scholarly journals Sustainable Adoption of Digital Health Innovations: Perspectives From a Stakeholder Workshop (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Helena Van Velthoven ◽  
Carlos Cordon
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Health Care Spending ◽  
Patient Centeredness ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Health Innovations ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Stakeholder Workshop

BACKGROUND There are various complex reasons that influence sustainable adoption of innovations in health care systems. Low adoption can be caused by a lack of support from one or more stakeholders because their needs and expectations are not always considered or aligned. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify stakeholders’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators toward the sustainable adoption of digital health innovations. METHODS A stakeholder workshop was attended by 12 participants with a range of backgrounds on August 25, 2017, including people representing the views from patients, carers, local hospitals, pharmacy retailers, health insurers, health services researchers, engineers, and technology and pharmaceutical companies in Switzerland. On the basis of adoption of innovation frameworks, we asked participants to interview each other about 3 factors influencing the adoption of digitally delivered health interventions: (1) Facilitators and barriers in the external system, (2) Needs and expectations of stakeholders, and (3) Safety, quality, and usability of innovations. The worksheets and videos generated from the workshop were qualitatively analyzed and summarized. RESULTS Facilitators for adoption mentioned were high levels of income and education, and digital health is a high priority to stakeholders. Main common interests of different stakeholders were patient satisfaction and job protection. Health care spending was a misaligned interest: although some stakeholders were keen on spending more to obtain or provide the highest quality of care, others were focused on reducing health care spending to provide cost-effective services. Switzerland’s diversity and complexity, in terms of its organization with 26 cantons (administrative divisions), were barriers as these made it harder to ensure interoperability of interventions. A culture of innovation was considered a push factor, but adoption was inhibited by persistent paper-based systems, a fear of change, and unwillingness to share data. The sustainability of interventions can be promoted by making them patient-centered, meaning that patients should be involved throughout their development. CONCLUSIONS Promoting sustainable adoption of digital health remains challenging despite various push factors being in place. Barriers related to fragmentation, patient-centeredness, data security, privacy, trust, and job security need to be addressed. A strength is that people from a wide range of backgrounds attended the workshop. A limitation is that the findings are focused on the macro level. In-depth case studies of specific issues need to be conducted in different settings.

scholarly journals What Do Patients Complain About Online: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy Framework Based on Patient Centeredness (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Liu ◽  
Shengchao Hou ◽  
Richard Evans ◽  
Chenxi Xia ◽  
Weidong Xia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Patient Experiences ◽  
Study Patient ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Centeredness ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Wide Range

BACKGROUND Complaints made online by patients about their health care experiences are becoming prevalent because of widespread worldwide internet connectivity. An a priori framework, based on patient centeredness, may be useful in identifying the types of issues patients complain about online across multiple settings. It may also assist in examining whether the determinants of patient-centered care (PCC) mirror the determinants of patient experiences. OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to develop a taxonomy framework for patient complaints online based on patient centeredness and to examine whether the determinants of PCC mirror the determinants of patient experiences. METHODS First, the best fit framework synthesis technique was applied to develop the proposed a priori framework. Second, electronic databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, were searched for articles published between 2000 and June 2018. Studies were only included if they collected primary quantitative data on patients’ online complaints. Third, a deductive and inductive thematic analysis approach was adopted to code the themes of recognized complaints into the framework. RESULTS In total, 17 studies from 5 countries were included in this study. Patient complaint online taxonomies and theme terms varied. According to our framework, patients expressed most dissatisfaction with patient-centered processes (101,586/204,363, 49.71%), followed by prerequisites (appropriate skills and knowledge of physicians; 50,563, 24.74%) and the care environment (48,563/204,363, 23.76%). The least dissatisfied theme was expected outcomes (3651/204,363, 1.79%). People expressed little dissatisfaction with expanded PCC dimensions, such as involvement of family and friends (591/204,363, 0.29%). Variation in the concerns across different countries’ patients were also observed. CONCLUSIONS Online complaints made by patients are of major value to health care providers, regulatory bodies, and patients themselves. Our PCC framework can be applied to analyze them under a wide range of conditions, treatments, and countries. This review has shown significant heterogeneity of patients’ online complaints across different countries.

