scholarly journals ABSTRACT REAL NUMBERS

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Soeparna Darmawijaya

In this paper we represent a result of our study in field of analysis , that is, an abstraction of the system of real numbers. We start by defining a set of positive elements in a countable infinite (denumerable) field and, hence, we obtain a linearly ordered field which we call a field of rational elements or a rational field. After that we may introduce irrationals elements in our rational field. And, at last we have a system of real abstract numbers.

1978 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Singer

In this paper, we show that the theory of ordered differential fields has a model completion. We also show that any real differential field, finitely generated over the rational numbers, is isomorphic to some field of real meromorphic functions. In the last section of this paper, we combine these two results and discuss the problem of deciding if a system of differential equations has real analytic solutions. The author wishes to thank G. Stengle for some stimulating and helpful conversations and for drawing our attention to fields of real meromorphic functions.§ 1. Real and ordered fields. A real field is a field in which −1 is not a sum of squares. An ordered field is a field F together with a binary relation < which totally orders F and satisfies the two properties: (1) If 0 < x and 0 < y then 0 < xy. (2) If x < y then, for all z in F, x + z < y + z. An element x of an ordered field is positive if x > 0. One can see that the square of any element is positive and that the sum of positive elements is positive. Since −1 is not positive, an ordered field is a real field. Conversely, given a real field F, it is known that one can define an ordering (not necessarily uniquely) on F [2, p. 274]. An ordered field F is a real closed field if: (1) every positive element is a square, and (2) every polynomial of odd degree with coefficients in F has a root in F. For example, the real numbers form a real closed field. Every ordered field can be embedded in a real closed field. It is also known that, in a real closed field K, polynomials satisfy the intermediate value property, i.e. if f(x) ∈ K[x] and a, b ∈ K, a < b, and f(a)f(b) < 0 then there is a c in K such that f(c) = 0.


1963 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-255
Author(s):  
Stanton M. Trott

The model of the real numbers described below was suggested by the fact that each irrational number ρ determines a linear ordering of J2, the additive group of ordered pairs of integers. To obtain the ordering, we define (m, n) ≤ (m', n') to mean that (m'- m)ρ ≤ n' - n. This order is invariant with group translations, and hence is called a "group linear ordering". It is completely determined by the set of its "positive" elements, in this case, by the set of integer pairs (m, n) such that (0, 0) ≤ (m, n), or, equivalently, mρ < n. The law of trichotomy for linear orderings dictates that only the zero of an ordered group can be both positive and negative.


1985 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 380-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Rapp
Keyword(s):  

AbstractLet ℜ = (R, + R,…) be the ordered field of real numbers. It will be shown that the -theory of ℜ is decidable, where denotes the Malitz quantifier of order n in the ℵ1-interpretation.


1987 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel E. Cohen ◽  
Roger D. Nussbaum

AbstractWe prove the existence of unique limits and establish inequalities for matrix generalizations of the arithmetic–geometric mean of Lagrange and Gauss. For example, for a matrix A = (aij) with positive elements aij, define (contrary to custom) A½ elementwise by [A½]ij = (aij)½. Let A(0) and B(0) be d × d matrices (1 < d < ∞) with all elements positive real numbers. Let A(n + 1) = (A(n) + B(n))/2 and B(n + 1 ) = (d−1A(n)B(n))½. Then all elements of A(n) and B(n) approach a common positive limit L. When A(0) and B(0) are both row-stochastic or both column-stochastic, dL is less than or equal to the arithmetic average of the spectral radii of A(0) and B(0).


1969 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 149-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. M. Viswanathan

Hölder's theorem on archimedean groups states:An ordered (abelian) group G is order isomorphic to an ordered subgroup of the ordered group R of real numbers if and only if it is archimedean.We comprehend this theorem in the following setting: G is a Z-module and Ris the completion with respect to the open interval topology of the ordered field Q; Qitself is the ordered quotient field of the ordered domain Z.Rephrasing the situation, we raise the following question: We start with a fully ordered domain A,let Kbe its ordered quotient field. We endow Kwith the open interval topology and consider , the topological completion of K. Is it possible to impose a compatible order structure on and if this can be done, when can we say that an ordered A-module Mis order isomorphic to an ordered A-submodule of ? In Theorem 3.1, we obtain a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for this isomorphism to hold.


1950 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 241-247
Author(s):  
Hao Wang

In [1] we have considered a certain system L and shown that although its axioms are considerably weaker than those of [2], it suffices for purposes of the topics covered in [2]. The purpose of the present paper is to consider the system L more carefully and to show that with suitably chosen definitions for numbers, the ordinary theory of real numbers is also obtainable in it. For this purpose, we shall indicate that we can prove in L a certain set of twenty axioms used by Tarski which are sufficient for the arithmetic of real numbers and are to the effect that real numbers form a complete ordered field. Indeed, we cannot prove in L all Tarski's twenty axioms in their full generality. One of them, stating in effect that every bounded class of real numbers possesses a least upper bound, can only be proved as a metatheorem which states that every bounded nameable class of real numbers possesses a least upper bound. However, all the other nineteen axioms can be proved in L without any modification.This result may be of some interest because the axioms of L are considerably weaker than those commonly employed for the same purpose. In L variables need to take as values only classes each of whose members has no more than two members. In other words, only classes each with no more than two members are to be elements. On the other hand, it is usual to assume for the purpose of natural arithmetic that all finite classes are elements, and, for the purpose of real arithmetic, that all enumerable classes are elements.


2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
GREGORY IGUSA ◽  
JULIA F. KNIGHT ◽  
NOAH DAVID SCHWEBER

AbstractIn [8], the third author defined a reducibility $\le _w^{\rm{*}}$ that lets us compare the computing power of structures of any cardinality. In [6], the first two authors showed that the ordered field of reals ${\cal R}$ lies strictly above certain related structures. In the present paper, we show that $\left( {{\cal R},exp} \right) \equiv _w^{\rm{*}}{\cal R}$. More generally, for the weak-looking structure ${\cal R}$ℚ consisting of the real numbers with just the ordering and constants naming the rationals, all o-minimal expansions of ${\cal R}$ℚ are equivalent to ${\cal R}$. Using this, we show that for any analytic function f, $\left( {{\cal R},f} \right) \equiv _w^{\rm{*}}{\cal R}$. (This is so even if $\left( {{\cal R},f} \right)$ is not o-minimal.)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document