scholarly journals Qualitative and Quantitative Phase-Analysis of Undoped Titanium Dioxide and Chromium Doped Titanium Dioxide from Powder X-Ray Diffraction Data

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hari Sutrisno ◽  
Ariswan Ariswan ◽  
Dyah Purwaningsih

Undoped titanium dioxide (TiO2) and a series of chromium(III) doped TiO2 (Cr-doped TiOfig. 12) with various %wt Cr atom were prepared by a reflux technique. The undoped TiO2 and Cr-doped TiO2 of 1.1, 3.9, 4.4 %wt Cr atom have been successfully analyzed both qualitative and quantitative analysis of powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) data. The qualitative analysis was carried out with the identification of phases in all samples by comparison with Crystallography Open Database (COD) and International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD), while the quantitative phase analysis was calculated by reference intensity ratio (RIR) and whole-pattern fitting (Rietveld analysis) methods. The undoped TiO2 consist of three phases: anatase, rutile, and brookite. In the 1.1 %wt Cr-doped TiO2 are detected presenting two phases: anatase (major) and rutile (minor). In the 3.9 %wt Cr-doped TiO2 andin the 4.4 %wt Cr-doped TiO2 consist of anatase as major phase, while CrO2 and TiO2-II phases can be detected as minor phases. The undoped TiO2 was refined in the phase, crystal system and space group of anatase (tetragonal, I41/amd), rutile (tetragonal, P42/mnm) and brookite (orthorhombic, Pbca), while the 1.1 %wt Cr-doped TiO2 was refined based on anatase (tetragonal, I41/amd), rutile (tetragonal, P42/mnm). Finally, in the 3.9 %wt Cr-doped TiO2 and 4.4 %wt Cr-doped TiO2,respectively were refined in the crystal system and space group of anatase (tetragonal, I41/amd).

1982 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 119-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald C. Gehringer ◽  
Gregory J. McCarthy ◽  
R.G. Garvey ◽  
Deane K. Smith

Solid solutions are pervasive in minerals and in industrial inorganic materials. The analyst is often called upon to provide qualitative and quantitative X-ray phase analysis for specimens containing solid solutions when all that is available are Powder Diffraction File (PDF) data or commercial standards for the end members. In an earlier paper (1) we presented several examples of substantial errors in accuracy of quantitative analysis that can arise when the crystallinity and composition of the analyte standard do not match those of the analyte in the sample of interest. We recommended that to obtain more accurate quantitative analyses, one should determine the analyte composition (e.g., from XRF on grains seen in a SEM or from comparison of cell parameters with those of the end members) and synthesize an analyte standard with this composition and with a crystallinity approximating that of the analyte (e.g., as determined from peak breadth or α1/ α2 splitting).


1966 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 1741-1745 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. F. Karlak ◽  
D. S. Burnett

1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee-Lack Choi ◽  
Nobuo Ishizawa ◽  
Naoya Enomoto ◽  
Zenbe-e Nakagawa

X-ray powder-diffraction data for Pb2(C2O4)(NO3)2·2H2O were obtained. The crystal system was determined to be monoclinic. The unit-cell parameters were refined to a=10.613(2) Å, b=7.947(2) Å, c=6.189(1) Å, and β=104.48(2)°.


1957 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 39-58
Author(s):  
Ralph H. Hiltz ◽  
Stanley L. Lopata

AbstractIn view of present difficulties encountered in met alio graphic methods of phase analysis of titanium and its alloys, the possibility of utilizing integrated X-ray intensities for phase analysis was investigated. Power Formula variables were calculated for titanium, and relative areas of three alpha and one beta peak were determined. Recorded X-ray intensities were obtained from a large number of titanium specimens. The recorded intensities were analyzed and the results compared with those from metallographic analysis. The errors in the method arising from the nature of titanium, texture and peak overlapping, were studied and where possible, compensated for by adjusting the method of measurement and calculation.


2007 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 1145-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
LaReine A. Yeoh ◽  
Klaus-Dieter Liss ◽  
Arno Bartels ◽  
Harald Chladil ◽  
Maxim Avdeev ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee-Lack Choi ◽  
Naoya Enomoto ◽  
Nobuo Ishizawa ◽  
Zenbe-e Nakagawa

X-ray powder diffraction data for Ti2O2(C2O4)(OH)2·H2O were obtained. The crystal system was determined to be orthorhombic with space group C2221. The unit cell parameters were refined to a = 1.0503(2) nm, b = 1.5509(3) nm, and c = 0.9700(1) nm.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document