Separating features from functionality: A computational analysis of vaccination apps (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Shaw Jr ◽  
Devaki Nadkarni ◽  
Eric Phann ◽  
Rachel Sielaty ◽  
Madeleine Ledenyi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
The United States ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Vaccine Hesitancy ◽  
Health Providers ◽  
Immunization Practice ◽  
Star Rating

BACKGROUND Vaccines and immunizations are among the greatest public health accomplishments in disease prevention. Vaccinations not only protect the vaccinated individual but also others in the community. However, inadequate access to healthcare, a fragmented vaccine delivery system, vaccine hesitancy, and lack of vaccine literacy are some of the barriers for vaccination delivery faced by medical professionals and public health agencies. With information technology (IT) at the forefront of delivering quality healthcare, emerging vaccine mHealth technology can positively impact vaccination and immunization practice and benefit individuals, families, and the community. Smartphone apps focused on vaccination and immunizations have proliferated in the digital healthcare market, though their functionality, features, user reviews and limitations have not been comprehensively studied or evaluated. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate available vaccine apps on their functionality and features through a rigorous and systematic review with content analysis. Furthermore, we seek to identify potential limitations and drawbacks in the app's design, readability, and information exchange ability. Lastly, we propose recommendations and innovations that can be incorporated in current and future vaccine apps for improved user experience and user acceptance. METHODS Vaccine related apps from Android and iOS platforms were systematically searched and selected from the period between January to December 2019. A total of 119 apps were included in this review with 42 features evaluated according to the codebook guidelines. The apps selected were a mix of apps used in the United States and some used internationally, though Homebrew and Sideload apps were excluded. A comprehensive code book was developed to conduct content analysis on app functionalities and app features. We used principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce the dimensionality of the data. Further, cluster analysis was used with unsupervised machine learning to determine patterns within the data to group the apps based on pre-selected features. RESULTS The results indicate that readability (quality of being easy to read and understand) of the apps were highly correlated features. When examining the apps star rating score, iOS apps had an average star rating of 0.83 per Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) as compared to 2.63 for Android. Both the iOS and Android based apps had the privacy statements available with an average of 824.91 words. Cluster one of the K-means analysis contained 27 apps; they were shown to have the most expert involvement, personalized recommendations, and readability among all five clusters. CONCLUSIONS The study concluded that most of the apps evaluated were well received by end users. Privacy and security concerns around collection, storage and sharing of health data were addressed. Collaboration with health providers and public health officials during design and development can improve the overall functionality of the apps.

scholarly journals The Effects of Gamification and Oral Self-Care on Oral Hygiene in Children: Systematic Search in App Stores and Evaluation of Apps (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nino Fijačko ◽  
Lucija Gosak ◽  
Leona Cilar ◽  
Alenka Novšak ◽  
Ruth Masterson Creber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Behavior Change ◽  
Oral Hygiene ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Behavior Change Techniques ◽  
Evidence Based Dentistry

BACKGROUND Poor oral hygiene is a great public health problem worldwide. Oral health care education is a public health priority as the maintenance of oral hygiene is integral to overall health. Maintaining optimal oral hygiene among children is challenging and can be supported by using relevant motivational approaches. OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this study was to identify mobile smartphone apps that include gamification features focused on motivating children to learn, perform, and maintain optimal oral hygiene. METHODS We searched six online app stores using four search terms (“oral hygiene game,” “oral hygiene gamification,” “oral hygiene brush game,” and “oral hygiene brush gamification”). We identified gamification features, identified whether apps were consistent with evidence-based dentistry, performed a quality appraisal with the Mobile App Rating Scale user version (uMARS), and quantified behavior scores (Behavior Change score, uMARS score, and Coventry, Aberdeen, and London-Refined [CALO-RE] score) using three different instruments that measure behavior change. RESULTS Of 612 potentially relevant apps included in the analysis, 17 met the inclusion criteria. On average, apps included 6.87 (SD 4.18) out of 31 possible gamification features. The most frequently used gamification features were time pressure (16/17, 94%), virtual characters (14/17, 82%), and fantasy (13/17, 76%). The most common oral hygiene evidence-based recommendation was brushing time (2-3 minutes), which was identified in 94% (16/17) of apps. The overall mean uMARS score for app quality was high (4.30, SD 0.36), with good mean subjective quality (3.79, SD 0.71) and perceived impact (3.58, SD 0.44). Sufficient behavior change techniques based on three taxonomies were detected in each app. CONCLUSIONS The majority of the analyzed oral hygiene apps included gamification features and behavior change techniques to perform and maintain oral hygiene in children. Overall, the apps contained some educational content consistent with evidence-based dentistry and high-quality background for oral self-care in children; however, there is scope for improvement.

