scholarly journals Mental health specialist video consultations versus treatment-as-usual for patients with depression or anxiety disorders in primary care: A randomized controlled feasibility trial (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justus Tönnies ◽  
Mechthild Hartmann ◽  
Michel Wensing ◽  
Joachim Szecsenyi ◽  
Frank Peters-Klimm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Anxiety Disorder ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Mental Health Specialist ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Health Specialist

BACKGROUND Most people suffering from depression and anxiety disorders are solely treated by their primary care physician. Access to specialized mental health care is impeded by patients’ comorbidity and immobility in ageing societies and long waiting times on the providers’ end. Video-based integrated care models may leverage limited resources more efficiently and provide timely specialized care in the primary care environment the patient is already familiar with. OBJECTIVE In an individually randomized controlled trial we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of mental health specialist video consultations with primary care patients with depression and/or anxiety disorder. METHODS Participants were recruited by their primary care physicians during regular practice visits. Eligible patients were required to experience at least moderate symptoms of depression and/or anxiety disorder. Patients were randomized in two groups receiving either treatment as usual as provided by their general practitioner or up to five video consultations conducted by a mental health specialist. Video consultations focused on (1) systematic diagnosis plus proactive monitoring using validated clinical rating scales, (2) the establishment of an effective working alliance and (3) a stepped-care algorithm within integrated care adjusting treatments based on clinical outcomes. Feasibility outcomes were recruitment, rate of loss to follow-up, acceptability of treatment and attendance at sessions. Effectiveness outcomes included depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), burden of specific somatic complaints (Somatic Symptom Disorder-B Criteria Scale, SSD-12), recovery (Recovery Assessment Scale, RAS-G), and perception of chronic illness care (Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care, PACIC–Short Form) – which were measured at baseline and 16 weeks post-allocation by assessors blinded to group allocation. RESULTS Fifty patients with depression and/or anxiety disorder were randomized, 23 to the intervention group and 27 to the treatment-as-usual group. The recruitment yield (number randomized per number screened) and consent rate (number randomized per number eligible) were 50/73 (68.5%) and 50/58 (86.2%), respectively. Concerning acceptability, 20 (87.0%) of the 23 in the intervention group completed the intervention. Of 108 planned video consultations, 102 (94.4%) were delivered. Follow-up rates were 95.7% and 85.2% for the intervention and the control group, respectively. Change from baseline scores at post-measurement for the “No Domination by Symptoms” domain of recovery (RAS-G) were somewhat higher for the intervention group compared to the control group (Mann-Whitney U-Test: rank-biserial r = 0.19 [-0.09; 0.46], P = .18). We did not detect any notable differences between the intervention group and the control group for the other effectiveness outcomes. We did not observe any serious adverse events related to the trial. CONCLUSIONS The intervention and study procedures are feasible for patients, primary care practice staff, and mental health specialists. A sufficiently powered pragmatic trial on mental health specialist video consultations should be conducted to investigate effectiveness in routine care. CLINICALTRIAL German Clinical Trials Register (registration no. DRKS00015812).

scholarly journals Effectiveness of an Internet- and App-Based Intervention for College Students With Elevated Stress: Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Harrer ◽  
Sophia Helen Adam ◽  
Rebecca Jessica Fleischmann ◽  
Harald Baumeister ◽  
Randy Auerbach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
College Students ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Waitlist Control ◽  
Symptoms Of Depression ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Waitlist Control Group

