Improved survival with remote monitoring in CRT-D recipients (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Bogyi ◽  
Mate Vamos ◽  
Zsolt Bari ◽  
Balazs Polgar ◽  
Balazs Muk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Functional Class ◽  
Heart Failure Management ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Tertiary Referral Centre ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Clinical Benefits ◽  
Remote Monitoring Systems

BACKGROUND Remote monitoring is an established, guideline-recommended technology with unequivocal clinical benefits; however, its ability to improve survival is contradictory. OBJECTIVE The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of remote monitoring on mortality in an optimally treated heart failure patient population undergoing CRT-D implantation in a large-volume tertiary referral centre. METHODS The population of this single-centre, retrospective, observational study included 231 consecutive patients receiving CRT-D devices in the Medical Centre of the Hungarian Defence Forces (Budapest, Hungary) from January 2011 to June 2016. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients on remote monitoring and on conventional follow-up. RESULTS The average follow-up time was 28.4 ± 18.1 months. Patients on remote monitoring suffered more likely from atrial fibrillation, received heart failure management at our dedicated heart failure outpatient clinic more often, and had a slightly lower NYHA functional class. Crude all-cause mortality of remote-monitored patients was significantly lower compared to patients followed conventionally (HR: 0.368, 95% CI: 0.186-0.727, p=0.004). The survival benefit remained statistically significant after adjustment for important baseline parameters (adjusted HR: 0.361, 95% CI: 0.181-0.722, p=0.004) CONCLUSIONS In this current single-centre, retrospective study of optimally treated heart failure patients undergoing CRT-D implantation, the use of remote monitoring systems was associated with significantly better survival.

Abstract 15225: Remote Monitoring Using Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators for Heart Failure Management in a European Cohort: A Meta-analysis

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fredrick M Ogugua ◽  
Abdulrahman Gamam ◽  
Basilio Addo ◽  
Kofi Osei
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Reference List ◽  
Heart Failure Management ◽  
Conventional Management ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators

Introduction: Remote monitoring (RM) using implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) is a rapidly emerging alternative modality in heart failure management. Studies involving US cohorts have shown promising results with RM. We aim to perform a meta-analysis assessing the clinical outcomes of RM versus conventional follow-up among heart failure (HF) patients with an ICD in a European cohort. Methods: Electronic database and reference list searches were conducted to identify European studies assessing patient outcomes when managed with RM using ICD versus conventional follow up. After a review of abstracts and selected full-text articles, we identified four randomized trials (RCT) for inclusion. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The primary outcome was the incidence of HF hospitalization and the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality during the follow-up period. A random-effects model was used. All analysis was performed using Cochrane Revman version 5.3. Results: Four RCT’s were included, with a total of 4504 participants. Mean follow-up time was 22 months. Rate of HF hospitalization with RM was 678 versus 680 with conventional management (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.10, p = 0.75). All-cause mortality with RM was 252 versus 284 with conventional management (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.03, p =0.11). Conclusions: Our study found that in a European cohort, there was no difference in the incidence of HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality among patients managed with RM using ICD and those managed with conventional care. Further research is required to assess the feasibility and generalizability of HF management using ICD’s in different patient populations.

Abstract P029: Is Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (NICM) Associated With Better Prognosis Than Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (ICM) in Heart Failure Patients?

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepakraj Gajanana ◽  
Abel Romero-Corral ◽  
Mahek Shah ◽  
Parichart Junpapart ◽  
Vincent M Figueredo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Heart Failure Management ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Background: Past data suggest ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is associated with worse prognosis when compared to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy(NICM). With advances in heart failure management, this relationship deserves a fresh look. We hypothesize that all cause mortality from NICM is lower when compared to ICM over five year period. Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive heart failure patients with left ventricular ejection fraction(EF) less than 35% admitted to Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia between 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007. Data pertaining to patient demographics and clinical characteristics were obtained. All cause mortality was obtained at 5 years using hazard ratio to account for time to event. Results: The final cohort consisted of 360 patients of which 63%(224 of 360) had NICM. Mean age was 61±16 years for NICM and 66±11 yrs for ICM. African Americans constituted 83%(185 of 224) of NICM and 59%(80 of 136) of ICM. The clinical characteristics are as shown in the table. There were 160 deaths over the follow up period. Age, CKD, dyslipidemia and EF were significant predictors of mortality. ICM cohort had 81 deaths out of 136(60%) as compared to 85 out of 185((39%) in NICM over the follow up period. However, when adjusted for age, DM, CKD and days of follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the two groups over the five year follow up period. Conclusions: In this study, there was no significant mortality difference between ICM and NICM. We also found that despite advances in heart failure management in the last two decades, in clinical practice they are under-utilized.

