Pilot Study of Online Information Seeking Behaviors of Low Literacy Latina Breast Cancer Survivors (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Iacobelli ◽  
Ginger Dragon ◽  
Giselle Mazur ◽  
Judith Guitelman

BACKGROUND Internet searching has become an increasingly useful tool for seeking health information. However, it is largely textual in nature and written for high literacy populations. Therefore, low literacy Latinas are at a disadvantage when searching online for health-related answers as well as processing online resources. Internet searching presents a problem, as low literacy populations tend to make mistakes while typing, ending up with misleading search results lists. In addition, even if an appropriate result list is displayed, Low literacy Latinas may be challenged in their ability to process the information contained in any individual article from that list. OBJECTIVE The objective of this observational study is to explore and describe the search behaviors of Latina breast cancer survivors and their caregivers. We explore their behaviors with different modalities of querying (voice/text), as well as other factors that present difficulties when searching for, and processing health information online. METHODS We recruited 7 Latina breast cancer survivors, of which 3 brought their caregivers, totaling 10 women. We administered the Health LiTT health literacy test, a demographic survey, and a breast cancer knowledge assessment to each participant. Next, we trained the participants on searching online with either a keyboard or voice. Then, we asked participants to find information about (a) maintaining good spirits after breast cancer; (b) affordability of breast cancer treatment; (c) general information about breast cancer and treatment options; and (d) any lingering issues they had around survivorship. Participants were allowed to search in English and/or Spanish. We video and audio recorded the computer activity of each participant/patient-caregiver (dyad) and coded it for search behaviors. RESULTS Consistent with prior research, we found web articles to be written for a grade level of 11.33 in English and 7.15 in Spanish. We also found that, although most of our participants preferred searching using speech, they struggled with this modality. Speech based search brought up new problems such as incomplete search queries, as the computer considered pauses as an indication of the end of a query. At other times, the participants made side comments, or the computer was still reading results when a new search was started; those comments were then, taken to be part of the search. We also found that participants formulated a query that was very general with the hope that the results would yield useful information about a more specific topic they had in mind. Also, in several occasions participants took notes based on information from the snippets on the result lists, without clicking on any results to read more. Lastly, participants that spent more time reviewing articles were those that scored higher in the health literacy test. CONCLUSIONS Despite the problems of searching using speech, we found a preference for this search modality, which may indicate a need to compensate for potential misspellings and grammatical errors that could appear in written queries. We also found the use of general questions in the hopes that detailed answers will provide information about more specific concerns. Understanding search behaviors and information evaluation strategies of low literacy Latina breast cancer survivors is fundamental for designing useful search interfaces for them to find relevant and reliable information online.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Iacobelli ◽  
Ginger Dragon ◽  
Giselle Mazur ◽  
Judy Guitelman