BACKGROUND Mental health problems are highly prevalent among college students. Most students with poor mental health, however, do not receive professional help. Internet-based self-help formats may increase the utilization of treatment. OBJECTIVE The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of an internet-based, app-supported stress management intervention for college students. METHODS College students (n=150) with elevated levels of stress (Perceived Stress Scale 4-item version, PSS-4 ≥8) were randomly assigned to either an internet- and mobile-based stress intervention group with feedback on demand or a waitlist control group. Self-report data were assessed at baseline, posttreatment (7 weeks), and 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was perceived stress posttreatment (PSS-4). Secondary outcomes included mental health outcomes, modifiable risk and protective factors, and college-related outcomes. Subgroup analyses were conducted in students with clinically relevant symptoms of depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies’ Depression Scale >17). RESULTS A total of 106 participants (76.8%) indicated that they were first-time help-seekers, and 77.3% (intervention group: 58/75; waitlist control group: 58/75) showed clinically relevant depressive symptoms at baseline. Findings indicated significant effects of the intervention compared with the waitlist control group for stress (d=0.69; 95% CI 0.36-1.02), anxiety (d=0.76; 95% CI 0.43-1.09), depression (d=0.63; 95% CI 0.30-0.96), college-related productivity (d=0.33; 95% CI 0.01-0.65), academic work impairment (d=0.34; 95% CI 0.01-0.66), and other outcomes after 7 weeks (posttreatment). Response rates for stress symptoms were significantly higher for the intervention group (69%, 52/75) compared with the waitlist control group (35%, 26/75, P<.001; number needed to treat=2.89, 95% CI 2.01-5.08) at posttest (7 weeks). Effects were sustained at 3-month follow-up, and similar findings emerged in students with symptoms of depression. CONCLUSIONS Internet- and mobile-based interventions could be an effective and cost-effective approach to reduce consequences of college-related stress and might potentially attract students with clinically relevant depression who would not otherwise seek help. CLINICALTRIAL German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00010212; http://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do? navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00010212 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6w55Ewhjd)

Mental health specialist video consultations versus treatment as usual in patients with depression or anxiety disorders in primary care: study protocol for an individually randomised superiority trial (the PROVIDE-C trial)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus W. Haun ◽  
Justus Tönnies ◽  
Regina Brinster ◽  
Dorothea Weber ◽  
Michel Wensing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Specialist Care ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Mental Health Specialist ◽  
Health Specialist ◽  
Superiority Trial ◽  
Versus Treatment

Abstract Background: The majority of people with mental disorders, including those with severe and chronic disorders, are treated solely by their general practitioner (GP). Nevertheless, specialised mental health care may be required for specific patients. Notably, the accessibility of mental health specialist care is mainly complicated by (a) long waiting times for an appointment with specialists, (b) long travel distances to specialists, particularly in rural and remote areas and (c) patients’ reservations about mental health specialist care (including fear of being stigmatised by seeking such care). To mitigate those barriers, technology-based integrated care models have been proposed. The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a mental health specialist video consultations model versus treatment as usual in patients with depression or anxiety disorders in primary care. Methods: In an individually randomised, prospective, two-arm superiority trial with parallel group design, N = 320 patients with anxiety and/or depressive disorder will be recruited in general practices. The intervention includes a newly developed treatment model based on video consultations with focus on diagnostics, treatment planning, and short-term intervention by mental health specialists. We will systematically compare the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and adverse effects of this new model with usual care by the GP: The primary outcome is the absolute change in the mean depressive and anxiety symptom severity measured on the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS) from baseline to 6 months after baseline assessment. Follow-up in both groups will be conducted by blinded outcome assessors at 6 months and 12 months after baseline. The main analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat principle. We will optimise the likelihood of treatment effectiveness by strict inclusion criteria for patients, enhanced intervention integrity, and conducting a process evaluation. Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first confirmatory study on a video-based, integrated care model for the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders in GP patients in Germany. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, United States National Institutes of Health (NCT04316572, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04316572). Prospectively registered on 20 March 2020.

scholarly journals A Mobile Health Intervention for Mental Health Promotion Among University Students: Randomized Controlled Trial

