scholarly journals The psychosocial predictors and real-time antecedents of substance use among participants recruited via an online crowdsourcing platform in the United States: an ecological momentary assessment study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Payaal Jain ◽  
Claudine Offer ◽  
Christopher Rowe ◽  
Caitlin Turner ◽  
Carol Dawson-Rose ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Substance use is a major public health problem and contributes substantially to the burden of disease among adults throughout the United States (US). To inform interventions, there is a need to identify the antecedents of substance use by collecting data in real-time using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Also, crowdsourcing platforms like Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) which leverage the internet to conduct research used in conjunction with EMA, may improve the scientific rigor of addiction science. OBJECTIVE We aimed to: 1) utilize EMA data and examine the temporal relationship between day-level cravings for alcohol and stimulants (e.g., cocaine, crack cocaine, and methamphetamine) and substance use (i.e., heavy drinking or any drug use) in a given day; and 2) assess whether depression, negative affect, and self-esteem measured at baseline predicted substance use in a given day, among participants recruited using MTurk. METHODS Adults in the US who reported alcohol or stimulant use (i.e., crack cocaine, cocaine, or methamphetamine) in the past year, were recruited using MTurk in 2018. Participants completed a baseline survey assessing socio-demographics, and psychosocial factors, and daily diaries assessing substance use, and cravings for alcohol and stimulants, online. Four multivariable random-intercept logistic regression models were built to examine psychosocial constructs separately along with other significant predictors from bivariate analyses, controlling for age and education. RESULTS Among a total of 272 participants, the average age was 36.1 (standard deviation [SD]=10.5), most (80.8%) were white and male (73.9%), and 65.3% were men who reported having sex with other men (MSM). At baseline, 63.8% engaged in any current or past hazardous alcohol consumption, 15.3% reported using cocaine, 10.1% reported using methamphetamine, 4.4% reported using crack cocaine, and 38.2% reported any non-injection or injection drug use in the past six months. On a scale from 0-100, median day-level cravings for alcohol, methamphetamine, cocaine and crack cocaine were; 5 (interquartile range [IQR]=0-26), 54 (IQR=20-88), 39 (IQR=1-71), and 52 (IQR=51-87), respectively. In multivariable analyses, factors independently associated with substance use in a given day were: higher baseline levels of depression (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.11, 95% CI=1.02-1.21, P=0.01), and negative affect (aOR=1.08, 95% CI=1.01-1.16, P=0.01), lower levels of self-esteem (aOR=0.90, 95% CI=0.82-0.98, P=0.02), and greater day-level cravings for alcohol (aOR=1.02, 95% CI=1.01-1.03, P<0.001), and stimulants (aOR=1.03, 95% CI=1.01-1.04, P=0.01). Lastly, MSM had a higher odds of engaging in substance use in a given day in all final models: (aOR=4.90, 95% CI=1.28-18.70, p=0.02); (aOR=5.47, 95% CI=1.43-20.87, p=0.01); (aOR=5.99, 95% CI=1.55-23.13, p=0.009); and (aOR=4.94, 95% CI=1.29-18.84, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Substance use interventions should utilize evidenced-based approaches to reduce depression, negative affect, and cravings, increase self-esteem, and engage MSM. Interventions may also consider leveraging mobile health platforms to more effectively reduce substance use among populations who use crowdsourcing platforms.

2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Wonderlich ◽  
Jason M. Lavender ◽  
Stephen A. Wonderlich ◽  
Carol B. Peterson ◽  
Scott J. Crow ◽  
...  

Alcohol ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 31-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Kuerbis ◽  
M. Carrington Reid ◽  
Jordan E. Lake ◽  
Suzette Glasner-Edwards ◽  
Jessica Jenkins ◽  
...  

Assessment ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1683-1698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey B. Scott ◽  
Martin J. Sliwinski ◽  
Matthew Zawadzki ◽  
Robert S. Stawski ◽  
Jinhyuk Kim ◽  
...  

Despite widespread interest in variance in affect, basic questions remain pertaining to the relative proportions of between-person and within-person variance, the contribution of days and moments, and the reliability of these estimates. We addressed these questions by decomposing negative affect and positive affect variance across three levels (person, day, moment), and calculating reliability using a coordinated analysis of seven daily diary, ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and diary-EMA hybrid studies (across studies age = 18-84 years, total Npersons = 2,103, total Nobservations = 45,065). Across studies, within-person variance was sizeable (negative affect: 45% to 66%, positive affect: 25% to 74%); in EMA more within-person variance was attributable to momentary rather than daily level. Reliability was adequate to high at all levels of analysis (within-person: .73-.91; between-person: .96-1.00) despite different items and designs. We discuss the implications of these results for the design of future intensive studies of affect variance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1160-1160
Author(s):  
Julianne Wilson ◽  
Amanda R Rabinowitz ◽  
Tessa Hart

Abstract Objective In persons with moderate–severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI), we compared traditional measures of mood with dynamic measures of affect derived from ecological momentary assessment (EMA), for the purpose of validating the EMA indices and exploring their unique contributions to emotional assessment. Method 23 community-dwelling participants with chronic msTBI were enrolled in a treatment trial for anxiety and/ or depression. At baseline, participants completed the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 Depression and Anxiety subscales (BSI-D, BSI-A) and the Environmental Reward Observation Scale (EROS), a measure of everyday pleasure and reward. EMA data, including the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS), were collected via smartphone 5 times daily for 7–14 days prior to treatment (M = 8.65; SD = 1.87). Spearman correlations tested associations between baseline BSI-D, BSI-A, and EROS scores with both overall means and temporal variability measures for positive and negative affect (PA, NA). Results Mean PA was significantly correlated with BSI-D (rho −0.60, p &lt; 0.05) and EROS (rho 0.72, p &lt; 0.01). Mean NA and affect variability measures were uncorrelated with baseline scores. NA mean and variability were intercorrelated (rho 0.87, p &lt; 0.001), but this was not the case for PA. Conclusion EMA measures of averaged positive affect showed robust relationships with retrospective measures of depression and environmental reward, providing support for the validity of EMA measures of PA, and for use of the EROS in msTBI. While negative findings must be interpreted with caution, the lack of association of affective variability with retrospective measures suggest a unique role for EMA in examining temporal dynamics of affect.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 2382-2387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail A. Williams-Kerver ◽  
Kristine J. Steffen ◽  
Kathryn E. Smith ◽  
Li Cao ◽  
Ross D. Crosby ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 135910532094780
Author(s):  
Katrin Kukk ◽  
Kirsti Akkermann

We aimed to assess the interplay between dietary restraint and emotion regulation (ER) difficulties as well as other well-known risk factors of binge eating in a community sample of women. Altogether 96 women (mean age 21.5 years; mean BMI 21.7) participated in the study using ecological momentary assessment. Structural equation modeling indicated that restraint and ER pathways are related yet operate independently in predicting binge eating in a unified model. ER difficulties moderated the effect of negative affect and fluctuations in negative affect in predicting binge eating while Neuroticism and preoccupation with body weight predicted binge eating indirectly.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document