scholarly journals The Financial And Cost Accounting Implications Of The Increased Role Of Advanced Nurse Practitioners In U.S. Healthcare

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Paul J. Carruth ◽  
Ann K. Carruth
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Reform ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Healthcare Reform ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
The United States ◽  
Highly Qualified ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Centered Care

On March 23, 2010, the Affordable Care Act became law. The need for healthcare reform was prompted by an imperative to reduce the relentless increase in spending on medical care in the United States. One approach to examining and solving the problem of escalating costs is to focus on applying proven principles of evidence-based practice and cost-effectiveness practices to find the least-expensive way to ensure clinical services of acceptable quality without sacrificing patient satisfaction. Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) have positioned themselves to serve an integral role in national health care reform. A successful transformation of the nation's health system will require utilization of all clinicians, including highly qualified APRNs, to provide cost- effective, accessible, patient-centered care. There is extensive, consistent evidence that nurse practitioners (NPs) provide care of equal or better quality at lower cost than comparable services provided by other qualified health professionals. However, current policies in many states prevent NPs from practicing within their full, legally defined scopes of practice. The Office of Technology Assessment's conclusions noted in 1981 that APRNs can be substituted for physicians in a significant portion of medical services with at least similar outcomes. Since then, numerous studies have supported that the care provided is equal to those provided by physicians for services within the overlapping scopes of licensed practice. This paper combines economic analysis with review of literature on health care reform initiatives to explore how the goals of healthcare reform can be accomplished by advanced nurse practitioners to provide their wide range of services directly to patients in a variety of clinical settings. 

scholarly journals What Do Patients Complain About Online: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy Framework Based on Patient Centeredness

10.2196/14634 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. e14634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Liu ◽  
Shengchao Hou ◽  
Richard Evans ◽  
Chenxi Xia ◽  
Weidong Xia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Patient Experiences ◽  
Study Patient ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Centeredness ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Wide Range

Background Complaints made online by patients about their health care experiences are becoming prevalent because of widespread worldwide internet connectivity. An a priori framework, based on patient centeredness, may be useful in identifying the types of issues patients complain about online across multiple settings. It may also assist in examining whether the determinants of patient-centered care (PCC) mirror the determinants of patient experiences. Objective The objective of our study was to develop a taxonomy framework for patient complaints online based on patient centeredness and to examine whether the determinants of PCC mirror the determinants of patient experiences. Methods First, the best fit framework synthesis technique was applied to develop the proposed a priori framework. Second, electronic databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, were searched for articles published between 2000 and June 2018. Studies were only included if they collected primary quantitative data on patients’ online complaints. Third, a deductive and inductive thematic analysis approach was adopted to code the themes of recognized complaints into the framework. Results In total, 17 studies from 5 countries were included in this study. Patient complaint online taxonomies and theme terms varied. According to our framework, patients expressed most dissatisfaction with patient-centered processes (101,586/204,363, 49.71%), followed by prerequisites (appropriate skills and knowledge of physicians; 50,563, 24.74%) and the care environment (48,563/204,363, 23.76%). The least dissatisfied theme was expected outcomes (3651/204,363, 1.79%). People expressed little dissatisfaction with expanded PCC dimensions, such as involvement of family and friends (591/204,363, 0.29%). Variation in the concerns across different countries’ patients were also observed. Conclusions Online complaints made by patients are of major value to health care providers, regulatory bodies, and patients themselves. Our PCC framework can be applied to analyze them under a wide range of conditions, treatments, and countries. This review has shown significant heterogeneity of patients’ online complaints across different countries.

scholarly journals A 2019. évi ARIA kezelési irányelvek magyar adaptációja és a hazai alkalmazás lehetőségei allergiás rhinitisben

2020 ◽  
Vol 161 (49) ◽  
pp. 2059-2071
Author(s):  
Helga Kraxner ◽  
Andor Hirschberg ◽  
Kristóf Nékám
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Mobile Health ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Allergic Diseases ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Sentinel Network ◽  
Intranasal Corticosteroids ◽  
Care Systems