10.2196/17208 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e17208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Bendtsen ◽  
Ulrika Müssener ◽  
Catharina Linderoth ◽  
Kristin Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
University Students ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Positive Mental Health ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Depression And Anxiety ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background High positive mental health, including the ability to cope with the normal stresses of life, work productively, and be able to contribute to one’s community, has been associated with various health outcomes. The role of positive mental health is therefore increasingly recognized in national mental health promotion programs and policies. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions could be a cost-effective way to disseminate positive psychological interventions to the general population. Objective The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of a fully automated mHealth intervention on positive mental health, and anxiety and depression symptomology among Swedish university students using a randomized controlled trial design. Methods A 2-arm, single-blind (researchers), parallel-groups randomized controlled trial with an mHealth positive psychology program intervention group and a relevant online mental health information control group was employed to estimate the effect of the novel intervention. Participants were recruited using digital advertising through student health care centers in Sweden. Inclusion criteria were (1) university students, (2) able to read and understand Swedish, (3) and have access to a mobile phone. Exclusion criteria were high positive mental health, as assessed by the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF), or high depression and anxiety symptomology, as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS). The primary outcome was positive mental health (MHC-SF), and the secondary outcomes were depression and anxiety symptomatology (HADS). The subscales of MHC-SF were also analyzed as exploratory outcomes. Outcomes were measured 3 months after randomization through questionnaires completed on the participants’ mobile phones. Results A total of 654 participants (median age 25 years), including 510 (78.0%) identifying as female, were randomized to either the intervention (n=348) or control group (n=306). At follow-up, positive mental health was significantly higher in the intervention group compared with the control group (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.067, 95% CI 1.024-1.112, P=.002). For both depression and anxiety symptomatology, the intervention group showed significantly lower scores at follow-up compared with the control group (depression: IRR=0.820, 95% CI 0.714-0.942, P=.005; anxiety: IRR=0.899, 95% CI 0.840-0.962, P=.002). Follow-up rates were lower than expected (58.3% for primary outcomes and 52.3% for secondary outcomes); however, attrition analyses did not identify any systematic attrition with respect to baseline variables. Conclusions The mHealth intervention was estimated to be superior to usual care in increasing positive mental health among university students. A protective effect of the intervention was also found on depressive and anxiety symptoms. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of using an automated mobile phone format to enhance positive mental health, which offers promise for the use of mHealth solutions in public mental health promotion. Trial Registration International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Registry ISRCTN54748632; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN54748632

scholarly journals Does Kinesiophobia Modify the Effects of Physical Therapy on Outcomes in Patients With Sciatica in Primary Care? Subgroup Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (9) ◽  
pp. 1217-1223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemieke J.H. Verwoerd ◽  
Pim A.J. Luijsterburg ◽  
Bart W. Koes ◽  
Abdelilah el Barzouhi ◽  
Arianne P. Verhagen
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Fear Of Movement

BackgroundA higher level of kinesiophobia appears to be associated with poor recovery in patients with sciatica.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate whether kinesiophobia modifies the effect of physical therapy on outcomes in patients with sciatica.DesignThis was a subgroup analysis from a randomized controlled trial.SettingThe study was conducted in a primary care setting.PatientsA total of 135 patients with acute sciatica participated.InterventionPatients were randomly assigned to groups that received (1) physical therapy plus general practitioners' care (intervention group) or (2) general practitioners' care alone (control group).MeasurementsKinesiophobia at baseline was measured with the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) and a single substitute question for kinesiophobia (SQK). Pain and recovery were assessed at 3- and 12-month follow-ups. Regression analysis was used to test for interaction between the level of kinesiophobia at baseline and treatment allocation. Subgroup results were calculated for patients classified with high fear of movement and for those classified with low fear of movement.ResultsKinesiophobia at baseline interacted with physical therapy in the analysis with leg pain intensity at 12-month follow-up. Kinesiophobia at baseline did not interact with physical therapy regarding any outcome at 3-month follow-up or recovery at 12-month follow-up. When comparing both treatment groups in the subgroup of patients with high fear of movement (n=73), the only significant result was found for leg pain intensity difference from baseline at 12-month follow-up (intervention group: X̅=−5.0, SD=2.6; control group: X̅=−3.6, SD=2.7).LimitationsThe post hoc study design and relatively small sample size were limitations of the study.ConclusionsIn 135 patients with sciatica, evidence shows that patients with a higher level of kinesiophobia at baseline may particularly benefit from physical therapy with regard to decreasing leg pain intensity at 12-month follow-up.

scholarly journals Short-term balance training and acute effects on postural sway in balance-deficient older adults: a randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Niklas Sörlén ◽  
Andreas Hult ◽  
Peter Nordström ◽  
Anna Nordström ◽  
Jonas Johansson
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Postural Sway ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Eyes Closed ◽  
Balance Exercise