A Viewpoint of Security for Digital Health Care in the United States

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A. Demurjian ◽  
Alberto De la Rosa Algarín ◽  
Jinbo Bi ◽  
Solomon Berhe ◽  
Thomas Agresta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hard Copy ◽  
Health Providers ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Health Records

In health care, patient information of interest to health providers, researchers, public health researchers, insurers, patients, etc., is stored in different locations via electronic media and/or hard-copy formats. All potential users need electronic access to health information technology systems such as: electronic health records, personal health records, patient portals, and ancillary systems such as imaging, laboratory, pharmacy, etc. Controlling access to information from multiple systems requires granularity levels of privileges ranging from one patient to a cohort to an entire population. In this paper, we present a viewpoint of the state of secure digital health care in the United States, focusing on the resources that need to be protected as dictated by legal entities and regulations, the available approaches in the present state-of-the art, and, the potential needs for the future of security for digital health care. By utilizing a real world scenario, the authors explore the limitations of health information exchange in the United States, and present one possible architecture for secure digital health care that builds on existing technology alternatives.

Air pollution and your brain: what do you need to know right now

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (04) ◽  
pp. 329-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilian Calderón-Garcidueñas ◽  
Ana Calderón-Garcidueñas ◽  
Ricardo Torres-Jardón ◽  
José Avila-Ramírez ◽  
Randy J. Kulesza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Air Pollution ◽  
Particulate Matter ◽  
Fine Particles ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
The United States ◽  
Global Public Health ◽  
Health Providers ◽  
Parkinson’S Diseases ◽  
The Brain

Research links air pollution mostly to respiratory and cardiovascular disease. The effects of air pollution on the central nervous system (CNS) are not broadly recognized. Urban outdoor pollution is a global public health problem particularly severe in megacities and in underdeveloped countries, but large and small cities in the United States and the United Kingom are not spared. Fine and ultrafine particulate matter (UFPM) defined by aerodynamic diameter (<2.5-μm fine particles, PM2.5, and <100-nm UFPM) pose a special interest for the brain effects given the capability of very small particles to reach the brain. In adults, ambient pollution is associated to stroke and depression, whereas the emerging picture in children show significant systemic inflammation, immunodysregulation at systemic, intratechal and brain levels, neuroinflammation and brain oxidative stress, along with the main hallmarks of Alzheimer and Parkinson’s diseases: hyperphosphorilated tau, amyloid plaques and misfoldedα-synuclein. Animal models exposed to particulate matter components show markers of both neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. Epidemiological, cognitive, behavioral and mechanistic studies into the association between air pollution exposures and the development of CNS damage particularly in children are of pressing importance for public health and quality of life. Primary health providers have to include a complete prenatal and postnatal environmental and occupational history to indoor and outdoor toxic hazards and measures should be taken to prevent or reduce further exposures.

