Orthopaedic Residency Program Website Content and Accessibility During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad El Shatanofy ◽  
Lauryn Brown ◽  
Peter Berger ◽  
Alex Gu ◽  
Abhinav Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residency Program ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Research Opportunities ◽  
Sample Rotation ◽  
Residency Recruitment ◽  
Orthopaedic Residency ◽  
Residency Application ◽  
Surgery Residency Program

BACKGROUND The exceptional competitiveness of the orthopaedic surgery specialty, combined with the unclear impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on residency recruitment, has presented significant challenges to applicants and residency program directors.1 With limited in-person opportunities in the 2020-2021 application cycle, applicants have been pressed to gauge chances and best fit by browsing program websites. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to assess the accessibility and content of accredited orthopaedic surgery residency program websites during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Using the online database of the Electronic Residency Application Series (ERAS), we compiled a list of accredited orthopaedic residency programs in the United States. Program websites were evaluated across four domains: program overview, education, research opportunities, and application details. Each website was assessed twice in July, during a period of adjustment to the COVID-19 pandemic, and twice in November, following the October ERAS application deadline. RESULTS 189 accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs were identified through ERAS. Three programs did not have a website and were not evaluated for content. Data analysis of content in each domain revealed that most websites included program details, a description of the didactic curriculum, and sample rotation schedules. Between the two evaluation periods in July and November, the percentage of program websites containing informative videos and virtual tours rose from 12% to 48% and 1% to 13%, respectively (p<0.005). However, the number of programs that included information about a virtual sub-internship or virtual interview to their websites did not change. CONCLUSIONS Most residency program websites offered program details and an overview of educational and research opportunities; however, few addressed the virtual transition of interviews and sub-internships during the COVID-19 pandemic.

scholarly journals Gender Differences in Program Factors Important to Applicants When Evaluating Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 565-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Kroin ◽  
Dana Garbarski ◽  
Aoi Shimomura ◽  
Joseph Romano ◽  
Adam Schiff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residency Program ◽  
Ethnic Diversity ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Gender Diversity ◽  
Geographic Location ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Gender Specific Differences ◽  
Orthopaedic Residency ◽  
Surgery Residency Program ◽  
Racial Ethnic

ABSTRACT Background Despite specialty-driven efforts to improve diversity in the field, few women apply to orthopaedic residency, and women are unevenly distributed among programs. There is little evidence-based information on factors that may attract female applicants. Objective This study aims to identify factors important to applicants when evaluating orthopaedic residency programs and to identify gender-specific differences. Methods All applicants to a single orthopaedic surgery residency program in the 2017 Match were asked to fill out an anonymous survey. Respondents rated the importance of 35 factors when evaluating orthopaedic residency programs. The percentage of highly rated factors was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed for each factor to assess differences by gender. Results Of 1013 applicants who applied to orthopaedic surgery residency in 2017, 815 (80%) applied to our program, and 218 (27%) completed the survey. The most important factors when evaluating a residency program for both genders were (1) perceptions of current residents; (2) interactions with members of the program; (3) program reputation and fellowship placement; (4) geographic location; and (5) impressions after rotation at a program. Female applicants rated the presence of female and minority residents and faculty and program reputation for gender and racial/ethnic diversity higher than male applicants. Conclusions When choosing an orthopaedic surgery residency program, women more often reported the presence of female residents and faculty, program reputation for gender diversity, reputation for racial/ethnic diversity, presence of minority residents and faculty, and their personal interactions with members of the program as important factors.

scholarly journals The #Path2Path Virtual Landscape During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Preparing for the 2020 Pathology Residency Recruitment Season

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237428952110027
Author(s):  
Hannah Cutshall ◽  
Reagan Hattaway ◽  
Nikhi P. Singh ◽  
Soroush Rais-Bahrami ◽  
Brandi McCleskey
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
American Medical ◽  
Residency Program ◽  
Web Pages ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Residency Recruitment ◽  
Virtual Experiences ◽  
Residency Application ◽  
Medical Colleges

On May 11, 2020, the Association of American Medical Colleges released recommendations discouraging in-person activities for away rotations and mandating virtual-only residency recruitment interviews. This paper focuses on how residency programs have attempted to adjust to this vastly different application cycle by using social media to reach their applicants. A total of 138 programs were identified through the Electronic Residency Application Services. The presence of Departmental/Residency program Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook as well as web pages offering virtual opportunities was recorded for each program on October 30, 2020. A total of 132 social media accounts were found; the majority of which were on Twitter, while fewer were on Instagram and Facebook. All 138 pathology residency programs had websites. Sixteen (11.5%) of those advertised virtual open houses and 2 (1.4%) advertised virtual subinternships; social media were more often used for advertisement of these virtual experiences. A total of 58 open house opportunities were advertised on Twitter, 21 on Instagram, and 20 on Facebook. Innovative virtual subinternships ranging from 2 to 4 weeks were developed, but only represented 6% of the usual 126 away rotations available. Pathology programs across the country utilized websites and social media as a method of communication to interact with applicants as part of the #Path2Path in 2020 and to provide virtual opportunities in preparation for a drastically different recruitment cycle.