scholarly journals Automatic daily remote monitoring in heart failure patients implanted with a cardiac resynchronisation therapy-defibrillator: a single-centre observational pilot study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Ezer ◽  
Nelli Farkas ◽  
Istvan Szokodi ◽  
Attila Kónyi
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy ◽  
Office Visits ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Death Event ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation ◽  
Resynchronisation Therapy ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionThe impact of remote monitoring (RM) on clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with cardiac resynchronisation therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation is controversial. This study sought to evaluate the performance of an RM follow-up protocol using modified criteria of the PARTNERS HF trial in comparison with a conventional follow-up scheme.Material and methodsWe compared cardiovascular (CV) mortality (primary endpoint) and hospitalisation events for decompensated HF, and the number of ambulatory in-office visits (secondary endpoint) in CRT-D implanted patients with automatic RM utilising daily transmissions (RM group, n = 45) and conventional follow-up (CFU group, n = 43) in a single-centre observational study.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 25 months, a significant advantage was seen in the RM group in terms of CV mortality (1 vs. 6 death event, p = 0.04), although RM follow-up was not an independent predictor for CV mortality (HR = 0.882; 95% CI: 0.25–3.09; p = 0.845). Patient CV mortality was independently influenced by hospitalisation events for decompensated HF (HR = 3.24; 95% CI: 8–84; p = 0.022) during follow-up. We observed significantly fewer hospitalisation events for decompensated HF (8 vs. 29 events, p = 0.046) in the RM group. Furthermore, a decreased number of total (161 vs. 263, p < 0.01) and unnecessary ambulatory in-office visits (6 vs.19, p = 0.012) were seen in the RM group as compared to the CFU group.ConclusionsFollow-up of CRT-D patients using automatic RM with daily transmissions based on modified PARTNERS HF criteria enabled more effective ambulatory interventions leading indirectly to improved CV survival. Moreover, RM directly decreased the number of HF hospitalizations and ambulatory follow-up burden compared to CRT-D patients with conventional follow-up.

scholarly journals New foundational therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: should we keep following the 2016 European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Guideline in 2021?

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Brito ◽  
J.R Agostinho ◽  
S Pereira ◽  
P Silverio-Antonio ◽  
P Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Sequential Therapy ◽  
Functional Class ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Nyha Functional Class ◽  
Therapy Initiation ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
European Society Of Cardiology