Összefoglaló. Az allergiás betegségekben szenvedő emberek száma világszerte, köztük Magyarországon is növekszik. Az egészségügyi ellátórendszerek azon dolgoznak, hogy minél hatékonyabban tudják felhasználni a rendelkezésre álló forrásokat. Az Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) szervezet célja az allergiás náthában szenvedő betegek ellátásának javítása, szakmai ajánlások készítése, aktualizálása. Ennek egyik módja integrált betegellátási utak kidolgozása. Célunk ezek hazai elérhetővé tétele, az ajánlások széles körű elterjesztése az Európai Unió (EU) többi tagállamához hasonlóan Magyarországon is. Az ARIA más nemzetközi innovatív szervezetek bevonásával olyan integrált betegellátási utakat fejlesztett ki, amelyek allergiás nátha, esetleg társbetegsége, az asztma esetén támogatják a kezelést. Ezeket újgenerációs irányelvek kidolgozása útján alkották, amelyekhez felhasználták a mobiltechnológiából és pollenkamra-vizsgálatokból származó valós evidenciákat is. A gyógyszeres terápia optimalizálásához a vizuális analóg skálán alapuló, úgynevezett Mobil Légúti Figyelő Hálózat algoritmusát digitalizálták, és valós evidenciák felhasználásával tovább finomították. Allergén immunterápiára az ARIA a világon elsőként dolgozott ki integrált betegellátási utakat 2019-ben. A kezelési irányelvekhez való adherenciaszint alacsony, a betegek a tüneteik erőssége alapján módosítják a kezelést. A flutikazon-propionát–azelasztin kombináció hatása erősebb az intranasalis kortikoszteroidokénál, míg az utóbbi hatásosabb az oralis H1-antihisztaminoknál. A mobiltelefonokban tárolt elektronikus napló vagy más ’mobile health’ (mHealth) eszközök használata segíti a betegek kiválasztását allergén immunterápiára. Az ARIA által javasolt algoritmus megfelelőnek mutatkozott az allergiás rhinitis kezelésére, ezért ezek az irányelvek bekerülnek integrált betegellátási utakba, és részét fogják képezni az EU Egészségügyi és Élelmiszer-biztonsági Főigazgatósága digitalizált, személyközpontú gondozási anyagainak. Az allergén immunterápia hatékony az inhalatív allergének által okozott allergiás betegségekben, alkalmazását azonban korlátozni kell gondosan válogatott betegekre. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(49): 2059–2071. Summary. The number of allergic patients is increasing all over the world, also in Hungary. Delivering effective and cost-effective health care is essential for all health care systems. ARIA (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma) aims to improve the care of patients who suffer from allergic rhinitis by setting up guidelines and updating them. Development of ICPs (integrated care pathways) can play an essential role in attaining this goal. Our aim is to make ICP-s developed by ARIA available also in Hungary, as is already the case in other countries of the European Union (EU). Together with other international initiatives, ARIA has worked out digitally-enabled ICPs to support care in allergic rhinitis and comorbid asthma. ICPs are based on new-generation guidelines using RWE (real-world evidence) from chamber studies and mobile technology. The MASK (Mobile Airways Sentinel NetworK) algorithm – based on visual analogue scale – was digitalized to support pharmacotherapy, and was refined by using RWE. ARIA was the first to develop ICPs for allergen immunotherapy (AIT) in 2019. Based on MASK data, patients did not follow guidelines and their adherence to treatment was poor. Patients would modify their treatments, depending on the disease control. The effect of fluticasone propionate–azelastine combination is superior to intranasal corticosteroids which are superior to oral H1-antihistamines. Electronic diaries obtained from cell phones and other ’mobile health’ (mHealth) devices help select patients for AIT. The ARIA algorithm for AR was found appropriate and no change is necessary. These guidelines will inform ICPs and will be included in the DG Santé digitally-enabled, person-centred care system. AIT is an effective treatment for allergic diseases caused by inhaled allergens. Its use should, however, be restricted to carefully selected patients. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(49): 2059–2071.