Nick Noguez and Michael Gonzalez Discuss their Research Project: Are Social Features in Mobile Health Apps Effective in Engaging Users? A Content Analysis of Smoking Cessation Mobile Apps

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Noguez And Michael Gonzalez
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Mobile Health ◽  
Social Engagement ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Mobile Apps ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Health Apps ◽  
Social Features ◽  
Mobile Health Apps

  Despite the ubiquity of smartphone ownership and the increasing integration of social engagement features in smoking cessation apps to engage users, thesocial engagement features that exist in current smoking cessation apps and how effective these social features are in engaging users remain unclear. To fill the gap in the literature, a content analysis of free and paid smoking cessation mobile apps isconducted to examine a) the presence of socialengagement features(e.g., social support, social announcement, social referencing) and non-social engagement features (e.g., personal environmental changes, goal setting), and b) their relationship with user ratingsand engagement scores (e.g., Mobile App rating scale [MARS]). The findings will not only extend the mobile health apps engagement typology,but also inform smoking cessation mobile apps design.

scholarly journals The European Union and Public Health Emergencies: Expert Opinions on the Management of the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Suggestions for Future Emergencies

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Gontariuk ◽  
Thomas Krafft ◽  
Cassandra Rehbock ◽  
David Townend ◽  
Loth Van der Auwermeulen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
European Union ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
European Commission ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
The Political ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Member States ◽  
Proper Actions ◽  
Public Health Emergencies

Objective: The first wave of the coronavirus SARS-COV-2 pandemic has revealed a fragmented governance within the European Union (EU) to tackle public health emergencies. This qualitative study aims: 1) to understand the current EU position within the field of public health emergencies taking the case of the COVID-19 as an example by comparing and contrasting experiences from EU institutions and experts from various EU Member States at the beginning of the pandemic; and, 2) to identify and to formulate future EU pandemic strategies and actions based on experts' opinions.Methods: Eighteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with public health experts from various European Member States and European Commission officials from May 2020 until August 2020. The transcripts were analyzed by Thematic Content Analysis (TCA), mainly a manifest content analysis.Results: This study demonstrated that the limited EU mandate in health hinders proper actions to prevent and tackle infectious disease outbreaks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The results showed that this limitation significantly impacted the ECDC, as the Member States' competence did not allow the agency to have more capacity. The European Commission has fulfilled its role of coordinating and supporting the Member States by facilitating networks and information exchange. However, EU intra- and inter-communication need further improvement. Although diverse EU instruments and mechanisms were found valid, their implementation needed to be faster and more efficient. The results pointed out that underlying political challenges in EU decision-making regarding health emergencies hinder the aligned response. It was stated that the Member States were not prepared, and due to the restriction of their mandate, EU institutions could not enforce binding guidelines. Additionally, the study explored future EU pandemic strategies and actions. Both, EU institutions and national experts suggested similar and clear recommendations regarding the ECDC, the investment, and future harmonized preparedness tools.Conclusion: The complex politics of public health at the EU level have led to the fragmentation of its governance for effective pandemic responses. This ongoing pandemic has shed light on the fragility of the political and structural systems in Europe in public health emergencies. Health should be of high importance in the political agenda, and robust health reforms at the local, regional, national, and EU levels are highly recommended.

scholarly journals Myths Surrounding Covid-19 Vaccine Candidates: A Guide to Fight Back

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Zizzo
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Herd Immunity ◽  
Vaccine Uptake ◽  
Protective Measure ◽  
Vaccine Hesitancy ◽  
Health Providers ◽  
Vaccine Candidates ◽  
The Public ◽  
News Organizations ◽  
Public Health Officials

The Covid-19 pandemic has propelled public health officials into the socio-political sphere due to the need for constantly updated information on behalf of the public. However, many individuals choose to acquire health information/guidance from indirect sources, including social media, news organizations, and general word of mouth. As a result, myths and false narratives about various essential health topics, including vaccine characteristics and protective measures, can circulate un-verified between millions of individuals with little recourse. These can further widen the “gap” between public knowledge and current research, resulting in lower vaccine uptake (vaccine hesitancy) and protective measure adherence. Such actions have profound implications as nations attempt to achieve herd immunity and end the pandemic once and for all. Thus, it is vital that public health officials, health providers, researchers, and the general public be able to differentiate common Covid-19 myths from facts and be prepared to approach such interactions via sound reasoning and research-based evidence. This chapter will serve as a guide to accomplish just that.

