scholarly journals Apps to Support Self-Management for People With Hypertension: Content Analysis (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi Yan Hui ◽  
Emily Creamer ◽  
Hilary Pinnock ◽  
Brian McKinstry
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Mobile Apps ◽  
Blood Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Home Blood Pressure ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Dietary Advice ◽  
Management Support ◽  
App Development ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
User Ratings

BACKGROUND Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is one component of effective supported self-management, which may potentially be mediated by mobile apps. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to identify the self-management features (HBPM and broader support strategies) offered by currently available apps and to determine the features associated with download frequency and user ratings. METHODS We searched Google Play store, Apple App store, National Health Services Apps Library and myhealthapps.net (first search on February 1, 2018; updated August 18, 2018). We included high blood pressure apps available in the United Kingdom and extracted their features, number of downloads, and the average users’ rating from the app stores. We mapped the features to the holistic Practical Reviews In Self-Management Support (PRISMS) taxonomy of self-management support. We employed a regression analysis to determine if any features were associated with download frequency or user rating. RESULTS We included 151 apps. The 3 most common features were as follows: monitoring blood pressure (BP) and charting logs; lifestyle (exercise or dietary) advice; and providing information about hypertension. The other 11 components of the PRISMS taxonomy were rarely featured. There was little evidence to support associations between specific features and the download statistics and rating scores, with only 2 uncommon features achieving borderline significant associations. The presence of social support features, such as a forum, was weakly but significantly (R2=.04, P=.02) correlated with the number of downloads. Apps designed specifically for particular BP monitors/smart watches were weakly associated with a higher rating score (R2=.05, P<.001). Apps with more ratings were associated with more downloads (R2=.91, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS The functionality of currently available apps is limited to logging BP, offering lifestyle advice, and providing information about hypertension. Future app development should consider broadening the remit to produce a system that can respond flexibly to the diversity of support that enables people to self-manage their hypertension.

scholarly journals Mobile Apps for Blood Pressure Monitoring: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hussein Jamaladin ◽  
Tom H van de Belt ◽  
Lianda CH Luijpers ◽  
Falco R de Graaff ◽  
Sebastian JH Bredie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Mobile Apps ◽  
Blood Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Pressure Monitoring

BACKGROUND Using a mobile app for self-management could make it easier for patients to get insight into their blood pressure patterns. However, little is known about the availability, quality, and features of mobile apps targeting blood pressure. OBJECTIVE The goal of the research was to determine the availability, functionality, and quality of mobile apps that could be used for blood pressure monitoring purposes. METHODS A systematic app search was performed based on the standards for systematic reviews. We searched the Dutch official app stores for Android and iOS platforms using predefined keywords and included all English and Dutch mobile apps targeting blood pressure. Two independent assessors determined eligibility and quality of the apps using the 5-point Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). Quality scores of the apps with and without 17 a priori selected characteristics were compared using independent sample t tests. RESULTS A total of 184 apps (104 Android, 80 iOS) met the inclusion criteria. The mean overall MARS score was 2.63 (95% CI 2.55-2.71) for Android and 2.64 (95% CI 2.56-2.71) for iOS. The apps Bloeddruk (4.1) and AMICOMED BP (3.6) had the highest quality scores on the Android and iOS platforms, respectively. Of the app characteristics recorded, only pricing, in-app advertisements, and local data storage were not associated with the quality scores. In only 3.8% (7/184) of the apps, involvement of medical experts in its development was mentioned, whereas none of the apps was formally evaluated with results published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSIONS This study provides an overview of the best apps currently available in the app stores and important key features for self-management that can be used by health care providers and patients with hypertension to identify a suitable app targeting blood pressure monitoring. However, the majority of the apps targeting blood pressure monitoring were of poor quality. Therefore, it is important to involve medical experts in the developmental stage of health-related mobile apps to improve the quality of these apps.

Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Devices: Device Performance in an Alaska Native and American Indian Population

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (7-8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 40S-50S
Author(s):  
Krista R. Schaefer ◽  
Amber L. Fyfe-Johnson ◽  
Carolyn J. Noonan ◽  
Michael R. Todd ◽  
Jason G. Umans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
American Indian ◽  
Alaska Native ◽  
Blood Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Home Blood Pressure ◽  
Home Blood Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Calibration Models ◽  
American Indian People

Objectives: Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is an important component of blood pressure (BP) management. We assessed performance of two HBPM devices among Alaska Native and American Indian people (ANAIs). Methods: We measured BP using Omron BP786 arm cuff, Omron BP654 wrist cuff, and Baum aneroid sphygmomanometer in 100 ANAIs. Performance was assessed with intraclass correlation, paired t-tests, and calibration models. Results: Compared to sphygmomanometer, average BP was higher for wrist cuff (systolic = 4.8 mmHg and diastolic = 3.6 mmHg) and varied for arm cuff (systolic = −1.5 mmHg and diastolic = 2.5 mmHg). Calibration increased performance from grade B to A for arm cuff and from D to B for wrist cuff. Calibration increased false negatives and decreased false positives. Discussion: The arm HBPM device is more accurate than the wrist cuff among ANAIs with hypertension. Most patients are willing to use the arm cuff when accuracy is discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document