Abstract Introduction The 2016 European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Guidelines (2016 HF GL) suggest sequential therapy initiation with angiotensinogen converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blocker (BB) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Since their publication, major trials established the benefit of sacubitril/valsartan (ARNi) and SGLT2 in HFrEF, and ARNi are suggested to replace ACEi/ARB as first line therapy. So, with HFrEF foundational therapy evolvement, the 2016 HF GL sequential therapy initiation algorithm has been raised into question. Purpose To compare in the real-world practice, the effect on all-cause mortality of the simultaneous use of every pharmacological class currently included in the HFrEF foundational therapy with conventional sequential therapy. Methods A population of consecutive patients (pts) included in a post-discharge structured follow-up programin in a tertiary center was analyzed. Two groups were defined: 1) patients medicated with all pharmacological classes considered the HFrEF foundational therapy (ARNi, BB, MRA and SGLT2 inhibitor), independently of the dosages – “FT group”; 2) patients medicated with ACEi/ARB, BB and MRA on maximal tolerated doses – “2016 HF GL group”. Pts under other therapeutical combinations were excluded. The study groups were compared with Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests. Impact on all-cause mortality was established with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression after adjustment for age, sex and baseline creatinine, NYHA functional class and LVEF. Results From 2016 to February 2021, a total of 101 pts with HFrEF were included and followed for 25±16 months. 54 pts were included in the FT group and 47 in the 2016 HF GL. The study population (69.3% males, 64.6±11.4 years) were mainly in NYHA functional class II (48%) and III (48%). The most common HF aethiologies were ischemic heart disease (49.5%) and dilated cardiomyopathy (30.7%), median LVEF was 26% and 22% were under CRT. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for diabetes (more common in FT group, 70 vs 22%, p&lt;0.001). All-cause mortality rate during follow-up was significantly different between two groups: 1.9% in FT group and 17% in the HF GL group (p: 0.047) – Figure 1. The implementation of all foundational therapy classes was an independent protective factor for all-cause mortality (HR 0.41; IQR 0.004–0.468; P: 0.010) in multivariate Cox regression. Conclusion This real-world study suggests that conventional sequential therapy suggested by the 2016 HF GL may be less effective on reducing all-cause mortality in HFrEF than simultaneous use of all pharmacological classes that nowadays compose the foundation therapy. These results support the hypothesis of promoting early introduction of all therapy classes followed by a tailored uptitration may be beneficial. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1

453-P: Metabolic Syndrome Severity Score, All-Cause Mortality, and Incident Vascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes: A 13-Year, Single-Centre, Follow-Up Study

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 453-P
Author(s):  
MONIA GAROFOLO ◽  
ELISA GUALDANI ◽  
DANIELA LUCCHESI ◽  
LAURA GIUSTI ◽  
VERONICA SANCHO-BORNEZ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
All Cause Mortality

