scholarly journals Efektifitas Berbagai Metode Pembelajaran untuk Partisipasi Aktif Mahasiswa dan Stimulasi Proses Clinical Reasoning

Author(s):  
Widyandana Widyandana

Background: Skills lab program can be conducted by several methods, such as training by mannequin, role play with peers, simulated patients, and training in community. Medical students are expected to play an active role in training and always practice their clinical reasoning skills. However, there are still many students not ready for implementing some medical procedure in their clerkship. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the level of active participation and the clinical reasoning process of students obtained in four learning methods in skills lab.Method: This study used a cross-sectional design with random survey questioner to 150 medical students in Medical Faculty of GMU (n=150). This survey were expected to explore the impression of students to each learning method, particularly in the active participation in practice and the clinical reasoning process. The results were analyzed using descriptive quantitative method by comparing total score of each learning method.Results: The results showed that the learning method of medical skills in community is superior to 3 other methods, namely practice with mannequins, role play with peers, as well as simulated patients, both in promoting the active participation of students and stimulating the clinical reasoning skills (p<0.05).Conclusion: Medical skills training in community is more effective in promoting the active participation of students in practice and stimulating the clinical reasoning skills. However, it should considerate with compatibility of topic, students’ readiness, and combined methods if needed.

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. e89-e95
Author(s):  
Jean-Francois Lemay ◽  
Tyrone Donnon ◽  
Bernard Charlin

Background: The Script Concordance (SC) approach was used as an alternative test format to measure the presence of knowledge organization reflective in one’s clinical reasoning skills (i.e., diagnostic, investigation and treatment knowledge).Methods:  The present study investigated the reliability and validity of a 40-item paediatric version of the SC test with three groups representing 53 medical students (novices), 42 paediatric residents (intermediates) and 11 paediatricians (experts).Results:  A comparison between scoring techniques based on experts’ ratings of the items showed internal reliability coefficients from .74 for the one-best answer up to .78 for alternative scoring techniques.  An ANOVA showed an increase in test performance from medical students through to expert paediatricians (F(2,103) = 84.05, p < .001), but did not differentiate between the postgraduate year 1 to 3 paediatric residents.  A large effect size (Cohen’s d) difference of 1.06 was found between medical students and residents total SC test scores.Conclusions:  These results support other findings indicating the SC test format can be used to differentiate between the clinical reasoning skills of novices, intermediates and experts in paediatrics.  An alternative scoring method that includes one best answer and partial marks was also supported for grading SC test items.


MedEdPORTAL ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy Strowd ◽  
Anthony Kwan ◽  
Tiana Cruz ◽  
Charlene Gamaldo ◽  
Rachel Salas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document