Vision Screening and Self-Testing by Mobile-Based Automated Visual Acuity Assessments Apps: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingge Suo ◽  
Xianghan Ke ◽  
Di Zhang ◽  
Xuejiao Qin ◽  
Xunhao Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Global Public Health ◽  
Health Issues ◽  
Self Testing ◽  
Art Research ◽  
Psychophysical Test

BACKGROUND Vision impairments (VI) and blindness are one of the core global public health issues. Visual acuity (VA) is one of the most crucial standard psychophysical test of visual function, and used widely in a broad range of healthcare domain, especially in many clinical settings. OBJECTIVE To assess the accuracy and application of using Mobile devices-based visual acuity measurement apps. METHODS We searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published between January 1, 2008 and July 1 2020. Two reviewers independently selected studies that assessed the mobile-based VA measurement apps. We included all studies that assessed a tablet and/or smartphone VA measurement apps. RESULTS Most of the enrolled 22 studies considered as high quality studies, evaluating by QUADAS-2. In meta-analysis, six studies involving 24284 participants were included. In 3~5 years old group, the pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% CI 0.79, 0.93); the pooled specificity was 0.78 (95% CI 0.70, 0.85); In 6~22 years old group, the pooled sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI 0.84, 0.87); the pooled specificity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.90, 0.91). In ≥55 years old group, the pooled sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI 0.55, 0.98); the pooled specificity was 0.98 (95% CI 0.95, 0.99). CONCLUSIONS In this study, we conducted a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art research to investigate the diagnostic value and limitations of existing mobile-based VA test applications. Evidence from this study shows that mobile-based app VA measurements may be useful tools for VI detection.

scholarly journals The diagnostic value of EBV-DNA and EBV-related antibodies detection for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weixing Liu ◽  
Gui Chen ◽  
Xin Gong ◽  
Yingqi Wang ◽  
Yaoming Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Ebv Dna ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background Numerous individual studies have investigated the diagnostic value of EBV-DNA, EA-IgA, VCA-IgA, EBNA1-IgA and Rta-IgG detection for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the conclusions remain controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the value of EBV-DNA, EA-IgA, VCA-IgA, EBNA1-IgA and Rta-IgG detection in the diagnosis of NPC. Methods PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019145532. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Chinese data libraries (Wanfang, CNKI, and CBM) were searched up to January 2019. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood, negative likelihood, and diagnostic odds ratios were conducted in this meta-analysis. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves evaluated the test-performance global summary. Publication bias was examined by Deek’s funnel plot asymmetry test. Results Forty-seven studies with 8382 NPC patients (NPC group) and 15,089 individuals without NPC (Control group) were included in this meta-analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood (+ LR), negative likelihood (-LR), DOR and AUC of EBV-DNA in diagnosis of NPC were: 0.76 (95% CI 0.73–0.77), 0.96 (95% CI 0.95–0.97), 14.66 (95% CI 9.97–21.55), 0.19 (95% CI 0.13–0.28), 84 (95% CI 50.45–139.88), 0.96 (SE: 0.001), and 0.55 (95% CI 0.54–0.57), 0.96 (95% CI 0.96–0.97), 12.91 (95% CI 9.55–17.45), 0.35 (95% CI 0.29–0.43), 39.57 (95% CI 26.44–59.23), 0.94 (SE: 0.002) for the EA-IgA, and 0.85 (95% CI 0.84–0.85), 0.89 (95% CI 0.88–0.89), 6.73 (95% CI5.38–8.43), 0.17 (95% CI 0.12–0.23), 43.03 (95% CI 31.51–58.76), 0.93 (SE: 0.007) for the VCA-IgA, and 0.86 (95% CI 0.85–0.88), 0.87 (95% CI 0.88–0.90), 7.55 (95% CI 5.79–9.87), 0.16 (95% CI 0.13–0.19), 50.95 (95% CI 34.35–75.57), 0.94 (SE: 0.008) for the EBNA1-IgA, and 0.70 (95% CI 0.69–0.71), 0.94 (95% CI 0.94–0.95), 9.84 (95% CI 8.40–11.54), 0.25 (95% CI 0.21–0.31), 40.59 (95% CI 32.09–51.35), 0.95 (SE: 0.005) for the Rta-IgG. The EBV-DNA had larger AUC compared with other EBV-based antibodies (P < 0.05), while the difference between EA-IgA, VCA-IgA, EBNA1-IgA and Rta-IgG was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusions EBV-DNA, VCA-IgA, EBNA1-IgA and Rta-IgG detection have high accuracy in early diagnosis NPC. In addition, EBV-DNA detection has the higher diagnosis accuracy in NPC. On the other hand, EA-IgA is suitable for the diagnosis but not NPC screening.

