scholarly journals Health Care Cost Analyses for Exploring Cost Savings Opportunities in Older Patients: Longitudinal Retrospective Study (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Agboola ◽  
Mariana Simons ◽  
Sara Golas ◽  
Jorn op den Buijs ◽  
Jennifer Felsted ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Costs ◽  
Annual Cost ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Health Care Organizations ◽  
Health Care Cost ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Study Population ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Care Costs

BACKGROUND Half of Medicare reimbursement goes toward caring for the top 5% of the most expensive patients. However, little is known about these patients prior to reaching the top or how their costs change annually. To address these gaps, we analyzed patient flow and associated health care cost trends over 5 years. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost of health care utilization in older patients by analyzing changes in their long-term expenditures. METHODS This was a retrospective, longitudinal, multicenter study to evaluate health care costs of 2643 older patients from 2011 to 2015. All patients had at least one episode of home health care during the study period and used a personal emergency response service (PERS) at home for any length of time during the observation period. We segmented all patients into top (5%), middle (6%-50%), and bottom (51%-100%) segments by their annual expenditures and built cost pyramids based thereon. The longitudinal health care expenditure trends of the complete study population and each segment were assessed by linear regression models. Patient flows throughout the segments of the cost acuity pyramids from year to year were modeled by Markov chains. RESULTS Total health care costs of the study population nearly doubled from US $17.7M in 2011 to US $33.0M in 2015 with an expected annual cost increase of US $3.6M (P=.003). This growth was primarily driven by a significantly higher cost increases in the middle segment (US $2.3M, P=.003). The expected annual cost increases in the top and bottom segments were US $1.2M (P=.008) and US $0.1M (P=.004), respectively. Patient and cost flow analyses showed that 18% of patients moved up the cost acuity pyramid yearly, and their costs increased by 672%. This was in contrast to 22% of patients that moved down with a cost decrease of 86%. The remaining 60% of patients stayed in the same segment from year to year, though their costs also increased by 18%. CONCLUSIONS Although many health care organizations target intensive and costly interventions to their most expensive patients, this analysis unveiled potential cost savings opportunities by managing the patients in the lower cost segments that are at risk of moving up the cost acuity pyramid. To achieve this, data analytics integrating longitudinal data from electronic health records and home monitoring devices may help health care organizations optimize resources by enabling clinicians to proactively manage patients in their home or community environments beyond institutional settings and 30- and 60-day telehealth services.

scholarly journals THU0548 THE ECONOMIC BURDEN OF ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS IN SPAIN. RESULTS OF THE SPANISH ATLAS 2017

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 514.2-514
Author(s):  
M. Merino ◽  
O. Braçe ◽  
A. González ◽  
Á. Hidalgo-Vega ◽  
M. Garrido-Cumbrera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Health Care Costs ◽  
Health Care Cost ◽  
Labour Productivity ◽  
General Health Questionnaire ◽  
Indirect Costs ◽  
Productivity Losses ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Care Costs

Background:Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is a disease associated with a high number of comorbidities, chronic pain, functional disability, and resource consumption.Objectives:This study aimed to estimate the burden of disease for patients diagnosed with AS in Spain.Methods:Data from 578 unselected patients with AS were collected in 2016 for the Spanish Atlas of Axial Spondyloarthritis via an online survey. The estimated costs were: Direct Health Care Costs (borne by the National Health System, NHS) and Direct Non-Health Care Costs (borne by patients) were estimated with the bottom-up method, multiplying the resource consumption by the unit price of each resource. Indirect Costs (labour productivity losses) were estimated using the human capital method. Costs were compared between levels of disease activity using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score (<4 or low inflammation versus ≥4 or high inflammation) and risk of mental distress using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) score (<3 or low risk versus ≥3 or high risk).Results:The average annual cost per patient with AS in 2015 amounted to €11,462.3 (± 13,745.5) per patient. Direct Health Care Cost meant an annual average of €6,999.8 (± 9,216.8) per patient, to which an annual average of €611.3 (± 1,276.5) per patient associated with Direct Non-Health Care Cost borne by patients must be added. Pharmacological treatment accounted for the largest percentage of the costs borne by the NHS (64.6%), while for patients most of the cost was attributed to rehabilitative therapies and/or physical activity (91%). The average annual Indirect Costs derived from labour productivity losses were €3,851.2 (± 8,484.0) per patient, mainly associated to absenteeism. All categories showed statistically significant differences (p<0.05) between BASDAI groups (<4 vs ≥4) except for the Direct Non-Healthcare Cost, showing a progressive rise in cost from low to high inflammation. Regarding the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), all categories showed statistically significant differences between GHQ-12 (<3 vs ≥3), with higher costs associated with higher risk of poor mental health (Table 1).Table 1.Average annual costs per patient according to BASDAI and GHQ-12 groups (in Euros, 2015)NDirect Health CostsDirect Non-Health CostsIndirect CostsTotal CostBASDAI<4917,592.0*557.32,426.5*10,575.8*≥43769,706.9*768.05,104.8*15,579.7*Psychological distress (GHQ-12)<31468,146.8*493.6*3,927.2*12,567.6*≥32609,772.9*807.2*4,512.3*15,092.5*Total5786,999.8611.33,851.211,462.3* p <0.05Conclusion:Direct Health Care Costs, and those attributed to pharmacological treatment in particular, accounted for the largest component of the cost associated with AS. However, a significant proportion of the overall costs can be further attributed to labour productivity losses.Acknowledgments:Funded by Novartis Farmacéutica S.A.Disclosure of Interests:María Merino: None declared, Olta Braçe: None declared, Almudena González: None declared, Álvaro Hidalgo-Vega: None declared, Marco Garrido-Cumbrera: None declared, Jordi Gratacos-Masmitja Grant/research support from: a grant from Pfizzer to study implementation of multidisciplinary units to manage PSA in SPAIN, Consultant of: Pfizzer, MSD, ABBVIE, Janssen, Amgen, BMS, Novartis, Lilly, Speakers bureau: Pfizzer, MSD, ABBVIE, Janssen, Amgen, BMS, Novartis, Lilly

