Correction: ‘National Disability Insurance Scheme and the Lived Experience of Psychosocial Disability for People Presenting to the Emergency Department: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study’. (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather McIntyre ◽  
Mark Loughhead ◽  
Laura Hayes ◽  
Nicholas Gerard Procter
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Lived Experience ◽  
Disability Insurance ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Insurance Scheme ◽  
Psychosocial Disability

UNSTRUCTURED In ‘National Disability Insurance Scheme and the Lived Experience of Psychosocial Disability for People Presenting to the Emergency Department: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study’ some errors were noted after publication. One author has requested a revision of the text; although the article was signed off the author’s contribution was not contained in the article.

scholarly journals National Disability Insurance Scheme and the Lived Experience of Psychosocial Disability for People Presenting to the Emergency Department: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather McIntyre ◽  
Mark Loughhead ◽  
Laura Hayes ◽  
Nicholas Gerard Procter
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Lived Experience ◽  
Research Team ◽  
Disability Insurance ◽  
Advisory Group ◽  
Insurance Scheme ◽  
Psychosocial Disability ◽  
Current Practices

BACKGROUND Currently, within Australia, 3.6% of all emergency department (ED) presentations are mental health–related. Information about the context of the person presenting to the ED (beyond immediate needs), including their psychosocial disability (PSD) National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) plan, is reported as incomplete and fragmented. There are missed opportunities for early intervention and care continuity that could potentially inform ED practitioners to revise current practices. OBJECTIVE The aims of this study are: (1) to obtain original data from the lived experience voice of those with the PSD NDIS plan and their experience when presenting to an ED, (2) to gather information from NDIS service providers to reveal communication pathways between the ED and NDIS services, and (3) to gain knowledge from ED clinicians around processes for continuity of care with this population group. METHODS This inductive, mixed methods phenomenological study will involve data collection analyzed sequentially, with each stage informing future stages of the research. Interviews will focus on the lived experience voice exploring potential indicators that have led to an ED presentation, alongside an analysis of associated clinical and administrative documentation and communications. Focus groups with NDIS support workers and support coordinators will provide phenomenological data around the experience from their perspective. National quantitative surveys among those with a PSD NDIS plan and emergency services clinicians will provide insight into current practices within community care and ED presentations. The research project design includes a lived experience advisory group who are assisting with the design of the interview and focus group schedules and national surveys, as well as in shaping the interpretation of qualitative information. All transcripts will be subject to thematic analysis to understand individuals’ meaning-making of these complex and particular phenomena. The research team includes a lived experience researcher and a lived experience carer (PhD candidate). RESULTS This study is funded by MIND Australia as a PhD industry scholarship, which commenced in April 2020. A systematic review as a preresearch activity has been completed and is currently under review. The Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of South Australia has approved this project. An advisory group has been selected, and interview, focus group, and survey schedules are currently being codesigned. Recruitment will commence in November 2021. It is envisaged that data collection will be completed by June 2022. CONCLUSIONS Understanding the lived experience of the precare, during care, and postcare stages of ED presentations from the perspective of those with a PSD NDIS plan will inform the research team around current practices and provide information about improvement for pathways of care for this vulnerable group of people, while also informing health policy. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT PRR1-10.2196/33268

Risk perception on the labour ward: A mixed methods study

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-63
Author(s):  
Claire McCarthy ◽  
Sarah Meaney ◽  
Marie Rochford ◽  
Keelin O’Donoghue
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Lived Experience ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Emergency Obstetric Care ◽  
Obstetric Care ◽  
Daily Basis ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Staff Support ◽  
Staff Wellbeing

Healthcare providers commonly experience risky situations in the provision of maternity care, and there has been increased focus on the lived experience in recent years. We aimed to assess opinions on, understanding of and behaviours of risk on the LW by conducting a mixed methods study. Staff working in a LW setting completed a descriptive questionnaire-based study, followed by qualitative structured interviews. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS on quantitative data and thematic analysis performed on qualitative data. Nearly two thirds of staff (64%; 73/114) completed the questionnaire, with 56.2% (n = 47) experiencing risk on a daily basis. Experiencing risk evoked feelings of apprehension (68.4%; n = 50) and worry (60.2%; n = 44) which was echoed in the qualitative work. Structured clinical assessment was utilised in risky situations, and staff described “ going on autopilot” to manage these situations. A large number of respondents reflected on their provision of care following an adverse event (87.7%; n = 64). Debriefing was mentioned as an important practice following such events by all respondents. This study describes the negative terminology prevailing in emergency obstetric care. These experiences can have a profound impact on staff. Risk reduction strategies and the provision of increased staff support and training are crucial to improve staff wellbeing in stressful scenarios.

scholarly journals Physicians’ and pharmacists’ use of My Health Record in the emergency department: results from a mixed-methods study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra K. Mullins ◽  
Heather Morris ◽  
Cate Bailey ◽  
Michael Ben-Meir ◽  
David Rankin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Health Record

Michigan Emergency Department Leader Attitudes Toward and Experiences With Clinical Pathways to Guide Admission Decisions: A Mixed‐methods Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 384-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Schechtman ◽  
Keith E Kocher ◽  
Michele M. Nypaver ◽  
Jason J. Ham ◽  
Melissa K. Zochowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Admission Decisions ◽  
Department Leader
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document