Age Differences in the Use of Health Information Technology Among Adults in the United States: An Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey

2020 ◽  
pp. 089826432096626
Author(s):  
Henry K. Onyeaka ◽  
Perla Romero ◽  
Brian C. Healy ◽  
Christopher M. Celano
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
Information Technologies ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
The United States ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Health Providers ◽  
Younger Adults ◽  
National Trends

Background: Despite significant advancements in the use of health information technologies (HITs) in health care, older adults’ adoption of new technologies has consistently lagged behind that of younger adults. Objective: To compare ownership rates and preferences for utilizing technology for health information exchange among older and younger adults. Methods: Utilizing data from the 2017 and 2018 iterations of the Health Information National Trends Survey ( n = 6789), we performed multivariable logistic regression while controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. Results: Older adults were less likely than younger adults to own technological devices such as smartphones, less likely to report finding these tools beneficial in monitoring their health, and less likely to use these tools in communicating with their health providers. However, these differences were substantially attenuated after adjustment for technology ownership. Discussion: Future research should aim to identify factors associated with access, usability, and adoption of HIT for managing care among older adults.

scholarly journals A content analysis of the quality and behaviour change techniques of smartphone apps promoting the Mediterranean diet

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (OCE2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel McAleese ◽  
Angeliki Papadaki
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Mediterranean Diet ◽  
Behaviour Change ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Subjective Quality ◽  
Behaviour Change Techniques ◽  
Smartphone Apps ◽  
The Mediterranean

AbstractThe popularity of smartphone apps is rising globally. However, the quality of widely available health apps and their effectiveness to promote behaviour change, by incorporating behavioural change techniques (BCTs) that have been suggested to result in behaviour change, is questionable. The aim of this study was to conduct a content analysis of smartphone apps that utilise the Mediterranean diet (MD), a dietary pattern linked to numerous health benefits, to promote healthy dietary behaviours. The specific objectives were to evaluate the quality of these apps and their use of BCTs. The iTunes Store and Google Play were searched for all available apps (free and requiring payment to download) promoting the MD. Apps were excluded if they were not available in English, did not focus only on the MD or the download process was corrupt. The Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) was used to assess app engagement, functionality, aesthetics and information quality (the average of which represents a quality mean score (QMS)) and subjective quality. The Abraham & Michie behaviour change taxonomy was adapted to create a 20-item checklist to assess the presence of BCTs in the eligible apps. Thirty nine apps (64.1% of which were free to download) were analysed. The overall QMS was 2.96 ± 0.46. The lowest and highest scored QMS constructs were engagement (2.42 ± 0.62) and functionality (3.95 ± 0.45), respectively, whilst the overall mean subjective quality score was 1.71 ± 0.51 (scores’ range 1–5). Apps were scored higher for aesthetics if they required payment (3.14 vs. 2.78, p = 0.047). Apps incorporated an average of 3.10 ± 1.87 BCTs, with no difference in the number of BCTs present according to platform or cost. From the five BCTs that have been suggested to promote behaviour change, ‘self-monitoring’ was present in six apps, ‘intention formation’ in 15 and ‘goal setting’ in one. None of the apps incorporated the ‘review of behavioural goals’ and ‘feedback on performance’ BCTs. The total QMS score was positively associated with the presence of BCTs (r = 0.409, p = 0.008). Based on the MARS assessment, apps promoting the MD that are available in the public domain were of moderate quality. In contrast, the low presence, particularly of efficacious, BCTs and low subjective quality scores suggest that apps are actually of poor quality and potentially not effective in promoting behaviour change towards an MD diet. These findings provide important insights for the future development of high-quality apps to promote the MD at population level.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document