scholarly journals Association of inflammatory markers with the severity of COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Furong Zeng ◽  
Ying Guo ◽  
Mingzhu Yin ◽  
Xiang Chen ◽  
Guangtong Deng
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Weighted Mean Difference ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Global Public Health ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Bias Assessment ◽  
Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Severe Group

AbstractBackgroundThe ongoing worldwide epidemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV- 2), has posed a huge threat to global public health. However, with regard to the effects of inflammatory markers on the severity of COVID-19, studies have reported associations that vary in strength and direction.AimsIn the meta-analysis, we aimed to provide an overview of the association of inflammatory markers with severity of COVID-19.MethodsThe following databases were searched: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang database and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) database until March 20, 2020. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random or fixed-effects models.ResultsA total of 16 studies were included in our analysis comprising of 3962 patients with COVID-19. Random-effects results demonstrated that patients with COVID-19 in non-severe group had lower levels for CRP (WMD = -41.78 mg/l, 95% CI = [-52.43, - 31.13], P < 0.001), PCT (WMD = -0.13 ng/ml, 95% CI = [-0.20, -0.05], P < 0.001), IL- 6 (WMD = -21.32 ng/l, 95% CI = [-28.34, -14.31], P < 0.001), ESR (WMD = - 8.40 mm/h, 95% CI = [-14.32, -2.48], P = 0.005), SAA (WMD = -43.35 μg/ml, 95% CI = [-80.85, -5.85], P = 0.020) and serum ferritin (WMD = -398.80 mg/l, 95% CI = [- 625.89, -171.71], P < 0.001), compared with those in severe group. Moreover, survivors had lower level for IL-6 than non-survivors with COVID-19 (WMD = -4.80 ng/ml, 95% CI = [-5.87, -3.73], P < 0.001). These results were consistent through sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessment.ConclusionsThe meta-analysis highlights the association of inflammatory markers with the severity of COVID-19. Measurement of inflammatory markers might help clinicians to monitor and evaluate the severity and prognosis of COVID-19.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Value of TLE1 in Synovial Sarcoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sarcoma ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc El Beaino ◽  
Daniel C. Jupiter ◽  
Tarek Assi ◽  
Elie Rassy ◽  
Alexander J. Lazar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Synovial Sarcoma ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Specific Marker ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Depth Analysis ◽  
The Mean

Background. Synovial sarcoma can present morphologically in multiple forms, including biphasic and monophasic subtypes. As a result, the histological diagnosis can sometimes be challenging. Transducin-Like Enhancer 1 (TLE1) is a transcriptional corepressor that normally is involved in embryogenesis and hematopoiesis but is also expressed in certain tumors. This systematic review examines the potential role of TLE1 as a diagnostic biomarker for the synovial sarcoma. Materials and Methods. A literature review and meta-analysis were conducted using the electronic databases Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Thirteen studies met our eligibility criteria and were selected for in-depth analysis. Results. The mean sensitivity and specificity of TLE1 in detecting synovial sarcoma were 94% (95% CI 91%–97%) and 81% (95% CI 72%–91%), respectively, when all studies were aggregated together. The mean positive predictive value (PPV) of TLE1 was 75% (95% CI 62%–87%), whereas the negative predictive value (NPV) was 96% (95% CI 93%–98%). Conclusion. TLE1 is a sensitive and specific marker for synovial sarcoma that can aid in its diagnosis. Due to its involvement in several relevant signaling pathways, TLE1 might have direct relevance to the pathophysiology of the disease.

The diagnostic value of RASSF1A promoter methylation in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su-Liang Li ◽  
Ye-Xing Li ◽  
Yun Ye ◽  
Xiao-Hua Yuan ◽  
Jian-Jun Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Comprehensive Search ◽  
Larger Sample