scholarly journals POSTERS (2)96CONTINUOUS VERSUS INTERMITTENT MONITORING FOR DETECTION OF SUBCLINICAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS97HIGH DAY-TO-DAY INTRA-INDIVIDUAL REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE HEART RATE RESPONSE TO EXERCISE IN THE UK BIOBANK DATA98USE OF NOVEL GLOBAL ULTRASOUND IMAGING AND CONTINUEOUS DIPOLE DENSITY MAPPING TO GUIDE ABLATION IN MACRO-REENTRANT TACHYCARDIAS99ANTICOAGULATION AND THE RISK OF COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING VT AND PVC ABLATION100NON-SUSTAINED VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA FREQUENTLY PRECEDES CARDIAC ARREST IN PATIENTS WITH BRUGADA SYNDROME101USING HIGH PRECISION HAEMODYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS TO ASSESS DIFFERENCES IN AV OPTIMUM BETWEEN DIFFERENT LEFT VENTRICULAR LEAD POSITIONS IN BIVENTRICULAR PACING102CAN WE PREDICT MEDIUM TERM MORTALITY FROM TRANSVENOUS LEAD EXTRACTION PRE-OPERATIVELY?103PREVENTION OF UNECESSARY ADMISSIONS IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION104EPICARDIAL CATHETER ABLATION FOR VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA ON UNINTERRUPTED WARFARIN: A SAFE APPROACH?105HOW WELL DOES THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL EXCELLENCE (NICE) GUIDENCE ON TRANSIENT LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS (T-LoC) WORK IN A REAL WORLD? AN AUDIT OF THE SECOND STAGE SPECIALIST CARDIOVASCULAT ASSESSMENT AND DIAGNOSIS106DETECTION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN COMMUNITY LOCATIONS USING NOVEL TECHNOLOGY'S AS A METHOD OF STROKE PREVENTION IN THE OVER 65'S ASYMPTOMATIC POPULATION - SHOULD IT BECOME STANDARD PRACTISE?107HIGH-DOSE ISOPRENALINE INFUSION AS A METHOD OF INDUCTION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A MULTI-CENTRE, PLACEBO CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL IN PATIENTS WITH VARYING ARRHYTHMIC RISK108PACEMAKER COMPLICATIONS IN A DISTRICT GENERAL HOSPITAL109CARDIAC RESYNCHRONISATION THERAPY: A TRADE-OFF BETWEEN LEFT VENTRICULAR VOLTAGE OUTPUT AND EJECTION FRACTION?110RAPID DETERIORATION IN LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION AND ACUTE HEART FAILURE AFTER DUAL CHAMBER PACEMAKER INSERTION WITH RESOLUTION FOLLOWING BIVENTRICULAR PACING111LOCALLY PERSONALISED ATRIAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY MODELS FROM PENTARAY CATHETER MEASUREMENTS112EVALUATION OF SUBCUTANEOUS ICD VERSUS TRANSVENOUS ICD- A PROPENSITY MATCHED COST-EFFICACY ANALYSIS OF COMPLICATIONS & OUTCOMES113LOCALISING DRIVERS USING ORGANISATIONAL INDEX IN CONTACT MAPPING OF HUMAN PERSISTENT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION114RISK FACTORS FOR SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH IN PAEDIATRIC HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS115EFFECT OF CATHETER STABILITY AND CONTACT FORCE ON VISITAG DENSITY DURING PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION116HEPATIC CAPSULE ENHANCEMENT IS COMMONLY SEEN DURING MR-GUIDED ABLATION OF ATRIAL FLUTTER: A MECHANISTIC INSIGHT INTO PROCEDURAL PAIN117DOES HIGHER CONTACT FORCE IMPAIR LESION FORMATION AT THE CAVOTRICUSPID ISTHMUS? INSIGHTS FROM MR-GUIDED ABLATION OF ATRIAL FLUTTER118CLINICAL CHARACTERISATION OF A MALIGNANT SCN5A MUTATION IN CHILDHOOD119RADIOFREQUENCY ASSOCIATED VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION120CONTRACTILE RESERVE EXPRESSED AS SYSTOLIC VELOCITY DOES NOT PREDICT RESPONSE TO CRT121DAY-CASE DEVICES - A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY USING PATIENT CODING DATA122PATIENTS UNDERGOING SVT ABLATION HAVE A HIGH INCIDENCE OF SECONDARY ARRHYTHMIA ON FOLLOW UP: IMPLICATIONS FOR PRE-PROCEDURE COUNSELLING123PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF HAEMOGLOBINN AND RED BLOOD CELL DITRIBUTION WIDTH IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE UNDERGOING CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY124REMOTE MONITORING AND FOLLOW UP DEVICES125A 20-YEAR, SINGLE-CENTRE EXPERIENCE OF IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATORS (ICD) IN CHILDREN: TIME TO CONSIDER THE SUBCUTANEOUS ICD?126EXPERIENCE OF MAGNETIC REASONANCE IMAGING (MEI) IN PATIENTS WITH MRI CONDITIONAL DEVICES127THE SINUS BRADYCARDIA SEEN IN ATHLETES IS NOT CAUSED BY ENHANCED VAGAL TONE BUT INSTEAD REFLECTS INTRINSIC CHANGES IN THE SINUS NODE REVEALED BY I (F) BLOCKADE128SUCCESSFUL DAY-CASE PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION - AN EIGHT YEAR SINGLE-CENTRE EXPERIENCE129LEFT VENTRICULAR INDEX MASS ASSOCIATED WITH ESC HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY RISK SCORE IN PATIENTS WITH ICDs: A TERTIARY CENTRE HCM REGISTRY130A DGH EXPERIENCE OF DAY-CASE CARDIAC PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION131IS PRE-PROCEDURAL FASTING A NECESSITY FOR SAFE PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION?

EP Europace ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (suppl 2) ◽  
pp. ii36-ii47
Author(s):  
T. Philippsen ◽  
M. Orini ◽  
C.A. Martin ◽  
E. Volkova ◽  
J.O.M. Ormerod ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Day Case ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Subcutaneous Icd

External validation of a heart failure risk prediction model in a remote monitoring cohort submitted to cardiac resynchronization therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Cardoso ◽  
M Coutinho ◽  
G Portugal ◽  
A Valentim ◽  
A.S Delgado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
National Database ◽  
Failure Risk