scholarly journals Economic aspects of skin cancer management in Eastern Croatia

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-52
Author(s):  
Ivan Miškulin ◽  
Želimir Orkić ◽  
Maja Miškulin
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Health Care Costs ◽  
Annual Cost ◽  
County Level ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
Prevention Campaign ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Care Costs

Introduction: In the past several decades there has been a substantial increase in the incidence of skin cancers worldwide and Croatia is no exception. The aim of this study was to estimate the financial cost of skin cancer treatment in the Osijek-Baranja County from 2000 to 2009 and to compare it with the cost of a primary prevention campaign organized in the Baranja County.Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with skin cancer in the Baranja County and related health care costs. We designed a potential primary prevention campaign on a County level and calculated the financial expenses of campaign and then compared the results to health care costs from previous years.Results: The total cost of the treatment involving skin cancer (C43-C44) cases in the Osijek-Baranja County during the 2000-2009 periods was €483,710. The cost of a primary prevention campaign described in this study suggests that the estimated annual cost of a primary prevention campaign on the County level makes around 5.9% of the annual cost of all the medical treatment involving skin cancer patients in the County, which shows that a planned preventive approach towards the issue of skin cancer in Eastern Croatia is extremely justified and reasonable.Conclusion: The present study reveals the urgent need for the implementation of a primary prevention campaign in Eastern Croatia and puts emphasis on the economic potential of such an approach towards the problem of skin cancer. 

scholarly journals Maximizing Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations and Cost Savings Beyond Targeting the Most Costly Patients (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Simons ◽  
Sara Golas ◽  
Stephen Agboola ◽  
Jorn op den Buijs ◽  
Jennifer Felsted ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Health Care Organizations ◽  
Health Care Cost ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Potential Cost ◽  
Great Opportunity ◽  
Avoidable Hospitalizations

BACKGROUND Many health care organizations use value-based care strategies that include population health management programs and data analytics to stratify their population and identify high-risk and high-cost patients. Most of these programs target the top 5% most expensive patients. However, little is known about these patients prior to reaching the top 5% of cost, or how their characteristics change over time. To address these gaps, we analyzed the differences in characteristics of patients from 3 different cost segments over 5 years (2011-2015). OBJECTIVE To evaluate potentially avoidable hospitalizations and associated savings in the health care cost of older patients using Personal Emergency Response Service (PERS). METHODS We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal, multicenter study to evaluate potentially avoidable hospitalizations of 2643 older patients over 5 years (2011-2015). All patients had at least one inpatient and/or outpatient encounter, and at least one episode of home health care during the study period. Additionally, all patients used PERS at home anytime during the study period. We ranked patients by their annual health care cost and then grouped them into the following segments for each respective year: T-segment constitutes the top 5% most expensive patients; M-segment comprises the middle 45% of patients; B-segment includes the bottom 50% least expensive patients. We then evaluated differences in the characteristics of patients in the B-, M- and T-cost segments in each study year. Continuous variables were compared by t test (two-tailed) for normally distributed variables and Kruskal-Wallis Rank Sum test for skewed variables. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables. RESULTS The three cost segments differed significantly each year (P<.05) with respect to: demographics (age, education), PERS utilization (Incidents, ER transport), health care utilization (hospitalizations, length of stay, 30-, 90-, and 180-day readmissions, outpatient encounters) and medical conditions (number of conditions, Charlson Comorbidity Index). Further, we analyzed the number of potentially avoidable hospitalizations (as defined by CMS) and associated cost savings in each segment. All hospitalizations occurred among patients in the T- and M-segments while the B-segment was hospitalization-free each year. The percentage of avoidable hospitalizations in the M-segment compared with the T-segment was 3 times greater (75% vs 25%, P<.001). While the potential cost saving from avoidable hospitalizations in the entire population increased from $3.0M to $8.2M (2011-2015), the majority of these cost savings were in the M-segment compared with the T-segment (60% vs 40%, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS Although many health care organizations target intensive and costly interventions to their most expensive patients, this analysis suggests there is untapped potential to control costs and improve care beyond focusing on the highest cost patients. Namely, targeting patients in the middle cost segment may offer great opportunity for population management programs to maximize both potentially avoidable hospitalizations and cost savings.

