheat flours were found to be improved when blended with chickpea. Chickpea flour and its blends with cereal flours were found to possess good functional score and suggested as favorable candidates for use in the preparation of viscous foods and bakery products. The data provide guidelines regarding the improvement in functional properties of economically favorable cereal flours.<strong></strong></p>

scholarly journals Effect of Frozen Storage on the Water- Holding Capacity and pH of Broiler Chicken cut-up Parts (Gallus gallus domesticus)

2020 ◽  
pp. 8-15
Author(s):  
Arjun Ghimire ◽  
Pawan Parajuli
Keyword(s):  
Broiler Chicken ◽  
Frozen Storage ◽  
Gallus Gallus ◽  
Gallus Domesticus ◽  
Cooking Loss ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Drip Loss ◽  
Gallus Gallus Domesticus ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Water Holding

Broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) were collected from local chicken suppliers of Dharan (26.8065° N, 87.2846° E), Nepal, and slaughtered to prepare the cut-up parts (breast, drumstick, dorso, wings, and thigh). They were vacuum packed in polythene bags and frozen stored (-21.5 ±3.5ºC) for 45 days to study the effect of frozen storage on the water holding capacity (WHC) of meat. Cooking loss, drip loss, and pH changes were analyzed at 5 days intervals during storage and the data were analyzed using Genstat® v 12.1.The cut-up parts showed a significant change (p<0.05) in pH, cooking loss, and drip loss during 45 days of frozen storage. The pH decreased while the drip loss and the cooking loss increased gradually upon storage. The pH was found to be varied among the cut-up parts with a minimum pH scale of 5.25 for wings, followed by 5.3 for thigh, at the end. The highest drip loss of 6.11% was observed in wings after 5 days of storage which ended up to 8.97% after 45 days of frozen storage while drumstick and thigh samples showed significantly lower drip loss of 6.02%, and 5.43% respectively. The change in cooking loss showed a similar pattern as that of drip loss with a significantly higher value of 37.36% in the breast while it showed no significant difference in drumstick, dorso, and thigh meat. Thus, the study reveals that freezing of broiler chicken meats for a prolonged period adversely affects the WHC of meat

scholarly journals Determination of Chemical Content and some Physical Properties and Meat Pigments (Myoglobin, Meta Myoglobin and Oxymyoglobin) in Different Parts of Slaughtered Animals

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 302-319
Author(s):  
Khadeeja S.J. Al-Husseiny ◽  
Maryam T. Khrebish
Keyword(s):  
The Body ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Fresh Meat ◽  
Ph Values ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chemical Content ◽  
Meat Samples ◽  
Water Holding ◽  
Different Parts

The current study aimed to estimate the pigments of some muscles parts taken from cows, sheep and chicken (thigh, chest and back). The chemical content including moisture, protein, lipids and ash, as well as the pH and the water holding capacity have been evaluated. Results showed that the moisture differed among three animals with high percentage of moisture, ash and lipid in back in compared with other parts of cows. while significant difference in the percentage of ash of back with other parts and in protein in chest with other parts of sheep. The significant differences were recorded in percentage of ash of three parts of chicken, also significant differences between chest and back. The water holding capacity of fresh meat samples taken from thigh, chest and back of cows, sheep and chicken significantly differ among samples. pH values which reflect a confect in water holding capacity of meat samples taken from different parts of the body and from different animal. In addition, there was a significant differences in the percentage of the presences of myoglobin, metmyoglobin and oxymyoglobin in different samples taken from different parts of the slaughtered animals.

scholarly journals Imaging Analysis by Digital Camera for Separating Broiler Breast Meat with Low Water-Holding Capacity

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pensiri Kaewthong ◽  
Kriangkrai Waiyagan ◽  
Saowakon Wattanachant
Keyword(s):  
Digital Camera ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Imaging Analysis ◽  
Breast Meat ◽  
Broiler Breast ◽  
Water Holding

Pig Meat Quality as Affected by Genetics and Production Systems

1995 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ellis ◽  
F.K. Mckeith
Keyword(s):  
Meat Quality ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Eating Quality ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Pig Production ◽  
Pig Meat ◽  
On Farm ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Water Holding

The efficiency of pig production has increased considerably in recent years, but the improvement of meat quality has only recently begun to receive attention. Closer links between the producers and marketers of pigs are now resulting in a clearer understanding of the factors that lead to meat of high quality. Here, some of the major on-farm influences on meat quality are described, focussing on meat colour, water-holding capacity and eating quality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document