Abstract Background Patients (P) submitted to cardiac ressynchronization therapy (CRT) are at high risk of heart failure (HF) events during follow-up. Continuous analysis of various physiological parameters, as reported by remote monitoring (RM), can contribute to point out incident HF admissions. Tailored evaluation, including multi-parameter modelling, may further increase the accuracy of such algorithms. Purpose Independent external validation of a commercially available algorithm (“Heart Failure Risk Status” HFRS, Medtronic, MN USA) in a cohort submitted to CRT implantation in a tertiary center. Methods Consecutive P submitted to CRT implantation between January 2013 and September 2019 who had regular RM transmissions were included. The HFRS algorithm includes OptiVol (Medtronic Plc., MN, USA), patient activity, night heart rate (NHR), heart rate variability (HRV), percentage of CRT pacing, atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation (AT/AF) burden, ventricular rate during AT/AF (VRAF), and detected arrhythmia episodes/therapy delivered. P were classified as low, medium or high risk. Hospital admissions were systematically assessed by use of a national database (“Plataforma de Dados de Saúde”). Accuracy of the HFRS algorithm was evaluated by random effects logistic regression for the outcome of unplanned hospital admission for HF in the 30 days following each transmission episode. Results 1108 transmissions of 35 CRT P, corresponding to 94 patient-years were assessed. Mean follow-up was 2.7 yrs. At implant, age was 67.6±9.8 yrs, left ventricular ejection fraction 28±7.8%, BNP 156.6±292.8 and NYHA class &gt;II in 46% of the P. Hospital admissions for HF were observed within 30 days in 9 transmissions. Stepwise increase in HFRS was significantly associated with higher risk of HF admission (odds ratio 12.7, CI 3.2–51.5). HFRS had good discrimination for HF events with receiving-operator curve AUC 0.812. Conclusions HFRS was significantly associated with incident HF admissions in a high-risk cohort. Prospective use of this algorithm may help guide HF therapy in CRT recipients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Long-term systolic blood pressure and all-cause mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an analysis of the TOPCAT trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Huang ◽  
C Liu
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background Lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) at admission or discharge was associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the optimal long-term SBP for HFpEF was less clear. Purpose To examine the association of long-term SBP and all-cause mortality among patients with HFpEF. Methods We analyzed participants from the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) study. Participants had at least two SBP measurements of different times during the follow-up were included. Long-term SBP was defined as the average of all SBP measurements during the follow-up. We stratified participants into four groups according to long-term SBP: &lt;120mmHg, ≥120mmHg and &lt;130mmHg, ≥130mmHg and &lt;140mmHg, ≥140mmHg. Multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all-cause mortality associated with SBP level. To assess for nonlinearity, we fitted restricted cubic spline models of long-term SBP. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by confining participants with history of hypertension or those with left ventricular ejection fraction≥50%. Results The 3338 participants had a mean (SD) age of 68.5 (9.6) years; 51.4% were women, and 89.3% were White. The median long-term SBP was 127.3 mmHg (IQR 121–134.2, range 77–180.7). Patients in the SBP of &lt;120mmHg group were older age, less often female, less often current smoker, had higher estimated glomerular filtration rate, less often had history of hypertension, and more often had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and atrial fibrillation. After multivariable adjustment, long-term SBP of 120–130mmHg and 130–140mmHg was associated with a lower risk of mortality during a mean follow-up of 3.3 years (HR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49–0.85, P=0.001; HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50–0.88, P=0.004, respectively); long-term SBP of &lt;120mmHg had similar risk of mortality (HR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.78–1.36, P=0.836), compared with long-term SBP of ≥140mmHg. Findings from restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrate that there was J-shaped association between long-term SBP and all-cause mortality (P=0.02). These association was essentially unchanged in sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Among patients with HFpEF, long-term SBP showed a J-shaped pattern with all-cause mortality and a range of 120–140 mmHg was significantly associated with better outcomes. Future randomized controlled trials need to evaluate optimal long-term SBP goal in patients with HFpEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant (2019M660229 and 2019TQ0380)

scholarly journals Prediction of all-cause mortality with malnutrition assessed by controlling nutritional status score in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Huiyang Li ◽  
Peng Zhou ◽  
Yikai Zhao ◽  
Huaichun Ni ◽  
Xinping Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Conut Score