Abstract Background We aimed to determine the effectiveness of 4 weeks of balance exercise compared with no intervention on objectively measured postural sway. Methods This was a single-center parallel randomized controlled, open label, trial. A six-sided dice was used for allocation at a 1:1-ratio between exercise and control. The trial was performed at a university hospital clinic in Sweden and recruited community-dwelling older adults with documented postural instability. The intervention consisted of progressively challenging balance exercise three times per week, during 4 weeks, with follow-up at week five. Main outcome measures were objective postural sway length during eyes open and eyes closed conditions. Results Sixty-five participants aged 70 years (balance exercise n = 32; no intervention n = 33) were randomized. 14 participants were excluded from analysis because of early dropout before follow-up at week five, leaving 51 (n = 22; n = 29) participants for analysis. No significant differences were detected between the groups in any of the postural sway outcomes. Within-group analyses showed significant improvements in hand grip strength for the intervention group, while Timed Up & Go improvements were comparable between groups but only statistically significant in the control group. Conclusions Performing balance exercise over a four-week intervention period did not acutely improve postural sway in balance-deficient older adults. The lower limit in duration and frequency to achieve positive effects remains unclear. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT03227666, July 24, 2017, retrospectively registered.

scholarly journals Effect of physician prescribed information on hospital readmission and death after discharge among patients with health failure: A randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 146045822199640
Author(s):  
Faranak Kazemi Majd ◽  
Vahideh Zarea Gavgani ◽  
Ali Golmohammadi ◽  
Ali Jafari-Khounigh
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Oral Information

In order to understand if a physician prescribed medical information changes, the number of hospital readmission, and death among the heart failure patients. A 12-month randomized controlled trial was conducted (December 2013–2014). Totally, 120 patients were randomly allocated into two groups of intervention ( n = 60) and control ( n = 60). Accordingly, the control group was given the routine oral information by the nurse or physician, and the intervention group received the Information Prescription (IP) prescribed by the physician as well as the routine oral information. The data was collected via telephone interviews with the follow-up intervals of 6 and 12 months, and also for 1 year after the discharge. The patients with the median age of (IQR) 69.5 years old (19.8) death upon adjusting a Cox survival model, [RR = 0.67, 95%CI: 0.46–0.97]. Few patients died during 1 year in the intervention group compared to the controls (7 vs 15) [RR = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.20–1.06]. During a period of 6-month follow-up there was not statistically significant on death and readmission between two groups. Physician prescribed information was clinically and statistically effective on the reduction of death and hospital readmission rates among the HF patients in long term follow-up.

Effect of ICT-Based Self-Management System DialBeticsLite on Treating Abdominal Obesity: Randomized Controlled Trial. (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Kondo ◽  
Teru Okitsu ◽  
Kayo Waki ◽  
Toshimasa Yamauchi ◽  
Masaomi Nangaku ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Obesity ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Metabolic Parameters ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Physical Parameters ◽  
Lifestyle Behavior ◽  
Randomized Controlled

BACKGROUND Mobile health interventions, a more cost-effective approach compared to traditional methods of delivering lifestyle coaching in person, have been shown to improve physical parameters and lifestyle behavior among overweight populations. It is useful to know the efficacy of mobile apps in treating abdominal obesity, as it is a known risk factor for metabolic disorders and type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine whether a mobile self-management app (DialBeticsLite) could be used by patients with abdominal obesity to achieve a reduction in visceral fat area (VFA) and other physical parameters. METHODS This study was an open-label, 2-arm parallel-design randomized controlled trial. We recruited 122 people in September 2017, and randomly assigned them into either the intervention group or the control group. All participants attended an educational group session, which delivered information regarding diet and exercise. Additionally, participants in the intervention group were asked to use DialBeticsLite for 3 months. DialBeticsLite facilitated the daily recording of several physical parameters and lifestyle behavior, and provided feedback to encourage an improvement in behavior. The primary outcome was the change in VFA from baseline to the 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included changes in both physical and metabolic parameters, from baseline to the 3-month follow-up. Welch t test was conducted to analyze the effects of DialBeticsLite on both the primary outcome and the secondary outcomes. RESULTS Out of the 122 participants recruited, 75 participants were analyzed due to 47 participants being excluded: 37 due to ineligibility and 10 due to withdrawal of consent. The mean age was 49.3 (standard deviation: SD 6.1) in the intervention group (n=41) and 48.5 (SD 5.3) in the control group (n=34), and all participants were male, though unintentionally. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the intervention and control group, except for VFA. The averaged change of VFA was -23.5cm2 (SD 20.6) in the intervention group and +1.9cm2 (SD 16.2) in the control group (P<.001). Statistically significant differences were also found for the change of body weight, BMI and waist circumference. These findings did not change after adjusting for VFA at baseline. The intervention had no significant effect on any of the metabolic parameters. An exploratory analysis showed significant associations between the change in VFA and steps per day, and between the change in VFA and calorie intake per day within the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that although unsuccessful in improving metabolic parameters, a mobile health intervention facilitating the daily monitoring of several physical parameters and lifestyle behavior, can be highly effective in inducing visceral fat loss and weight loss among adults with abdominal obesity. CLINICALTRIAL Trial Registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) UMIN000042045 Retrospectively Registered; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr.cgi?function=brows&action=brows&recptno=R000046495&type=summary&llanguag=J

