Emergency Physician Experiences with Electronic Health Records in the United States and Norway: Qualitative Study (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gracie Palmer ◽  
Christopher Crenner

BACKGROUND Physician attitudes regarding Electronic Health Records (EHR) are widely recognized. It has also been established that both human and technologic components contribute to user satisfaction. This study compares emergency physician EHR experiences between the United States and Norway. OBJECTIVE The primary outcome analyzes individual perceptions of Health Information Technology (HIT). It examines independent variables that influence overall user experience within a socio-political-technical context. Fundamental differences between nations will also be addressed. METHODS This exploratory study used semi-structured, respondent-driven, in-depth interviews (n=12) that were recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted using grounded theory and ethnography. RESULTS Potential benefits and disadvantages were acknowledged by all physicians. Both cohorts reported increased clerical burden. Overall, Norwegians were more likely to report positive EHR experiences while American dissatisfaction was disproportionally high. US frustrations were multifactorial all resulting with similar consequences- generation of excessive data with little clinical value. They also felt EHRs prioritized capital gain over healthcare optimization. Norwegian complaints mainly involved technology dysfunction. The initiative “One Patient, One Record” (Én innbygger - én journal) will soon result in a single EHR provider (Epic Systems) for the entire nation. Currently, all EHRs in Norway are connected to a national health information exchange (HIE) platform known as the “core journal” (Kjernejouralen) which contains prescription and critical medical information to providers across the country. US physicians expressed interest in having a version of this tool as they often cannot obtain outside patient records. CONCLUSIONS Despite differences spanning geographic, organizational, and cultural boundaries much is to be learned by direct comparison of individual experiences. This study suggests policy, regulation, and culture may have greater influence on overall user experience rather than technology itself. Global EHR optimization requires additional investigation and these results help establish foundation for future research.

JAMIA Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth T Toll ◽  
Maria A Alkureishi ◽  
Wei Wei Lee ◽  
Stewart F Babbott ◽  
Philip A Bain ◽  
...  

AbstractWe present findings of an international conference of diverse participants exploring the influence of electronic health records (EHRs) on the patient–practitioner relationship. Attendees united around a belief in the primacy of this relationship and the importance of undistracted attention. They explored administrative, regulatory, and financial requirements that have guided United States (US) EHR design and challenged patient-care documentation, usability, user satisfaction, interconnectivity, and data sharing. The United States experience was contrasted with those of other nations, many of which have prioritized patient-care documentation rather than billing requirements and experienced high user satisfaction. Conference participants examined educational methods to teach diverse learners effective patient-centered EHR use, including alternative models of care delivery and documentation, and explored novel ways to involve patients as healthcare partners like health-data uploading, chart co-creation, shared practitioner notes, applications, and telehealth. Future best practices must preserve human relationships, while building an effective patient–practitioner (or team)-EHR triad.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S819-S820
Author(s):  
Jonathan Todd ◽  
Jon Puro ◽  
Matthew Jones ◽  
Jee Oakley ◽  
Laura A Vonnahme ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Over 80% of tuberculosis (TB) cases in the United States are attributed to reactivation of latent TB infection (LTBI). Eliminating TB in the United States requires expanding identification and treatment of LTBI. Centralized electronic health records (EHRs) are an unexplored data source to identify persons with LTBI. We explored EHR data to evaluate TB and LTBI screening and diagnoses within OCHIN, Inc., a U.S. practice-based research network with a high proportion of Federally Qualified Health Centers. Methods From the EHRs of patients who had an encounter at an OCHIN member clinic between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016, we extracted demographic variables, TB risk factors, TB screening tests, International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9 and 10 codes, and treatment regimens. Based on test results, ICD codes, and treatment regimens, we developed a novel algorithm to classify patient records into LTBI categories: definite, probable or possible. We used multivariable logistic regression, with a referent group of all cohort patients not classified as having LTBI or TB, to identify associations between TB risk factors and LTBI. Results Among 2,190,686 patients, 6.9% (n=151,195) had a TB screening test; among those, 8% tested positive. Non-U.S. –born or non-English–speaking persons comprised 24% of our cohort; 11% were tested for TB infection, and 14% had a positive test. Risk factors in the multivariable model significantly associated with being classified as having LTBI included preferring non-English language (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.09–4.32); non-Hispanic Asian (aOR 5.17, 95% CI 4.94–5.40), non-Hispanic black (aOR 3.02, 95% CI 2.91–3.13), or Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander (aOR 3.35, 95% CI 2.92–3.84) race; and HIV infection (aOR 3.09, 95% CI 2.84–3.35). Conclusion This study demonstrates the utility of EHR data for understanding TB screening practices and as an important data source that can be used to enhance public health surveillance of LTBI prevalence. Increasing screening among high-risk populations remains an important step toward eliminating TB in the United States. These results underscore the importance of offering TB screening in non-U.S.–born populations. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2018 ◽  
Vol 136 (2) ◽  
pp. 164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele C. Lim ◽  
Michael V. Boland ◽  
Colin A. McCannel ◽  
Arvind Saini ◽  
Michael F. Chiang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 159 (6) ◽  
pp. 2221-2225.e6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shailendra Singh ◽  
Mohammad Bilal ◽  
Haig Pakhchanian ◽  
Rahul Raiker ◽  
Gursimran S. Kochhar ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Chun Moon ◽  
Rebecca Hills ◽  
George Demiris

BackgroundLittle is known about optimisation of electronic health records (EHRs) systems in the hospital setting while adoption of EHR systems continues in the United States.ObjectiveTo understand optimisation processes of EHR systems undertaken in leading healthcare organisations in the United States.MethodsInformed by a grounded theory approach, a qualitative study was undertaken that involved 11 in-depth interviews and a focus group with the EHR experts from the high performing healthcare organisations across the United States.ResultsThe study describes EHR optimisation processes characterised by prioritising exponentially increasing requests with predominant focus on improving efficiency of EHR, building optimisation teams or advisory groups and standardisation. The study discusses 16 types of optimisation that interdependently produced 16 results along with identifying 11 barriers and 20 facilitators to optimisation.ConclusionsThe study describes overall experiences of optimising EHRs in select high performing healthcare organisations in the US. The findings highlight the importance of optimising the EHR after, and even before, go-live and dedicating resources exclusively for optimisation.


2017 ◽  
pp. 960-973
Author(s):  
Karen Ervin

This chapter examines the literature of healthcare in the United States during the transitioning to electronic records. Key government legislation, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH), which were part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and the Affordable Health Care Act, are reviewed. The review concentrates on patient privacy issues, how they have been addressed in these acts, and what recommendations for improvement have been found in the literature. A comparison of the adoption of electronic health records on a nationwide scale in three countries is included. England, Australia, and the United States are all embarking in and are at different stages of implementing nationwide electronic health database systems. The resources used in locating relevant literature were PubMed, Medline, Highwire Press, State Library of Pennsylvania, and Google Scholar databases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document