Abstract Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the association between malnutrition assessed by the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score and all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Settings: A comprehensively literature search of PubMed and Embase databases was performed until 30 November 2020. Studies reporting the utility of CONUT score in prediction of all-cause mortality among patients with heart failure were eligible. Patients with a CONUT score ≥2 are grouped as malnourished. Predictive values of the CONUT score were summarized by pooling the multivariable-adjusted risk ratios (RR) with 95 % CI for the malnourished v. normal nutritional status or per point CONUT score increase. Participants: Ten studies involving 5196 patients with heart failure. Results: Malnourished patients with heart failure conferred a higher risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1·92; 95 % CI 1·58, 2·34) compared with the normal nutritional status. Subgroup analysis showed the malnourished patients with heart failure had an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (RR 1·78; 95 % CI 1·29, 2·46) and follow-up mortality (RR 2·01; 95 % CI 1·58, 2·57). Moreover, per point increase in CONUT score significantly increased 16% risk of all-cause mortality during the follow-up. Conclusions: Malnutrition defined by the CONUT score is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure. Assessment of nutritional status using CONUT score would be helpful for improving risk stratification of heart failure.

Twin peaks diversity with sacubitril/valsartan treatment responses in cardiomyopathic heart failure patients of non-ischemic compared to ischemic etiologies

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H.Y Chang ◽  
W.R Chiou ◽  
P.L Lin ◽  
C.Y Hsu ◽  
C.T Liao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Ventricular Remodeling ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
Twin Peaks ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) has been associated with increased mortality when compared with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) from several heart failure (HF) cohorts. Instead, PARADIGM study demonstrated similar event rates of cardiovascular (CV) death, all-cause mortality and HF readmissions between ICM and NICM patients. Although the beneficiary effect of sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL) compared to enalapril on these endpoints was consistent across etiologic categories, PARADIGM study did not analyze the effect of ventricular remodeling of SAC/VAL on patients with different HF etiologies, which may significantly affect treatment outcomes. Purpose We aim to compare alterations of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following SAC/VAL treatment and its association with clinical outcomes in patients with different HF etiologies. Methods Treatment with angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor for Taiwan heart failure patients (TAROT-HF) study is a multicenter study which enrolled 1552 patients with LVEF &lt;40%, whom had been on SAC/VAL treatment from 9 hospitals between 2017 and 2018. After excluding patients without having follow-up echocardiographic studies, patients were grouped by HF etiologies and by LVEF changes following treatment for 8-month period. LVEF improvement ≥15% was defined as “significant improvement”, 5–15% as “marginal improvement”, and &lt;5% or worse as “lack of improvement”. The primary endpoint was a composite of CV death or a first hospitalization for HF. Mean follow-up period was 726 days. Results A total of 1230 patients were analyzed. Patients with ICM were significantly older, more male, and prone to have associated hypertension and diabetes. On the other hand, patients with NICM had lower LVEF and higher likelihood of atrial fibrillation. LVEF increase was significantly greater in patients with NICM compared to those with ICM (11.2±12.4% vs. 6.9±9.8, p&lt;0.001). The effect of ventricular remodeling of SAC/VAL on patients with NICM showed twin peaks diversity (Significant improvement 37.1%, lack of improvement 42.3%), whereas in patients with ICM the proportions of significant, marginal and lack of improvement groups were 19.4%, 28.2% and 52.4%, respectively. The primary endpoint showed twin peaks diversity also in patients with NICM in line with LVEF changes: adjusted HR for patients with NICM and significant improvement was 0.41 (95% CI 0.29–0.57, p&lt;0.001), for patients with NICM and lack of improvement was 1.54 (95% CI 1.22–1.94, p&lt;0.001). Analyses for CV death, all-cause mortality, and HF readmission demonstrated consistent results. Conclusion Patients with NICM had higher degree of LVEF improvement than those with ICM following SAC/VAL treatment, and significant improvement of LVEF in NICM patients may indicate favorable outcome. NICM patients without response to SAC/VAL treatment should serve as an indicator for poor clinical outcome and warranted meticulous HF management. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Cheng Hsin General Hospital

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document