scholarly journals The Association between a Low Carbohydrate Diet, Quality of Life and Glycemic Control in Australian Adults living with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study Protocol (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine Paul ◽  
Rati Jani ◽  
Peter Davoren ◽  
Cathy Knight-Agarwal

BACKGROUND Globally, the prevalence of type 1 diabetes (T1DM) is rising. In 2020, 124,652 Australians had T1DM. Maintaining optimal glycemic control [HbA1c ≤7.0% (≤53 mmol/mol)] on a standard carbohydrate diet can be a challenge for people living with T1DM. The Diabetes Complications and Control Trial established that macrovascular and microvascular complications could be reduced by improving glycemic control. Recent studies have found that a very low or low carbohydrate diet can improve glycemic control. However, the overall evidence relating to an association between a very low or low carbohydrate diet and glycemic control in people living with T1DM is both limited and mixed. In addition, research has suggested that poor quality of life (QoL) due to anxiety and depression adversely influences glycemic control. Despite a potential link between a very low or low carbohydrate diet and good glycemic control, no research to our knowledge has examined an association between a very low or low carbohydrate diet, QoL and glycemic control, making this study unique in its approach. OBJECTIVE The study aims to: 1) develop a validated diabetes specific quality of life questionnaire for use in Australian adults with T1DM and 2) determine if an association exists between a low carbohydrate diet, quality of life and glycemic control in Australian adults living with T1DM. METHODS This cross-sectional study will be conducted in a tertiary hospital outpatient setting and will consist of three phases. Phase 1, online Australian diabetes specific quality of life questionnaire development and piloting (n=25-30 T1DM adults); Phase 2, questionnaire validation (n=364 T1DM adults) and Phase 3, a 12-week dietary intervention to determine if an association exists between a low carbohydrate diet, QoL and glycemic control in adults with T1DM (n=16-23 T1DM adults). The validation of the study developed Australian diabetes specific quality of life questionnaire and change in HbA1c and QoL in adults with T1DM while undertaking a low carbohydrate diet over 12 weeks will be the primary outcomes of this study. RESULTS No results are currently available. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first of its kind and will firstly generate a new validated instrument, which could be used in evidence-based practice and research to understand T1DM adults QoL. Secondly, the low carbohydrate dietary intervention outcomes could be used to inform clinicians about an alternative approach to assist T1DM Australian adults to improve their QoL and glycemic control. Finally, this study could warrant the development of an evidence based low carbohydrate dietary guideline for adults living with T1DM with the potential to have a profound impact on this population. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04213300; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04213300

