scholarly journals YouTube Videos as a Source of Information About Immunology for Medical Students: Cross-Sectional Study (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jef Van den Eynde ◽  
Alexander Crauwels ◽  
Philip Georg Demaerel ◽  
Lisa Van Eycken ◽  
Dominique Bullens ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND The use of the internet as a source of information has grown exponentially in the last decade. YouTube is currently the second most visited website and a major Web-based educational resource for medical students. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality, accuracy, and attractiveness of the information acquired from YouTube videos about 2 central concepts in immunology. METHODS YouTube videos posted before August 27, 2018 were searched using selected keywords related to either antigen presentation or immunoglobulin gene rearrangement. Video characteristics were recorded, and the Video Power Index (VPI) was calculated. Videos were assessed using 5 validated scoring systems: understandability and attractiveness, reliability, content and comprehensiveness, global quality score (GQS), and a subjective score. Videos were categorized by educational usefulness and by source. RESULTS A total of 82 videos about antigen presentation and 70 about immunoglobulin gene rearrangement were analyzed. Videos had a mean understandability and attractiveness score of 6.57/8 and 5.84/8, content and comprehensiveness score of 9.84/20 and 5.84/20, reliability score of 1.65/4 and 1.53/4, GQS of 3.38/5 and 2.76/5, and subjective score of 2.00/3 and 2.00/3, respectively. The organized channels group tended to have the highest VPI and GQS. CONCLUSIONS YouTube can provide medical students with some useful information about immunology, although content wise it cannot substitute textbooks and academic courses. Students and teachers should be aware of the educational quality of available videos if they intend to use them in the context of blended learning.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayman G. Mustafa ◽  
Nour R. Taha ◽  
Othman A. Alshboul ◽  
Mohammad Alsalem ◽  
Mohammed I. Malki

Purpose. The study is aimed at exploring the popularity, impact, and usefulness of using YouTube in learning anatomy as perceived by Jordanian medical students studying at Jordan University of Science and Technology. Methods. The present work is a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. First-, second-, and third-year medical students were invited to complete an anonymous questionnaire. Students’ responses were numerically coded, and the results were analyzed to reveal any statistically significant differences related to gender or level of study. Results. The results showed that 96.4% of the students used YouTube in general, 91.2% used it as a source of information, and 83.9% used YouTube as a learning tool in medical school. Further, YouTube was used by 79.1% of the students as an anatomy-learning tool. Most of these students used this platform in learning gross anatomy. The study also revealed that dissection videos were the most viewed anatomy-related content. Regarding the perceived value of YouTube as an anatomy-learning tool, the majority of the students reported that YouTube offered them useful anatomical information and enhanced their understanding, memorization, and recall of anatomical information. In addition, most of them recommended using YouTube as an anatomy-learning tool. Statistical analysis of the results revealed the presence of gender-related significant differences in students’ perspectives. Such differences were also found among students of different levels of study. Conclusion. Medical students have positive attitudes toward using YouTube in augmenting their anatomy learning. For this, educators are encouraged to adopt YouTube as an educational tool in their anatomy instruction and to create new anatomy-related YouTube videos to enhance their students’ learning.


10.2196/12605 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e12605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jef Van den Eynde ◽  
Alexander Crauwels ◽  
Philip Georg Demaerel ◽  
Lisa Van Eycken ◽  
Dominique Bullens ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 647-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianzhu Chen ◽  
Mary Trounstine ◽  
Frederick W. Alt ◽  
Faith Young ◽  
Carole Kurahara ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 176-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabina Signoretti ◽  
Michael Murphy ◽  
Pietro Puddu ◽  
John F. DeCoteau ◽  
Tullio Faraggiana ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rithvik Reddy ◽  
Horace Cheng ◽  
Nicholas Jufas ◽  
Nirmal Patel

Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess quality of the most popular cholesteatoma videos on YouTube using recognized scoring systems and to determine if video quality metrics correlated with video popularity based on likes and views Design: Cross sectional survey of available data Setting: Metadata acquisition using YouTube searches using Australian IP addresses Participants: Three independent neuro-otologists partaking in scoring videos Main outcome measures: Each video was viewed and scored by three independent assessors using both a novel tool to score the usefulness of the video as well as the validated DISCERN scoring tool. Popularity metrics were analyzed and compared to video popularity. Results: A total of 90 YouTube videos were analyzed with an average 55,292 views per video with an average of 271 likes and 22 dislikes. The inter-rater correlation was moderate with Fleiss-kappa score 0.42 [P < 0.01] using a novel scoring tool for cholesteatoma and inter-rater correlation coefficient was 0.78 [95% CI = 0.58 - 0.90] indicating good reliability for DISCERN scores. The overall video quality was poor with higher DISCERN scores found in videos uploaded from Academic Institutions. Conclusions: Informative video quality on YouTube on cholesteatoma is overall of poor quality. Videos with unclassified sources or more dislikes correlated poorly with video quality. Given the increase in patients turning to the internet for information regarding their health conditions, otology and otolaryngology societies should be encouraged to publish high quality YouTube videos on cholesteatoma and other ear conditions.


Blood ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 689-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Mirro ◽  
G Kitchingman ◽  
D Williams ◽  
GJ Lauzon ◽  
CC Lin ◽  
...  

Abstract This report describes the clinical and laboratory features of seven cases of acute leukemia associated with the 4;11 chromosomal translocation. All seven children had acute lymphoblastic leukemia by standard morphologic and cytochemical criteria. Leukemic blasts from six of seven patients were terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase- positive. Immunologic phenotyping suggested the leukemias were of B cell origin; blasts from five patients expressed HLA-DR and p24 (CD-9 antibody), blasts from three patients expressed B4 (CD-19), and blasts from two patients expressed the common acute lymphoblastic leukemia antigen (CD-10). One patient's leukemic blasts contained cytoplasmic immunoglobulin. Analysis of DNA from four of five patients demonstrated additional evidence of B cell differentiation with heavy-chain immunoglobulin gene rearrangement. When DNA from the four patients with heavy-chain immunoglobulin gene rearrangement was analyzed, one patient's DNA demonstrated light-chain immunoglobulin gene rearrangement. However, flow cytometric analysis of blasts from three patients showed the simultaneous expression of the lymphoid-associated antigen B4 (CD-19) and the myeloid-associated antigen My-1 (X-Hapten). Electron microscopic examination of blasts from one patient that expressed both lymphoid- and myeloid-associated antigens demonstrated ultrastructural characteristics of both lineages. These findings suggest that acute leukemia with the t(4;11) abnormality has mixed lineage characteristics as a result of leukemogenesis in a multipotential progenitor cell or aberrant gene expression later in differentiation. Furthermore, serial analysis of karyotype, immunophenotype, and heavy-chain immunoglobulin genes revealed changes in these biologic markers over time, suggesting continued chromosome rearrangement and gene modulation after the leukemogenic event in cells with the t(4;11).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document