Do Orthopedic Surgery Residency Program Web Sites Address Diversity and Inclusion?

2021 ◽  
pp. 155633162110376
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Mortman ◽  
Alex Gu ◽  
Peter Berger ◽  
Samrat Choudhury ◽  
Simone A. Bernstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Web Sites ◽  
Residency Program ◽  
Orthopedic Surgery ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Medical Specialties ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Diversity And Inclusion ◽  
Application Service ◽  
Residency Application ◽  
Surgery Residency Program

Background: Orthopedic surgery is one of the least diverse medical specialties. Other medical specialties have employed diversity-related initiatives to increase the number of students underrepresented in medicine (URM). Furthermore, with the suspension of visiting student rotations during the COVID-19 pandemic, medical students used residency program Web sites as a main source of program-specific information. Aims/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure the extent to which orthopedic surgery residency program Web sites describe diversity and inclusion initiatives. Methods: The Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) was used to identify U.S. orthopedic surgery residency programs. The programs’ Web sites were reviewed, and data on commitments to diversity and inclusion were collected. Descriptive statistics of these data were generated. Results: There were 192 residency programs identified and 3 were excluded from the analysis due to lack of Web sites. Of the remaining 189 residency program Web sites, only 55 (29.10%) contained information on diversity and inclusion. Information on a commitment to improving diversity and inclusion was the most prevalent data point found among program Web sites, although it was found on only 15% of program Web sites. Conclusion: Orthopedic surgery residency programs rarely address topics related to diversity and inclusion on their program Web sites. An emphasis on opportunities for URM students and initiatives related to diversity and inclusion on program Web sites may improve URM outreach and serve as one method for increasing URM matriculation into orthopedic surgery.

scholarly journals COVID-19 and the Ophthalmology Residency Match: Data from Applicants' Perspectives

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. e73-e77
Author(s):  
Benjamin Steren ◽  
Ankur Parikh ◽  
Bilal Ahmed ◽  
Benjamin Young ◽  
Jayanth Sridhar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interest Groups ◽  
The United States ◽  
Application Process ◽  
Substantial Impact ◽  
Clinical Exposure ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Informed Decisions ◽  
Rank List ◽  
Perceived Impacts ◽  
Residency Application

Abstract Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a profound impact on medical education, particularly for those applying to residency programs in 2020 to 2021. This study describes the challenges for potential ophthalmology residency applicants so that residency leadership can make informed decisions about changes to the process. Methods A survey was distributed electronically via social media and medical school ophthalmology interest groups from June 18, 2020 to July 2, 2020 to individuals interested in applying to ophthalmology residency in the United States. Survey questions included demographics and perceived impacts of COVID-19 on ability, confidence, intention to apply, and perceptions toward changes in the application process for the 2020 to 2021 ophthalmology residency application cycle. Results One-hundred sixteen total responses were received. Eighty-six responses (74%) were from individuals intending to apply in the 2020 to 2021 application cycle. Most respondents (86%) felt that their application would be affected by COVID-19 with 51% feeling less confident. Only four (5%) felt that they could adequately compile a rank list following a video interview, and over half (51%) anticipated applying to more programs than they originally intended. Academic plans of seven (8%) respondents were significantly altered via deferral of application or cancellation of a research year. Thirty-nine (45%) students reported delayed ophthalmology electives, with less than half (41%) feeling that they had adequate clinical exposure to be prepared for residency. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on the 2020 to 2021 ophthalmology residency application cycle. As stakeholders begin to approach this cycle, these findings will help them make effective and informed decisions to create the best overall experience for all involved.