Effect of psychoeducation website named “Imacoco-care” on improving psychological distress among workers under COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized controlled trial (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kotaro Imamura ◽  
Natsu Sasaki ◽  
Yuki Sekiya ◽  
Kazuhiro Watanabe ◽  
Asuka Sakuraya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Adverse Effect ◽  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Psychoeducational Intervention ◽  
Favorable Effect ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Small Effect Size

BACKGROUND The prolonged coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected mental health among workers. Psychoeducational intervention via an Internet website could be effective for primary prevention of mental health among workers in the current COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to examine the effect of a newly developed online psychoeducational website named "Imacoco-care" on reducing psychological distress and fear about COVID-19 infection among workers. METHODS Participants in the present study were recruited from registered members of a web survey company in Japan. Participants who fulfilled the eligibility criteria were randomly allocated to intervention or control groups. Participants in the intervention group were invited to access the Imacoco-care within a month after the baseline survey. Kessler’s Psychological Distress Scale (K6) and The Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) were obtained at baseline, 1-, and 3-month follow-ups. RESULTS A total of 1200 workers were randomly allocated to an intervention or control group (n = 600 for each). In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses, the Imacoco-care showed significant favorable effect on K6 (p = 0.03) with small effect size (d = -0.14), and adverse effect on FCV-19S (p = 0.01) with small effect size (d = 0.16) in the intervention group at 3-month follow-up. In the per-protocol analyses (only included participants who have read the Imacoco-care at least one time), the Imacoco-care also showed significant favorable effect on reducing K6 (p = 0.03), while adverse effect on FCV-19S was not significant (p = 0.06) in the intervention group at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS A web-based psychoeducation approach may be effective on improving psychological distress in a general working population, while it may be important not only distributing information but also encouraging to access and see the contents to prevent the adverse effect of psychoeducational intervention. CLINICALTRIAL The University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR). The registration number is UMIN000042556 (https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000048548).

Reflective testing – A randomized controlled trial in primary care patients

2020 ◽  
pp. 000456322096837
Author(s):  
Wytze P Oosterhuis ◽  
Wilhelmine PHG Verboeket-van de Venne ◽  
Cees TBM van Deursen ◽  
Henri EJH Stoffers ◽  
Bernadette AC van Acker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Primary Care Patients

Background Reflective testing, i.e. interpreting, commenting on and, if necessary, adding tests in order to aid the diagnostic process in a meaningful and efficient manner, is an extra service provided by laboratory medicine. However, there have been no prospective randomized controlled trials investigating the value of reflective testing in patient management. Methods In this trial, primary care patients were randomly allocated to an intervention group, where general practitioners received laboratory tests results as requested as well as add-on test results with interpretative comments where considered appropriate by the laboratory specialist, or to a control group, where general practitioners only received the laboratory test results requested. Patients’ medical records were evaluated with a follow-up period of six months. For both groups, the primary outcome measures, i.e. both intended action and actual management action, were blindly assessed by an independent expert panel as adequate, neutral or inadequate. Results In 226 of the 270 cases (84%), reflective testing was considered to be useful for the patient. In the intervention group ( n = 148), actual management by the general practitioner was scored as adequate ( n = 104; 70%), neutral ( n = 29; 20%) or not adequate ( n = 15; 10%). In the control group ( n = 122), these numbers were 57 (47%), 37 (30%) and 28 (23%). This difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.001). Conclusion This randomized controlled trial showed a positive effect of reflective testing in primary care patients on the adequacy of their management, as documented in medical records.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document