scholarly journals Using a Virtual Guide and Digital Technology to Deliver Evidence-Based Practices for Suicidal Patients in the Emergency Department: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda A. Dimeff ◽  
David A. Jobs ◽  
Kelly Koerner ◽  
Nadia Kako ◽  
Topher Jerome ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Emergency departments (EDs) offer the promise of providing suicide prevention evidence-based practices at the point of need to patients who are acutely suicidal. However, few EDs have adequate time and personnel resources to deliver recommended evidence-based assessment and interventions. We developed Jaspr Health, a tablet-based application that enables the delivery of four evidence-based practices for patients who are acutely suicidal at the point of need to help raise the standard of care in ED settings. OBJECTIVE This study aims to test the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of Jaspr Health among suicidal adults in EDs. METHODS Patients who were acutely suicidal and seeking psychiatric crisis services participated in a pilot randomized controlled trial while in the ED. Participants were assigned randomly to Jaspr Health (n=14) or care-as-usual (CAU) control (n=17). RESULTS Conditions differed significantly at baseline on age, but not on other demographic variables or baseline measures. On average, participants had been in the ED for 17 hours prior to enrolling in the research study. Over their lifetimes, 74% of the sample had made a suicide attempt (M=3.4; SD=6.4) and 61% had engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behaviors, with an average rate of 8.8 times in the past three months. All established feasibility and acceptability criterion were met: no adverse events occurred, participants’ app usage was high, Jaspr Health app satisfaction ratings were high, and all Jaspr Health participants recommended its use for other suicidal ED patients. Comparisons between study conditions further support the application’s effectiveness: Jaspr Health participants reported a statistically significant increase in receiving four evidence-based suicide prevention interventions. Additionally, significant decreases in distress and agitation along with significant increases in learning to cope more effectively with current and future suicidal thoughts were observed among the Jaspr Health participants. Finally, in comparison to CAU, Jaspr Health participants provided higher satisfaction ratings of their overall ED experience. CONCLUSIONS Even with limited statistical power, results showed Jaspr Health to be feasible, acceptable, and clinically effective for use with ED patients who are acutely suicidal and seeking ED-based psychiatric crisis services. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03584386

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (12) ◽  
pp. 1218-1224
Author(s):  
Dror Ben-Zeev ◽  
Benjamin Buck ◽  
Suzanne Meller ◽  
William J. Hudenko ◽  
Kevin A. Hallgren

10.2196/16253 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. e16253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian E Betz ◽  
Christopher E Knoepke ◽  
Scott Simpson ◽  
Bonnie J Siry ◽  
Ashley Clement ◽  
...  

Background Counseling to reduce access to lethal means such as firearms and medications is recommended for suicidal adults but does not routinely occur. We developed the Web-based Lock to Live (L2L) decision aid to help suicidal adults and their families choose options for safer home storage. Objective This study aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of L2L among suicidal adults in emergency departments (EDs). Methods At 4 EDs, we enrolled participants (English-speaking, community-dwelling, suicidal adults) in a pilot randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized in a 13:7 ratio to L2L or control (website with general suicide prevention information) groups and received a 1-week follow-up telephone call. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between the intervention (n=33) and control (n=16) groups. At baseline, many participants reported having access to firearms (33/49, 67%), medications (46/49, 94%), or both (29/49, 59%). Participants viewed L2L for a median of 6 min (IQR 4-10 min). L2L also had very high acceptability; almost all participants reported that they would recommend it to someone in the same situation, that the options felt realistic, and that L2L was respectful of values about firearms. In an exploratory analysis of this pilot trial, more participants in the L2L group reported reduced firearm access at follow-up, although the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions The L2L decision aid appears feasible and acceptable for use among adults with suicide risk and may be a useful adjunct to lethal means counseling and other suicide prevention interventions. Future large-scale studies are needed to determine the effect on home access to lethal means. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03478501; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03478501


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian E Betz ◽  
Christopher E Knoepke ◽  
Scott Simpson ◽  
Bonnie J Siry ◽  
Ashley Clement ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Counseling to reduce access to lethal means such as firearms and medications is recommended for suicidal adults but does not routinely occur. We developed the Web-based <i>Lock to Live</i> (L2L) decision aid to help suicidal adults and their families choose options for safer home storage. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of L2L among suicidal adults in emergency departments (EDs). METHODS At 4 EDs, we enrolled participants (English-speaking, community-dwelling, suicidal adults) in a pilot randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized in a 13:7 ratio to L2L or control (website with general suicide prevention information) groups and received a 1-week follow-up telephone call. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar between the intervention (n=33) and control (n=16) groups. At baseline, many participants reported having access to firearms (33/49, 67%), medications (46/49, 94%), or both (29/49, 59%). Participants viewed L2L for a median of 6 min (IQR 4-10 min). L2L also had very high acceptability; almost all participants reported that they would recommend it to someone in the same situation, that the options felt realistic, and that L2L was respectful of values about firearms. In an exploratory analysis of this pilot trial, more participants in the L2L group reported reduced firearm access at follow-up, although the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS The L2L decision aid appears feasible and acceptable for use among adults with suicide risk and may be a useful adjunct to lethal means counseling and other suicide prevention interventions. Future large-scale studies are needed to determine the effect on home access to lethal means. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03478501; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03478501


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document