OHNS Residency Program and Applicant Social Media Presence During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
pp. 000348942098797
Author(s):  
Shadi Ahmadmehrabi ◽  
Deborah X. Xie ◽  
Bryan K. Ward ◽  
Paul C. Bryson ◽  
Patrick Byrne
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Application Process ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Social Media Presence ◽  
Residency Application ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Residency Match

Objectives: In addition to clinical and social disruption, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected many aspects of the otolaryngology residency application process. With delays in the 2021 Electronic Residency Applications Service (ERAS) timeline, students and programs have had more time to interact prior to the formal application process. This communication will report recent trends in social media presence by OHNS residency programs, and discuss mechanisms to compensate for decreased applicant-program interactions using social media ahead of the 2021 Match. Methods: In a cross-sectional study of the accredited otolaryngology residency programs in the United States, the number of social media profiles on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook from 2009 to 2019 were recorded and compared. Results: Most programs (61%) have at least 1 social media profile. Over the past 10 years, the number of programs on social media has increased. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Twitter and Instagram showed higher rates of growth compared to Facebook. With the reduction of in-person opportunities for interactions, both applicants and programs are utilizing social media to showcase their values and their research. Twitter, in particular, also serves as a platform for professional networking. Conclusion: Both Twitter and Instagram are growing in popularity among programs and applicants to enhance networking. Social media is a powerful tool for networking and may help compensate for limitations imposed on the residency match process by the COVID-19 pandemic while maintaining professionalism considerations. The impact of social media on the 2021 otolaryngology residency match is an evolving phenomenon.

scholarly journals The Importance of International Medical Rotations in Selection of an Otolaryngology Residency

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 414-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan H Boyd ◽  
Raul M Cruz
Keyword(s):  
Residency Program ◽  
General Interest ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
International Elective ◽  
Program Selection ◽  
Application Service ◽  
Residency Application ◽  
Lifestyle Research ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to determine the extent of interest in international electives among prospective otolaryngology residents and to determine whether the availability of international electives affected students' interest in ranking a particular residency program. Methods A 3-part survey was given to all medical students enrolled in the 2008 otolaryngology match via the Electronic Residency Application Service. Part 1 elicited demographic information. Part 2 explored general interest in international rotations. Part 3 involved ranking several factors affecting students' choice of residency programs. This survey was developed at our institution, with no formal validation. Participation was anonymous and voluntary. Results A total of 307 students entered the otolaryngology match, and 55 surveys (18%) were completed. Twenty-five of 55 students (55%) had completed an international elective during or prior to medical school, and 51 of 55 respondents (93%) had a “strong” or “very strong” desire to participate in an international elective during residency; 48 of 55 students (87%) had a “strong” or “very strong” desire to participate in international surgical missions after residency. Future practice goals had no correlation with interest in international rotations, either during or after residency training. Respondents ranked 8 factors that had an impact on residency program selection in the following order of importance: operative experience, location, lifestyle, research opportunities, didactics, international electives, prestige of program, and salary. Conclusion Interest in international medicine among prospective otolaryngologists was high in this subset of respondents but did not appear to affect residency program selection.

scholarly journals Diversity and Inclusion on General Surgery, Integrated Thoracic Surgery, and Integrated Vascular Surgery Residency Program Websites

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Mortman ◽  
Harold A. Frazier ◽  
Yolanda C. Haywood
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Vascular Surgery ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Residency Program ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Diversity And Inclusion ◽  
Related Information ◽  
Application Service ◽  
Surgery Residency Program

ABSTRACT Background Increasing diversity in medicine is receiving more attention yet underrepresented in medicine (UiM) surgeons remain a small fraction of all surgeons. Whether surgical training programs attempt to attract UiM applicants to their programs, and therefore their specialties, through program website information is unclear. Objective To analyze the scope of diversity and inclusion (D&I) related information on US allopathic and osteopathic general surgery, integrated thoracic surgery, and integrated vascular surgery residency program websites. Methods Residency programs were identified through the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) in July 2020. We searched surgical program websites and collected data on the presence or absence of variables labeled “diversity & inclusion” or “underrepresented in medicine.” Variables found on program websites as well as sites linked to the program website were included. We excluded programs identified in ERAS as fellowship training programs. Programs without webpages were also excluded. Results We identified 425 residency programs and excluded 22 from data analysis. Only 75 of the 403 included programs (18.6%) contained D&I-related information. The presence of individual variables was also low, ranging from 4.5% for opportunities related to early exposure to the specialty to 11.1% for a written or video statement of commitment to D&I. Conclusions In 2020, as recruitment and interviews moved entirely online, few US allopathic and osteopathic general surgery, integrated thoracic surgery, and integrated vascular surgery residency programs provided D&I-related information for residency applicants on their program websites.