Emergency Telehealth Services in the Correctional Setting

2021 ◽  
pp. 210-221
Author(s):  
Newton E. Kendig ◽  
David G. Ellis ◽  
Renoj Varughese ◽  
Obinna M. Ome Irondi
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Emergency Services ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Correctional Setting ◽  
Correctional Health Care ◽  
Correctional Health ◽  
Care Systems

Millions of patients receive their primary health care in U.S. jails and prisons each year. Correctional health care systems frequently lack round-the-clock onsite physician services, and access to local hospital-based emergency services may be limited. Increasingly, correctional health care systems are relying on telehealth capabilities to improve their access to subspecialty services. Emergency telehealth services, however, are largely underutilized. Available reports suggest that emergency telehealth services can reduce outside medical trips and prove cost-effective in certain settings. Successful emergency telehealth programs emphasize the importance of a thorough diagnostic evaluation, effective communication with local correctional health care providers, and strategic use of point-of-care testing. This chapter provides practical recommendations for the telehealth evaluation and management of commonly occurring medical emergencies in the correctional setting.

Organizing a diabetes service

2011 ◽  
pp. 2005-2011
Author(s):  
Stephen C. L. Gough
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Health Care Need ◽  
Delivery Of Care ◽  
Strategic Approach ◽  
Effective Manner ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Uk

The increasing worldwide incidence and prevalence of diabetes is placing substantial pressures on health care systems and economies. As a consequence individuals involved in the care of people with diabetes are looking at services currently being provided and examining ways in which care can be organized in the most cost-effective manner. Whilst the degree to which diabetes care is delivered differs from country to country, similar fundamental questions are being asked by those involved in the delivery of care, including: What are we currently providing? What do we need to provide? What are we able to provide? Although the answers to these questions are quite different not just between countries but often within specific localities within a country, the ultimate aim is the same: to provide the best possible care to as many people with diabetes as possible. The global diversity of diabetes health care need is enormous and while the solutions will be equally diverse, the approach to the development of a diabetes service will, for many organizations, be similar. The main focus of this chapter is based upon the model or the strategic approach developed in the UK, but many of the individual component parts are present in most health care settings.

Toward More Patient-Centered and Prevention-Oriented Oral Health Care

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Leggett ◽  
D. Duijster ◽  
G.V.A. Douglas ◽  
K. Eaton ◽  
G.J.M.G. van der Heijden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Disease Prevention ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Oral Care ◽  
Oral Health Care ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
European Union Member States

ADVOCATE (Added Value for Oral Care) is a project funded by the European Commission’s Horizon 2020 program, which aims to develop strategies for a system transition toward more patient-centered and prevention-oriented oral health care delivery within health care systems. This system should balance the restorative and preventive approaches in dental and oral health care. ADVOCATE is a partnership among 6 European Union member states, which involves collaboration among universities, state-funded health care providers, and private insurance companies in Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and Aridhia, a biomedical informatics company based in Scotland. There are 6 interrelated work packages, which aim to address the following objectives: 1) in-depth evaluation of oral health care systems in European Union member states to identify best system designs for oral disease prevention, 2) development of a set of measures to provide information on oral care delivery and oral health outcomes, 3) evaluation of a feedback approach in dental practice that aims to facilitate a change toward preventive oral health care delivery, and 4) economic evaluation of strategies to promote preventive oral health care and development of policy recommendations for oral health care systems. The project is novel in its use of data that are routinely collected by health insurance organizations, as well as the engagement of key stakeholders from dental teams, insurers, patients, and policy makers in guiding the development and progress of the project. This article outlines in detail the objectives and research methodology of the ADVOCATE project and its anticipated impact. Knowledge Transfer Statement: This commentary describes the development of policy options to promote a greater focus on disease prevention in general dental practice. The approach builds on identifying the comparative effectiveness of alternative incentive schemes, as well as methods to monitor clinical and patient-derived measures of success in creating health for patients. The article describes the development and application of the measures and the evaluation of their success in orienting clinical practice more toward disease prevention.

scholarly journals A Consensus-Based Set of Measures for Oral Health Care

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (8) ◽  
pp. 881-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Baâdoudi ◽  
A. Trescher ◽  
D. Duijster ◽  
N. Maskrey ◽  
F. Gabel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Routine Data ◽  
Oral Health Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Dental Practitioners ◽  
Care Systems