BACKGROUND Internet searching has become an increasingly useful tool for seeking health information. However, it is largely textual in nature and written for high literacy populations. Therefore, low literacy and low health literacy Latinas are at a disadvantage in terms of searching online as well as processing online resources. Internet searching presents a problem, as low literacy populations tend to make mistakes while typing, ending up with misleading results lists. In addition, even if an appropriate result list is displayed, Low literacy Latinas may be challenged in their ability to process the information contained in any individual article from that list. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to explore and describe the search behaviors of Latina breast cancer survivors and their caregivers. We explore their preferences in the modality of the query (voice/text), as well as other factors that present difficulties when searching for, and processing health information online. METHODS We recruited 7 Latina breast cancer survivors, of which 3 brought their caregivers, totaling 10 women. We administered the HLiTT health literacy test, a demographic survey, and a breast cancer knowledge assessment to each participant. Next, we trained the participants on searching online with either a keyboard or voice. Then, we asked participants to find information about (a) maintaining good spirits after breast cancer; (b) affordability of breast cancer treatment; (c) general information about breast cancer and treatment options; and (d) any lingering issues they had around survivorship. Participants were allowed to search in English and/or Spanish. We video and audio recorded the computer activity of each participant/patient-caregiver (dyad) and coded it for search behaviors. RESULTS We found that there was a significant positive correlation between participants’ HLiTT scores, and the time spent on articles (R=0.78, P=0.04). We also found a strong, but non-significant correlation between highest educational level and reading aloud (R=-0.75, P=0.089). We also found a similar correlation between HLiTT scores and the ratio of time spent perusing results vs. reading individual articles (R=-0.64, P=0.12), indicating that higher HLiTT scorers spent more of their time with individual articles, while lower HLiTT scorers spent more time perusing result lists. We also found that on average, participants attempted 6 spoken searches (SD: 4.32) and only 2.8 written searches (SD: 3.48). However, in debriefing interviews they stated a preference for voice searches. CONCLUSIONS Health literacy, more so than educational level attained, may be highly correlated with an individual’s ability to consume health information. Low health literacy individuals were more inclined to browse result lists instead of selecting or reading an individual article. We found a preference for voice searching, which may indicate a need to compensate for potential written misspellings and grammatical errors that could appear in written queries. We also found that many low literacy patients read aloud to better understand content. Understanding search behaviors and information evaluation strategies of low literacy Latina breast cancer survivors is fundamental for designing useful interfaces for them to find relevant and reliable information online. CLINICALTRIAL N/A


2021 ◽  
pp. 104365962098877
Author(s):  
Carolee Polek ◽  
Thomas Hardie ◽  
Janet A. Deatrick

Introduction Despite expanding interest in cancer survivorship, little is known about urban Asian breast cancer survivors whose experience may differ from those in suburban and rural locations. This study explores survivors’ challenges to maximize outcomes and identify common and unique themes among urban Asian survivors. Information was obtained from the survivors and outreach workers from their community. Methodology Descriptive qualitative methods including semistructured interview guides were used to plan, conduct, and analyze both individual interviews of Asian women ( n = 6) and a focus group ( n = 7) composed of community outreach workers. Results The interview and focus group findings, endorsed themes of communication/language, trust, and privacy, with generational differences. Poor health literacy in both survivors and providers was identified. Discussion Nurses are in a unique position to use the themes identified to both assist survivors expand their health literacy and lobby for resources for providers to promote culturally congruent care.


Author(s):  
Zoe Moon ◽  
Mira Zuchowski ◽  
Rona Moss-Morris ◽  
Myra S. Hunter ◽  
Sam Norton ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The number of e-health interventions developed for breast cancer survivors continues to increase. However, issues with engagement and retention are common. This study aimed to explore e-health literacy rates and access to smartphones and tablets in a large sample of breast cancer survivors. Methods In study 1, women were recruited from outpatient breast clinics across England and Wales. Eligible women were asked to complete a questionnaire pack to assess their access to devices and their e-health literacy. Multiple regression analyses were run to assess the relationship between technology access and e-health literacy with sociodemographic variables such as age, social deprivation, and education. Study 2 presents a smaller sample recruited through social media who answered a questionnaire relating to use of mobile devices and e-health, and apps. Results Two thousand nine women participated in the study. Seventy-one percent had access to a smartphone, 54% had access to a tablet, and 20% did not have access to either device. Multiple logistic regressions showed that women who were younger, had higher levels of education, and who were from less deprived areas were more likely to have access to either device. Poorer e-health literacy was associated with being older, having less education, and not having access to a mobile device. Conclusions Whilst the results show relatively widespread access to mobile devices, there is evidence of a digital divide across some groups. Online interventions should be developed with consideration of individuals who are less e-health-literate and less technologically adept in order to increase the likelihood of engagement.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 75-75
Author(s):  
Katharine Yao ◽  
Kristen Wroblewski ◽  
Martha Van Haitsma ◽  
Sarah Rabbitt ◽  
Jordan Williams ◽  
...  

