Community Case Managers’ (CCMs) perspectives’ collaborating with primary care services when managing complex patients in the community: a qualitative study. (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilbert Tian Seng Yeo ◽  
Predeebha Kannan ◽  
Eng Sing Lee ◽  
Helen Elizabeth Smith

BACKGROUND Strong collaboration between community case managers (CCMs) and medical professionals are vital for the continuity of complex patients’ care in the community. Key challenges can influence or even deter successful collaboration. OBJECTIVE The objective of this qualitative study was to understand the challenges encountered by CCMs when collaborating with primary care services. METHODS This exploratory qualitative descriptive study used individual in-depth interviews. CCMs were selected using maximum variation and snowball sampling. The interviews were semi-structured, guided by a topic guide. Data were analyzed alongside ongoing data collection. Thematic content analysis was used to analyze the transcripts. Initial codes were obtained independently. These codes were then further explored, clarified and iteratively grouped into themes. RESULTS Fourteen individual in-depth interviews were conducted. Six themes emerged from the data i.e. self-identity, patient factor, inter-professional factor, collaborative culture, confidentiality and organizational structure. Challenges that resonated with previous studies were self-identity, inter-professional factors and confidentiality, whereas other challenges such as patient factors, collaborative culture, and organizational structure, were unique to Singapore’s health care landscape. CONCLUSIONS Significant challenges were encountered by CCMs when collaborating with primary care services. Understanding these challenges is key to refining intervention in current models of comprehensive community care between medical and non-medical professionals.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilbert Yeo ◽  
Predeebha Kannan ◽  
Eng Sing Lee ◽  
Helen Smith

Abstract Background: Strong collaboration between community case managers (CCMs) and medical professionals are vital for the continuity of complex patients’ care in the community. Key challenges can influence or even deter successful collaboration. Objective: The objective of this qualitative study was to understand the challenges encountered by CCMs when collaborating with primary care services. Methods: This exploratory qualitative descriptive study used individual in-depth interviews. CCMs were selected using maximum variation and snowball sampling. The interviews were semi-structured, guided by a topic guide. Data were analyzed alongside ongoing data collection. Thematic content analysis was used to analyze the transcripts. Initial codes were obtained independently. These codes were then further explored, clarified and iteratively grouped into themes.Results: Fourteen individual in-depth interviews were conducted. Six themes emerged from the data i.e. self-identity, patient factor, inter-professional factor, collaborative culture, confidentiality and organizational structure. Challenges that resonated with previous studies were self-identity, inter-professional factors and confidentiality, whereas other challenges such as patient factors, collaborative culture, and organizational structure, were unique to Singapore’s health care landscape.Conclusions: Significant challenges were encountered by CCMs when collaborating with primary care services. Understanding these challenges is key to refining intervention in current models of comprehensive community care between medical and non-medical professionals.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heriberto F. Sanchez ◽  
Andrea Maria D. Vargas ◽  
Marcos Azeredo F. Werneck ◽  
Efigênia F. Ferreira

Knowledge of patients' views can contribute to the strengthening of health services. The aim of this study is to describe the patients' perception of a public oral health service, contributing to evaluations in health services. This is a qualitative study in which a focus group was conducted, with the participation of six patients of the oral health system in the city of Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, all with a minimum experience of three years of using the service. A theoretical model with dimensions aimed at assessing integrality and primary care services was used. In conducting the research, a semi-structured script was used. The data were analyzed by content analysis. The most representative categories for evaluating oral health actions in primary care are the health unit; the welcoming and its relation with the creation of the bond; service with a strong emphasis on the humanized relationship between professional and patient and on teamwork and; as a highlight, citizen participation, based on the recognition of a “system” that prevents the proper functioning of services and that must be fought with citizenship. Patients’ perceptions can be used to assess oral health in primary care from the perspective of those who actually use health services, seeking ultimately to constantly improve them. Knowledge of patients' perceptions may enable organizations to know their performance, through assessment methodologies based on the established perceptions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heriberto F. Sanchez ◽  
◽  
Andrea Maria D. Vargas ◽  
Marcos Azeredo F. Werneck ◽  
Efigênia F. Ferreira