Increasingly more responsive and accountable health care systems are demanded, which is characterized by transparency and explicit demonstration of competence by health care providers and the systems in which they work. This study aimed to establish measures of oral health for transparent and explicit reporting of routine data to facilitate more patient-centered and prevention-oriented oral health care. To accomplish this, an intermediate objective was to develop a comprehensive list of topics that a range of stakeholders would perceive as valid, important, and relevant for describing oral health and oral health care. A 4-stage approach was used to develop the list of topics: 1) scoping of literature and its appraisal, 2) a meeting of experts, 3) a 2-stage Delphi process (online), and 4) a World Café discussion. The aim was to create consensus through structured conversations via a range of stakeholders (general dental practitioners, patients, insurers, and policy makers) from the Netherlands, Germany, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Hungary, and Denmark. The study was part of the ADVOCATE project, and it resulted in a list of 48 topics grouped into 6 clusters: 1) access to dental care, 2) symptoms and diagnosis, 3) health behaviors, 4) oral treatments, 5) oral prevention, and 6) patient perception. All topics can be measured, as they all have a data source with defined numerators and denominators. This study is the first to establish a comprehensive and multiple-stakeholder consented topic list designed for guiding the implementation of transparent and explicit measurement of routine data of oral health and oral health care. Successful measurement within oral health care systems is essential to facilitate learning from variation in practice and outcomes within and among systems, and it potentiates improvement toward more patient-centered and prevention-oriented oral health care.

Comparatively Ineffective? PCORI and the Uphill Battle to Make Evidence Count in US Medicine

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 787-800
Author(s):  
Eric M. Patashnik
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Affordable Care Act ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cultural Barriers ◽  
Health Care Spending ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Medical Evidence ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
The Us ◽  
Based Medicine

Abstract The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) was established as part of the Affordable Care Act to promote research on the comparative effectiveness of treatment options. Advocates hoped this information would help reduce wasteful spending by identifying low-value treatments, but many conservatives and industry groups feared PCORI would ration care and threaten physicians' autonomy. PCORI faced three challenges during its first decade of operation: overcoming the controversy of its birth and escaping early termination, shaping medical practice, and building a public reputation for relevance. While PCORI has won reauthorization, it has not yet had a major impact on the decisions of clinicians or payers. PCORI's modest footprint reflects not only the challenges of getting a new organization off the ground but also the larger political, financial, and cultural barriers to the uptake of medical evidence in the US health care system. The growing attention among policymakers and researchers to provider prices (rather than utilization) as the driver of health care spending could be helpful to the political prospects of the evidence-based medicine project by making it appear to be less as rationing driven by costs and more as an effort to improve quality and uphold medical professionalism.

scholarly journals PATIENT-CENTERED MEDICINE: BACKGROUND TO THE TRANSFORMATION AND COMPONENTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Khalfin ◽  
V. V. Madyanova ◽  
O. E. Kachkova ◽  
I. D. Demina ◽  
T. I. Krishtaleva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
Patient Centered Medicine ◽  
Quality Of Medical Care

Purpose of the study. To analyze the concept of creating patient-oriented medicine, the prerequisites for its emergence, the difficulties of introducing it into existing health systems based on foreign experience. Materials and methods. The main materials of the study were used sources of foreign literature, which presents the concept of patient-oriented medicine, analyzed the prerequisites for changing models of health care in the European Union, USA and Asia in accordance with the principles of patient-oriented medicine, as well as data on the components and levels of patient-oriented medicine in foreign countries Results. The analyzed literature quite fully describes the difficulties of introducing patient-oriented medicine into existing health care systems. Particular attention should be paid to a multidisciplinary approach, continuity at different levels of medical care and effective communication between the physician and the patient towards the integration of this model into clinical practice. The analysis of the availability of medical care in developed countries and its dependence on social status, ethnicity and disease of the patient. Conclusion. Patient-oriented medicine is a new model for planning, implementing and evaluating medical services, which is based on mutually beneficial partnerships between medical workers, patients and their families. Taking into account the current problems of domestic health care, the introduction of the patient-oriented model will significantly improve the quality of medical care provided to the population of our country. Globally, the implementation of the principles of this model is far from complete. In the Russian Federation, targeted work in this direction requires additional scientific research, systematization of available data, and development of new legal documents

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document