Role of filter design in embolic protection during carotid artery stenting

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumaira Macdonald
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Filter Design ◽  
Embolic Protection

The role of virtual reality in the training for carotid artery stenting: the perspective of trainees

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Mazzaccaro ◽  
Rim Miri ◽  
Bilel Derbel ◽  
Paolo Righini ◽  
Giovanni Nano
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Cerebral Embolization After Carotid Artery Stenting With Embolic Protection

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaudija Bijuklic ◽  
Andreas Wandler ◽  
Yuriy Varnakov ◽  
Thilo Tuebler ◽  
Joachim Schofer
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Embolic Protection ◽  
Cerebral Embolization

scholarly journals PS56. Impact of Distal Protection Filter Design in Thirty-Day Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting

2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 42S-43S
Author(s):  
Natasha Loghmanpour ◽  
Gail Siewiorek ◽  
Kelly Wanamaker ◽  
Mark Wholey ◽  
Rabih Chaer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Filter Design ◽  
Distal Protection ◽  
Protection Filter

Abstract P540: Safety of Carotid Artery Stenting Without Embolic Protection: A Single Centre Experience

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Hawkes ◽  
Aviraj Deshmukh ◽  
Brian van Adel
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Atheromatous Plaque ◽  
Stroke Rate ◽  
Protection Device ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Stent Occlusion ◽  
Embolic Protection Device ◽  
Embolic Protection

Introduction: One of the most feared complications of carotid revascularization, including carotid artery stenting (CAS), is peri-procedural ischemic stroke. Several studies suggest that the use of a distal embolic protection device (EPD), as well as over-sized pre- and post-stenting balloon angioplasty, may increase the risk of dislodgement of atheromatous plaque in patients undergoing CAS. The CREST trial, that mandated the use of an EPD, had a peri-procedural ischemic stroke rate of 4.1%. We hypothesize that our technique of stenting without the use of an EPD and sub-maximal angioplasty will have a low risk of peri-procedural complications. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive cases of ICA stenting without use of an embolic protection device between January 2012 and June 2020 at a Canadian stroke centre. Data was extracted from the patient electronic medical record and Picture Archives and Communications Systems (PACS). Both symptomatic and asymptomatic CAS cases were included. Results: A total of 220 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 70 years (range 39-93 years), and 83 patients (38%) were female. The vast majority of patients were symptomatic (216 patients [98%]). A large portion of patients had a contralateral ICA occlusion or near occlusion (56 patients [25%]). In the majority of cases, a Precise Cordis RX carotid stent (Cordis) was placed. There were four patients with peri-procedural ischemic strokes (1.8%), with two occurring 8-30 days after stenting. There was one case of acute stent occlusion associated with an ischemic stroke. Two patients (less than 1%) had hyperperfusion syndrome after CAS. Median length of stay following the procedure was one day. Conclusions: In this single centre series, the peri-procedural risks of CAS without using an EPD are low. The ischemic stroke rate is less than 2%, lower than what has been reported in large randomized controlled trials using embolic protection.

scholarly journals CRT-300.04 Comparison of Devices in Carotid Artery Stenting: A Vascular Quality Initiative Analysis of Commonly Used Carotid Stents and Embolic Protection Devices

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. S41
Author(s):  
Ashwat S. Dhillon ◽  
Sisi Li ◽  
Juan Pablo Lewinger ◽  
Leonardo C. Clavijo ◽  
David M. Shavelle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Embolic Protection ◽  
Protection Devices

scholarly journals Carotid artery stenting: current role of proximal neuroprotection and technical advancements in stroke prevention

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (suppl A) ◽  
pp. A29-A33 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cremonesi ◽  
M. Mussardo ◽  
P. Sbarzaglia ◽  
B. Spagnolo ◽  
C. Cavazza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Current Role

scholarly journals Postoperative ischemic events in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting using algorithmic selection for embolic protection

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 294-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Kawabata ◽  
Norio Nakajima ◽  
Hidenori Miyake ◽  
Shunichi Fukuda ◽  
Tetsuya Tsukahara
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Embolic Protection ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Purpose Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a valuable alternative to carotid endarterectomy, especially in high-risk patients. However, the reported incidences of perioperative stroke and death remain higher than for carotid endarterectomy, even when using embolic protection devices (EPDs) during CAS. Our purpose was to evaluate 30-day major adverse events after CAS when selecting the most appropriate EPD. Methods We reviewed the clinical outcomes of 61 patients with 64 lesions who underwent CAS with EPDs. Patients who underwent CAS associated with thrombectomy and who had a preoperative modified Rankin scale score >3 were excluded from the analysis. The EPD was selected based on symptoms, carotid wall magnetic resonance imaging and lesion length, and we analyzed combined 30-day complication rates (transient ischemic attack, minor stroke, major stroke or death). Results Forty-nine patients were men and 12 were women. The median age was 72 years (range: 59–89 years) and 44 lesions were asymptomatic. A filter-type EPD was selected in 23 procedures, distal-balloon protection in 14 procedures and proximal-occlusive protection in 27 procedures. Two patients (3.1%) experienced a transient ischemic attack and one patient (1.6%) had a minor stroke within 30 days of the procedure. No patients experienced procedure-related morbidities (modified Rankin score >2) or death. Conclusions The perioperative stoke rate was low when we selected a proximal-occlusive-type EPD in high-risk patients with vulnerable carotid artery disease. Our algorithm for EPD selection was an effective tool in the perioperative management of carotid artery stenosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document