Knowledge of patients' views can contribute to the strengthening of health services. The aim of this study is to describe the patients' perception of a public oral health service, contributing to evaluations in health services. This is a qualitative study in which a focus group was conducted, with the participation of six patients of the oral health system in the city of Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, all with a minimum experience of three years of using the service. A theoretical model with dimensions aimed at assessing integrality and primary care services was used. In conducting the research, a semi-structured script was used. The data were analyzed by content analysis. The most representative categories for evaluating oral health actions in primary care are the health unit; the welcoming and its relation with the creation of the bond; service with a strong emphasis on the humanized relationship between professional and patient and on teamwork and; as a highlight, citizen participation, based on the recognition of a “system” that prevents the proper functioning of services and that must be fought with citizenship. Patients’ perceptions can be used to assess oral health in primary care from the perspective of those who actually use health services, seeking ultimately to constantly improve them. Knowledge of patients' perceptions may enable organizations to know their performance, through assessment methodologies based on the established perceptions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Pina ◽  
Paloma López-Ros ◽  
Aurelio Luna-Maldonado ◽  
Aurelio Luna Ruiz-Caballero ◽  
Bartolomé Llor-Esteban ◽  
...  

Background: Workplace violence is a social problem of special interest in both intervention and research. Among the sectors that most perceive this type of violence, health care professionals stand out. The most common type of violence for this professional group is the one perpetrated by the users or patients themselves. It has been reported that one out of every four acts of violence in the workplace occurs in the healthcare setting. Within the health sector, the Mental Health, Emergency and Primary Care services have been widely reported as being among the most vulnerable, with Primary Care being the least addressed of the three. Although the available literature is extensive, there are hardly any studies that explore from a qualitative perspective what are the sources of conflict in this sector from the perspective of the users, the most common being to work with professionals.Objective: The aim of this study is to examine those aspects derived from the organization, the professionals or the users of Primary Care that, from the users' point of view, cause violent situations and how they think these could be avoided.Method: The sample consisted of 80 users of the Primary Care services of the Health Service of Murcia. For data collection, a qualitative study was conducted through 10 focus groups and a subsequent thematic analysis of the data.Results: The results have allowed us to identify that, from an organizational point of view, the uncertainty in waiting times, the need to adapt the telematic or telephone appointment to the different types of users, or the management of emergencies in Primary Care are the aspects that cause most conflicts between users and professionals. In this sense, suggested improvements are aimed at providing information in the mobile application updated on the opening hours or maintaining the telephone appointment for those who need or request it, among many others. As for the professionals, users point out that the medical staff is perceived as distant and sometimes does not provide enough information on the health status of users. Another professional group widely addressed in the focus groups was the administrative staff, being described as lacking in communication skills, assertiveness, or empathy. Users recognize the existence of a demanding/aggressive profile among users, who makes instrumental use of violence to achieve privileges over users in general. We have also identified the profile of the user who makes use of Primary Care as a way of socializing or managing conflicts of a socioemotional nature. As proposals for this thematic block, users suggest group therapies, the use of audiovisual material complementary to the information provided by professionals or community interventions in psychoeducation.Conclusion: This study allows to explore conflicts between users and professionals from the Primary Care patients' perspective. Our results are complementary to the available evidence that has used the professional's approach to study the phenomenon of workplace violence. The identification of sources of conflict and the assessment and contribution of users on possible ways of improvement can serve as a basis for the design of prevention and intervention plans to improve the work environment in Primary Care centers.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heriberto F. Sanchez ◽  
Andrea Maria D. Vargas ◽  
Marcos Azeredo F. Werneck ◽  
Efigênia F. Ferreira

Knowledge of patients' views can contribute to the strengthening of health services. The aim of this study is to describe the patients' perception of a public oral health service, contributing to evaluations in health services. This is a qualitative study in which a focus group was conducted, with the participation of six patients of the oral health system in the city of Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, all with a minimum experience of three years of using the service. A theoretical model with dimensions aimed at assessing integrality and primary care services was used. In conducting the research, a semi-structured script was used. The data were analyzed by content analysis. The most representative categories for evaluating oral health actions in primary care are the health unit; the welcoming and its relation with the creation of the bond; service with a strong emphasis on the humanized relationship between professional and patient and on teamwork and; as a highlight, citizen participation, based on the recognition of a “system” that prevents the proper functioning of services and that must be fought with citizenship. Patients’ perceptions can be used to assess oral health in primary care from the perspective of those who actually use health services, seeking ultimately to constantly improve them. Knowledge of patients' perceptions may enable organizations to know their performance, through assessment methodologies based on the established perceptions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document