scholarly journals Family-Centered Care in Juvenile Justice Institutions: A Mixed Methods Study Protocol

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. e177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inge Simons ◽  
Eva Mulder ◽  
Henk Rigter ◽  
René Breuk ◽  
Wander van der Vaart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Family Centered Care ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Family Centered

scholarly journals Determinants of parental participation in Family-centered Care in Juvenile Justice Institutions

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inge Simons ◽  
Eva Mulder ◽  
René Breuk ◽  
Henk Rigter ◽  
Lieke van Domburgh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Parental Participation ◽  
Family Centered Care ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Family Centered

scholarly journals Parents’ Perspectives on Family-centered Care in Juvenile Justice Institutions

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 39-54
Author(s):  
Inge Simons ◽  
Wander van der Vaart ◽  
Eva Mulder ◽  
Henk Rigter ◽  
René Breuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Family Centered Care ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Family Centered

scholarly journals Content and Communication of Inpatient Family Visitation Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Sequential Mixed Methods Study (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Hart ◽  
Amy Summer ◽  
Kuldeep N Yadav ◽  
Summer Peace ◽  
David Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The United States ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Factorial Survey ◽  
Family Centered Care ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Community Protection ◽  
Willingness To Recommend ◽  
Family Centered ◽  
Scientific Rationale ◽  
Care Support

BACKGROUND Inpatient health care facilities restricted inpatient visitation due to the COVID-19 pandemic. There is no existing evidence of how they communicated these policies to the public nor the impact of their communication choices on public perception. OBJECTIVE This study aims to describe patterns of inpatient visitation policies during the initial peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States and the communication of these policies to the general public, as well as to identify communication strategies that maximize positive impressions of the facility despite visitation restrictions. METHODS We conducted a sequential, exploratory, mixed methods study including a qualitative analysis of COVID-19 era visitation policies published on Pennsylvania-based facility websites, as captured between April 30 and May 20, 2020 (ie, during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States). We also conducted a factorial survey-based experiment to test how key elements of hospitals’ visitation policy communication are associated with individuals’ willingness to seek care in October 2020. For analysis of the policies, we included all inpatient facilities in Pennsylvania. For the factorial experiment, US adults were drawn from internet research panels. The factorial survey-based experiment presented composite policies that varied in their justification for restricted visitation, the degree to which the facility expressed ownership of the policy, and the inclusion of family-centered care support plans. Our primary outcome was participants’ willingness to recommend the hypothetical facility using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS We identified 104 unique policies on inpatient visitation from 363 facilities’ websites. The mean Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level for the policies was 14.2. Most policies prohibited family presence (99/104, 95.2%). Facilities justified the restricted visitation policies on the basis of community protection (59/104, 56.7%), authorities’ guidance or regulations (34/104, 32.7%), or scientific rationale (23/104, 22.1%). A minority (38/104, 36.5%) addressed how restrictive visitation may impair family-centered care. Most of the policies analyzed used passive voice to communicate restrictions. A total of 1321 participants completed the web-based survey. Visitation policy elements significantly associated with willingness to recommend the facility included justifications based on community protection (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.24-1.68) or scientific rationale (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.12-1.51), rather than those based on a governing authority. The facility expressed a high degree of ownership over the decision (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04-1.29), rather than a low degree of ownership; and inclusion of family-centered care support plans (OR 2.80, 95% CI 2.51-3.12), rather than no such support. CONCLUSIONS Health systems can immediately improve public receptiveness of restrictive visitation policies by emphasizing community protection, ownership over the facility’s policy, and promoting family-centered care.

scholarly journals Teletherapy for children with developmental disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines: a mixed-methods evaluation from the perspectives of parents and therapists

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathlynne F. Eguia ◽  
Catherine M. Capio
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Developmental Disorders ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Delivery Mode ◽  
Family Centered Care ◽  
Enabling Factors ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Therapy Services ◽  
Family Centered

Objectives: As a response to the lockdown associated with COVID-19 in the Philippines, therapy services for children with developmental disorders shifted to telehealth (i.e., teletherapy). This study evaluated the delivery of teletherapy from the perspectives of parents and therapists. Methods: Participants consisted of parents (n = 47) and therapists (n = 102) of children with developmental disorders who were receiving teletherapy during the lockdown. A mixed-methods triangulation design-convergence model was adopted; participants were invited to respond to an online survey with closed- and open-ended questions. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and non-parametric inferential tests, while qualitative data were examined using thematic analysis. Results: Overall satisfaction with teletherapy was positive, with parents reporting significantly higher satisfaction compared to therapists. Satisfaction was positively associated with the frequency of teletherapy sessions for parents, and with their years of experience for therapists. The top enabling factors were family participation and effective communication. The main challenges were time constraints and difficulty with instruction and monitoring associated with the two-dimensional nature of teletherapy. The benefits included empowerment of parents and enhanced understanding of the needs of their children. Discussion: The shift to teletherapy facilitated a heightened focus on family-centered care. The evaluation findings suggest that the general satisfaction with teletherapy and the benefits associated with family-centered care will likely promote teletherapy as a service delivery mode to continue beyond the pandemic.

scholarly journals Pediatric Nurses' Perspectives on Family-Centered Care in Sri Lanka: A Mixed-Methods Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-81
Author(s):  
Rishani Deepika Gangodage Done ◽  
Jina Oh ◽  
Mihae Im ◽  
Jiyoung Park
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Sri Lanka ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Sri Lankan ◽  
Family Centered Care ◽  
Children's Hospital ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Children’S Hospital ◽  
Imperfect Knowledge ◽  
Family Centered

Purpose: This study was conducted to investigate nurses’ perceptions and performance of family-centered care (FCC) at a children’s hospital in Sri Lanka and to explore the feasibility of implementing FCC in the context of the Sri Lankan healthcare system.Methods: A convergent, parallel, mixed-methods design was applied to understand Sri Lankan nurses’ perspectives on FCC. In total, 157 nurses working at a large teritagy children’s hospital responded to a self-report survey and 18 nurses participated in focus group interviews.Results: Of the factors of FCC, family participation in caring for children received the highest score (4.09±0.51) for perceptions, and information-sharing received the highest score (3.54±0.55) for performance. The qualitative data revealed the following five themes: (a) importance of the family in caring for children; (b) helping families during children’s hospitalization; (c) taking steps to implement FCC, even with imperfect knowledge; (d) barriers in the current situation; and (e) suggested strategies to promote FCC.Conclusion: Participants endorsed the concept of FCC and demonstrated some aspects of it in their day-to-day practice. The results indicate a clear knowledge deficit and several challenges, which need to be addressed to effectively implement FCC.

scholarly journals Nurses' Perception of Family-Centered Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units

2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 016-020
Author(s):  
Haydeh Heidari ◽  
Marjan Mardani-Hamooleh
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Units ◽  
Family Centered Care ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Conventional Content Analysis ◽  
Family Centered

AbstractFamily-centered care (FCC) is one of the important elements of care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The aim of this study was to understand the nurses' perception of FCC in NICUs. This qualitative study was performed using conventional content analysis. Participants in this study included 18 nurses who were selected by a purposeful method. Semistructured, in-depth and face-to-face interviews were conducted with the participants. All interviews were written down, reviewed, and analyzed. Two categories were identified after the data analysis: (1) prerequisite for providing FCC and (2) parents' participation. Prerequisite for providing FCC consisted of two subcategories namely suitable facilities and adequate personnel. Parents' participation included subcategories of parents: neonate's attachment and parents' training. Nurses' perception of FCC in NICUs can facilitate an appropriate condition for the participation of family members in the care of neonates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document