AbstractBackgroundRASSF1A promoter methylation is consistent with clinicopathological data and has good accuracy in distinguishing tumors. However, the diagnostic parameters vary among previous studies. A systematic review was conducted to explore the diagnostic value of RASSF1A promoter methylation in prostate cancer.MethodsA comprehensive search of the literature in the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase and ISI Web of Science databases up to May 21, 2020 was performed. STATA software version 12.0 and Meta-disc version 1.4 were used to analyze the data.ResultsThe pooled sensitivity was 0.64 (95% CI 0.61–0.66), the pooled specificity was 0.80 (95% CI 0.77–0.83), the PLR was 3.82 (95% CI 1.96–7.44), and the NLR was 0.29 (95% CI 0.16–0.52). Furthermore, the pooled DOR of RASSF1A promoter methylation for prostate cancer was 13.08 (95% CI: 6.56–26.08). The area under the summary ROC curve was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84–0.90). The results of the meta-regression suggested that heterogeneity was mainly derived from publication year. Fagan’s nomogram showed that the predictive accuracy was increased significantly by detecting RASSF1A promoter methylation for diagnosing prostate cancer.ConclusionThis meta-analysis suggests that detection of the RASSF1A promoter methylation status can be used for the diagnosis of PCa. In the future, further analyses and studies of larger sample sizes in large centers are needed to confirm our conclusion.

scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of MRA and MRI for the bursal-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Huang ◽  
Jian Liu ◽  
Yupeng Ma ◽  
Dongsheng Zhou ◽  
Liang Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Mr Arthrography ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Partial Thickness ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background Numerous quantitatively studies have focused on the diagnosis of bursal-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (RCTs); however, the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR arthrography (MRA) remains inconclusive. This study was performed systematically to compare the diagnostic value of MRA and MRI for the bursal-sided partial-thickness RCTs. Methods Three electronic databases, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, were utilized to retrieve articles comparing the diagnostic value of MRA and MRI for detecting bursal-sided partial-thickness RCTs. After screening and diluting out the articles that met the inclusion criteria to be used for statistical analysis, the pooled evaluation indexes include sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Twelve studies involving 1740 patients and 1741 shoulders were identified. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and AUC of MRA to diagnose bursal-sided partial-thickness RCTs were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67–0.85), 0.98 (95% CI, 0.95–0.99), 73.01 (95% CI, 35.01–152.26), and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85–0.91), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and AUC of MRI were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.66–0.86) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.81–0.99), and 37.12 (95% CI, 8.08–170.64) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78–0.85), respectively. Conclusions This meta-analysis reveals that MRA and MRI have similar diagnostic value for the diagnosis of bursal-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Value of MRA and MRI for The Articular-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianxin Li ◽  
Jinlei Dong ◽  
Qinghu Li ◽  
Jinye Dong ◽  
Dongsheng Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Mr Arthrography ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Initial Examination ◽  
Partial Thickness ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background: This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR arthrography (MRA) for the articular-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tear (PTRCT).Methods: Three electronic databases, PubMed/Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library, were utilized to retrieve articles comparing the diagnostic value of MRA and MRI for detecting articular-sided PTRCTs. The pooled statistical indexes included sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Eleven studies involving 1703 patients and 1704 shoulders were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC and their 95% CIs of MRA to diagnose articular-sided PTRCTs were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.65-0.90), 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98), 68.14 (95% CI, 33.20-139.84) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC and their 95% CIs of MRI were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65-0.87) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.84-0.99), 47.82 (95% CI, 8.29-275.89) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.92), respectively.Conclusions: This meta-analysis reveals that MRA has a better diagnostic value than that of MRI for the diagnosis of articular-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears, but only small improvement of sensitivity. Considering the price and invasion of MRA, MRI is recommended as an initial examination to detect patients suspected with articular-side partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.

scholarly journals Comparison of Patient Outcomes following Implantation of Trifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Yining Guo ◽  
Yinhao Wang ◽  
Ran Hao ◽  
Xiaodan Jiang ◽  
Ziyuan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Visual Disturbance ◽  
Intraocular Lenses ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Depth Of Focus ◽  
Near Vision ◽  
Extended Depth Of Focus ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Comprehensive Search

Purpose. The purpose is to compare the outcomes of implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses (TIOLs) and extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrial.gov was conducted in March 2020 to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis of the results was performed. Patients implanted with EDOF IOLs or TIOLs in previous studies were included. The primary outcomes of the study were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and defocus curve. Results. TIOLs and EDOF IOLs provided comparable binocular UDVA (MD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.04, 0.03, logMAR). However, EDOF IOLs provided better UIVA (MD: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.14, -0.01, logMAR) and worse UNVA (MD: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.14, logMAR) than TIOLs. Fewer patients achieved spectacle independence after implantation of EDOF IOLs (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.87) than after implantation of TIOLs, especially for near vision (RR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.99). There was no statistically significant difference in contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic or mesopic conditions with both IOLs. Patient satisfaction after implantation of both IOLs was high. Conclusion. EDOF IOLs and TIOLs provide comparable distance vision. However, EDOF IOLs provide better intermediate vision and worse near vision than TIOLs. The advantages of EDOF IOLs over TIOLs in terms of CS, aberrations, and visual disturbance are not significant. Patients are satisfied with both types of IOLs.