scholarly journals Residency Setting Association With Resident Substance Use Disorder Training: A CERA Secondary Data Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-201
Author(s):  
Joshua St. Louis ◽  
Emma Worringer ◽  
Wendy B. Barr
Keyword(s):  
Substance Use ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Residency Program ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
The United States ◽  
Resident Training ◽  
Addiction Medicine ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Family Medicine Residency

Background and Objectives: As the opioid crisis worsens across the United States, the factors that impact physician training in management of substance use disorders become more relevant. A thorough understanding of these factors is necessary for family medicine residency programs to inform their own residency curricula. The objective of our study was to identify factors that correlate with increased residency training in addiction medicine across a broad sample of family medicine residencies. Methods: We performed secondary analysis of a national family medicine residency program director survey conducted in 2015-2016 (CERA Survey PD-8). We obtained data from the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) Data Clearinghouse. We analyzed residency clinic site designation as a patient-centered medical home (PCMH), federally-qualified health center (FQHC), or both, for their correlation with faculty member possession of DEA-X buprenorphine waiver license, as well as required residency curriculum in addiction medicine. Results: Residency programs situated in an FQHC were more likely to have faculty members who possessed DEA-X buprenorphine waiver licenses (P=.025). Residency clinics that were both a PCMH as well as an FQHC also correlated strongly (P=.001). Furthermore, residencies with faculty who possessed a DEA-X license were significantly more likely to have a required curriculum in addiction medicine (P=.002). Conclusions: Our quantitative secondary analysis of CERA survey data of family medicine residency program directors revealed that resident training in addiction medicine is strongly correlated with both residency clinic setting (FQHC or FQHC/PCMH) as well as residency faculty possession of DEA-X licenses.

scholarly journals Are There Gender-based Differences in Language in Letters of Recommendation to an Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Program?

2019 ◽  
Vol 478 (7) ◽  
pp. 1400-1408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey N. Kobayashi ◽  
Robert S. Sterling ◽  
Sean A. Tackett ◽  
Brant W. Chee ◽  
Dawn M. Laporte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residency Program ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Gender Based ◽  
Surgery Residency Program ◽  
Letters Of Recommendation

Training in Formal Psychotherapy in the Psychiatric Residency Program

1968 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 445-454
Author(s):  
John D. Adamson ◽  
Harry Prosen ◽  
William Bebchuk
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Residency Program ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Practical Experience ◽  
The United States ◽  
Direct Result ◽  
Psychiatric Residency ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Theoretical Approaches ◽  
Psychodynamic Understanding

This report has been prepared by the Nucleus Committee of the Section on Psychotherapy of the Canadian Psychiatric Association. It is based on a questionnaire study of training in formal psychotherapy in psychiatric residency programs. We received replies from ten of the twelve university centres in Canada which currently have such programs, and from some selected centres in the United States and Great Britain. Our findings support the contention that psychoanalytically-based training in psychotherapy is a generally accepted mandatory feature of residency programs in Canada. This training is carried out in a similar way in both the United States and Canada. Our study indicated that there is a tendency in Canada for this training not to be as organized as it should be and we recommend that steps be taken to improve this situation. Particular concerns were lack of knowledge of the numbers of patients treated in psychotherapy by a resident during the residency program and the number treated for more than a year. Stemming from the further discussions of the Nucleus Committee, recognizing the facts that there are a number of different valid theoretical orientations to psychotherapy and that there are differences among centres which lead to different teaching techniques, we also recommended: a) That the resident be exposed to different theoretical approaches, but in such a way as to avoid excessively confusing him. b) As one method of achieving objective (a), that a resident receive supervision from at least two different teachers during his residency. c) That, providing other aspects of the program are adequate, didactic seminars need not total more than forty. d) Because interviewing skills and psychodynamic understanding are essential skills of the psychiatrist, that whatever the particular orientation and methods pertaining to training in psychotherapy in a teaching setting, the psychotherapeutic approach should pervade the resident's total learning experience. e) That formal training in psychotherapy should begin in the first residency year, with the practical experience optimally being individualized according to the resident's level of development of psychotherapeutic skills. f) That the resident should have experience in treating patients in formal psychotherapy for more than a year. g) Where the resident's experience of psychotherapy deviates significantly from what he can expect when he is fully qualified, that the nature and implications of these deviations be clarified with him by the supervisor (s); these deviations include failure to obtain objective (f), and limitations on psychotherapy that are a direct result of factors that are unique to the training situation. We also commented on other features of the supervisory role, including responsibilities to patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document