75 Background: The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has increased but little is known about the sources of information women utilize to choose CPM. Methods: A 55-item survey validated with breast cancer survivors was administered to 136 patients before surgery from two institutions. Results: The median age was 58 years (range 30-85). Eighty-three (69.2%) were White. Seventy-five (58.6%) had a lumpectomy, 41 (32%) a unilateral mastectomy and 12 (9.4%) had a CPM. About 80% of women felt the information they were given about breast cancer treatment was consistent. Fifty-five patients (41.7%) sought out extra information beyond what the doctor gave them. Information with the strongest influence was websites, books recommended by their doctor (44%) and websites, books not recommended by their doctor (30.4%) was the second strongest influence. Women ranked their doctor’s spoken advice as the most important source of information (74.3%) compared to advice from individuals outside of medicine, online information, observing breast cancer survivors and advice from friends/family. Plastic surgeons and the spouse/partner had more influence on those <50 years old compared to >50 years old (p=0.03). When asked which individual outside of medicine influenced their decision, women chose breast cancer survivors as their top choice compared to their spouse/partner, church leaders and friends/relatives. However, 82 women (62.6%) stated that information provided by staff did not include any information about removing the healthy breast. Forty-one (36%) stated that no one discussed contralateral breast cancer risk and 67 (59%) stated that no one talked with them about the possibility that cancer could turn up somewhere else even if both breasts were removed. Conclusions: Women do not always receive information about CPM from their doctors but they still highly value their doctor’s advice. These findings highlight an opportunity for physicians to educate women about the utility of CPM as part of their surgical treatment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 94-94
Author(s):  
Vanessa Sheppard ◽  
Ling Zheng ◽  
Kristi D Graves ◽  
Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza ◽  
Mahlet Tadasse

94 Background: Finding unique cancer therapies based on the specific genomic profiles of a person’s tumor is a national priority. Precision medicine can reduce disparate outcomes – particularly among Black breast cancer survivors who have higher mortality rates. Black women tend to be underrepresented in genomic research. Methods: Hormone receptive positive breast cancer survivors (Whites = 334, Blacks = 124, Other = 23) were recruited via hospitals and outreach. Data were collected via telephone interviews to assess sociocultural and health care processes; clinical data were abstracted from charts. Cell pellets were harvested from mouthwashes by centrifugation, followed by washing with PBS solution twice. After the baseline, women had a brief telephone information session. Low literacy materials explaining biospecimen collection were mailed. The primary outcome was receipt of the biospecimen sample in three months. Logistic regression assessed factors associated with biospecimens receipt. Results: Most (69%) survivors provided biospecimens. Most (92.8%) samples had good size cell pellets. Most (93%) of the mouth wash samples will have sufficient DNA for genotyping assays. In bivariate analysis, race, education, and mistrust were not associated with biospecimen receipt (p> .05). Survivors more likely to provide biospecimens had higher ratings of: confidence in physicians’ technical skills, communication with providers, satisfaction with time with providers, and overall satisfaction with care (p< .05). Health literacy and functional well-being were also associated with biospecimen receipt. In multivariate models, only survivor’s ratings of their level of confidence in her oncologists’ technical skills remained significant (OR: 1.6 per 1 point increase; CI: 1.1, 2.5). Conclusions: Regardless of race, most breast cancer survivors are willing to provide biospecimens for genomics research. Brief informational sessions and simple low-literacy materials may enhance participation. Relationships with oncologists are salient to promoting survivors participation in genomics research.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1971-1978 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Casellas-Grau ◽  
E.C. Sumalla ◽  
M. Lleras ◽  
J. Vives ◽  
A. Sirgo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Beverley Lim Høeg ◽  
Marie Hoffmann Frederiksen ◽  
Elisabeth Anne Wreford Andersen ◽  
Lena Saltbæk ◽  
Anne Sofie Friberg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document