scholarly journals The diagnostic value of D-dimer in acute aortic dissection: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Yao ◽  
Tao Bai ◽  
Bo Yang ◽  
Lizhong Sun
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
D Dimer

Abstract Objective This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of D-dimer for acute aortic dissection (AAD) by the method of meta-analysis. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang databases from the establishment of the databases to December 2020 were systematically searched, and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) system was used to evaluate the quality of the literature. STATA 15.0 software was applied to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (−LR) to draw summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) curve and calculate the area under the curve (AUC). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were used to explore the source of heterogeneity. Results A total of 16 clinical studies were enrolled in this study, including 1135 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity was 0.96 (95% CI 0.91–0.98), the pooled specificity was 0.70 (95% CI 0.57–0.81), and the pooled DOR was 56.57 (95% CI 25.11–127.44), the pooled +LR was 3.25 (95% CI 2.18–4.85), the pooled −LR was 0.06 (95% CI 0.03–0.12), and the AUC was 0.94 (95% CI 0.91–0.95). Meta-regression and subgroup analysis results showed that publication year, sample size and cutoff value might be sources of heterogeneity. When the concentration of D-dimer was less than or equal to 500 ng/ml, the sensitivity significantly increased. Conclusion D-dimer has an excellent diagnostic value for AAD. It is a useful tool for detecting suspected AAD because of the excellent pooled sensitivity. D-dimer ≤ 500 ng/ml increases the potential to identify the suspected patients with AAD.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of resting myocardial contrast echocardiography: a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 19-28
Author(s):  
Lijun Qian ◽  
Feng Xie ◽  
Di Xu ◽  
Thomas R Porter
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Contrast Echocardiography ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Background: Resting myocardial perfusion (MP) and wall motion (WM) imaging during real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) improves the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, its prognostic role in different clinical settings (emergency department and outpatient setting) remains unclear. Methods: A systematic search in PubMed and Embase databases, and the Cochrane library, was conducted to evaluate the role of resting MP and WM in predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (NFMI) and urgent revascularization in patients presenting to either outpatient clinics or emergency departments with suspected symptomatic CAD. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, sensitivity and specificity plots were applied to assess diagnostic performance using RevMan 5.3. Results: Seven studies met criteria, including 3668 patients (six with follow up ranging from 2 days to 2.6 years). The Relative Risk (RR) for predicting MACE in patients with both abnormal resting MP and WM was 6.1 (95% CI, 5.1–7.2) and 14.3 (95% CI, 10.3–19.8) for death/NFMI, when compared to normal resting MP and WM patients. Having both abnormal resting MP and WM was also more predictive of MACE (RR, 1.7; 95% CI 1.5–1.9) and death/NFMI (RR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.8–2.7) when compared to abnormal WM with normal resting MP. Conclusion: In this meta-analysis of both ED and outpatient clinic presentations for suspected CAD, having both a resting regional MP and WM abnormality identifies the highest risk patient for adverse events.

scholarly journals Prognostic and diagnostic value of circRNA expression in colorectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinpeng Yuan ◽  
Dongming Guo ◽  
Xinxin Li ◽  
Juntian Chen
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Circular Rnas ◽  
Control Factors ◽  
Potential Biomarker ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale

Abstract Background: Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are new stars in the network of noncoding RNAs and are regarded as key control factors in numerous tumours. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical, prognostic and diagnostic role of circRNAs in colorectal cancer. The quality of all the articles were assessed by the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. Methods: An online search in electronic databases, including the PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science online databases, was conducted to identify as many relevant papers as possible. Nineteen relevant studies were enrolled in this meta-analysis, with seven on diagnosis, eight on prognosis and 11 on clinicopathological features. Results: For the diagnostic value of circRNAs, the pooled results showed that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.82 for identifying patients with colorectal cancer, with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 72%. In terms of prognosis, carcinogenic circRNAs have a negative effect on overall survival (OS: HR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.50-3.52), and increases in tumour suppressor circRNA expression are associated with longer survival (OS: HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.22-0.64). And the elevated expression of oncogenic circRNAs is associated with poor clinical features while tumor suppressor circRNAs are the complete opposite. Conclusions: These results suggest that circRNAs may be a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document