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Tulipan ◽  
Barbara Kofler

Background: The ketogenic diet (KD), a high-fat low-carbohydrate diet, has gained in popularity in recent years, which is reflected by an increasing number of scientific articles, books, websites, and other publications related to low carbohydrate (LC) diets and KDs. Numerous preclinical studies in different animal models of cancer have examined the effect of KDs on cancer growth, but no large randomized controlled studies or prospective cohort studies are available for human cancer patients. Evidence supporting the use of KDs as an adjunct to traditional cancer therapy has come predominantly from anecdotes and case reports. The first KD clinical trials in patients with glioblastoma revealed good acceptance and a possible anti-tumor effect. Metabolic therapy options such as the KD are not yet part of the standard of care in cancer patients. However, many cancer patients have begun implementing a KD or LC diet on their own. The aim of the present study was to gather information, via an online questionnaire, about how cancer patients go about implementing a KD or LC diet, what resources they rely on, whether they perceive benefits from the diet on quality of life (QoL), and what factors influence feasibility and adherence to the diet.Method: Recruitment of participants was carried out via social media platforms, forums and cooperating physicians (April 2018 through November 2018). To be eligible for the study, participants had to be diagnosed with cancer and on a KD or LC diet at the time of participating in the study or been on a KD or LC diet during cancer treatment. Study participants were asked to fill out an online questionnaire. The questionnaire was divided into four parts and contained a total of 64 questions. The questions were focused on the current health status of the participant, type of cancer, time since diagnosis, and treatment regimen. In addition, questions addressed social support, extent of professional counseling, food preferences and QoL.Results: A total of 96 participants (77 F, 17 M) submitted the questionnaire, of which 94 were included in the final data analysis. Ages ranged between 24 and 79 years (mean 50.1 ± 12.1 years). In 73.4% of the participants, the tumor had not formed metastases at the time of initial diagnosis. Twenty-four (26%) participants had a PET-positive tumor, 8 (9%) a PET-negative tumor, and the remainder (66.0%) did not report a PET scan. Eighty seven percent had undergone surgery in the course of their cancer treatment. The most frequent tumor type was breast cancer, followed by cervical cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer and melanoma. Fifty nine percent of the study participants stated that they followed a KD during cancer therapy, 21% followed a low carbohydrate/high fat (LCHF) diet and 12% followed a low glycemic index (LOGI) diet. Sixty nine percent reported an improvement of QoL because of the diet. Almost half of the study participants sourced their initial information on KDs and LC diets from the internet. We found a significant correlation between weight loss upon implementation of a KD and the extent of overweight (p < 0.001). Weight loss in already lean participants was not reported. Overall, 67% of the participants found long-term adherence to the diet to be “easy” and 10.6% described it as being “very easy.” Participants who like fatty foods tended to perceive the diet as being easier to follow (p = 0.063).Conclusion: The KD or LC diet improved self-reported QoL in more than two-thirds of study participants. The KD had a normalizing effect on body weight. The majority of the participants rated the diet as easy or very easy to follow long term. There was an obvious gap between patients' desire for professional dietary counseling and what is currently offered by health care providers. In the future, efforts should be made to invest in nutrition experts who are trained in the KD to support cancer patients with implementation of a KD.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000514 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S Leeds ◽  
Marios Hadjivassiliou ◽  
Solomon Tesfaye ◽  
David S Sanders

ObjectivesLower gastrointestinal symptoms are not well characterized in people with type 1 diabetes, and the effects on quality of life and glycemic control are unknown. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of lower gastrointestinal symptoms and the effects on glycemic control and quality of life, and to investigate for underlying causes.Research design and methodsThis is a prospective, cohort study in secondary care. Patients with type 1 diabetes completed a gastrointestinal symptom questionnaire and the Short Form 36 V.2 quality of life questionnaire and had their hemoglobin A1c measured. Patients with diarrhea were offered reassessment and investigation as per the national guidelines. Controls without diabetes were used to compare symptom prevalence and quality of life scores.Results 706 with type 1 diabetes (mean age 41.9 years) and 604 controls (mean age 41.9 years) were enrolled. Gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly more frequent in type 1 diabetes compared with controls, in particular constipation (OR 2.4), diarrhea (OR 2.5), alternating bowel habit (OR 2.1), abdominal pain (OR 1.4), floating stools (OR 2.7), bloating (OR 1.4) and flatulence (OR 1.3) (all p<0.05). Previous pancreatitis was more frequent in type 1 diabetes (OR 4.6), but other gastrointestinal conditions were not. Gastrointestinal symptoms were associated with poorer glycemic control (p<0.01) and worse quality of life particularly in those with diarrhea. Investigation of those with diarrhea, including those with alternating bowel habit, (n=105), identified a cause in 72.3% with subsequent change in management.ConclusionsGastrointestinal symptoms are twice as common in type 1 diabetes and associated with poorer quality of life and glycemic control. Investigation of diarrhea in people with type 1 diabetes leads to a high yield of treatable conditions and a change in management in about three-quarters.


2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 706-708.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory L. Austin ◽  
Christine B. Dalton ◽  
Yuming Hu ◽  
Carolyn B. Morris ◽  
Jane Hankins ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document