scholarly journals Health Care Costs and Savings Associated with Increased Dairy Consumption among Adults in the United States

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn G. Scrafford ◽  
Xiaoyu Bi ◽  
Jasjit K. Multani ◽  
Mary M. Murphy ◽  
Jordana K. Schmier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Costs ◽  
Annual Cost ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Dairy Consumption ◽  
The Us ◽  
Care Costs

Background: The purpose of this study is to estimate the impact on health care costs if United States (US) adults increased their dairy consumption to meet Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) recommendations. Methods: Risk estimates from recent meta-analyses quantifying the association between dairy consumption and health outcomes were combined with the increase in dairy consumption under two scenarios where population mean dairy intakes from the 2015–2016 What We Eat in America were increased to meet the DGA recommendations: (1) according to proportions by type as specified in US Department of Agriculture Food Intake Patterns and (2) assuming the consumption of a single dairy type. The resulting change in risk was combined with published data on annual health care costs to estimate impact on costs. Health care costs were adjusted to account for potential double counting due to overlapping comorbidities of the health outcomes included. Results: Total dairy consumption among adults in the US was 1.49 cup-equivalents per day (c-eq/day), requiring an increase of 1.51 c-eq/day to meet the DGA recommendation. Annual cost savings of $12.5 billion (B) (range of $2.0B to $25.6B) were estimated based on total dairy consumption resulting from a reduction in stroke, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and colorectal cancer and an increased risk of Parkinson’s disease and prostate cancer. Similar annual cost savings were estimated for an increase in low-fat dairy consumption ($14.1B; range of $0.8B to $27.9B). Among dairy sub-types, an increase of approximately 0.5 c-eq/day of yogurt consumption alone to help meet the DGA recommendations resulted in the highest annual cost savings of $32.5B (range of $16.5B to $52.8B), mostly driven by a reduction in type 2 diabetes. Conclusions: Adoption of a dietary pattern with increased dairy consumption among adults in the US to meet DGA recommendations has the potential to provide billions of dollars in savings.

Abstract TMP8: The New Alteplase Package Insert: What is the Potential Impact?

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Harn Shiue ◽  
Karen Albright ◽  
Kara Sands ◽  
April Sisson ◽  
Michael Lyerly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Health Care Costs ◽  
Lifetime Cost ◽  
Package Insert ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
History Of ◽  
Potential Impact ◽  
Care Costs

Background: Alteplase (tPA) contraindications for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) were originally derived from the 1995 NINDS trial. Recently, a history of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and recent stroke (within 3 months) were removed as contraindications from the drug package insert, which could increase the number of patients eligible for IV thrombolysis. We sought to define the potential impact on outcomes and health care costs in this newly eligible population. Methods: Consecutive patients (March 2014 - April 2015) who presented with AIS to our Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC) were retrospectively analyzed. Demographics and tPA exclusions were recorded. The annual number of discharges with primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke in the U.S. was estimated from the National Inpatient Sample (2006 - 2011). A previously reported value of $25,000/patient was utilized to calculate lifetime cost savings in patients receiving tPA. Results: During the study period, 776 AIS were admitted to our CSC (median age 64; 55,74, 51% men, 62% white). Seventy-six percent of our patients (n=590) had ≥1 tPA exclusions according to the NINDS trial. Among these patients, 11 excluded had history of ICH, 15 with recent strokes, and 1 both. Following the new package insert, the proportion of patients with ≥1 tPA exclusion fell to 73% (n=563). Given the 432,000 ischemic stroke discharges annually, a 3% increase in patients eligible for tPA could translate to treatment of 12,960 more patients annually and a lifetime cost savings of $324,000,000. Furthermore, we estimate that 1,685 of these newly eligible patients will experience a favorable functional outcome based on the results of the NINDS trial (13% shift analysis for mRS 0-1). Conclusions: Our results suggest that the new tPA package insert has the potential to increase national tPA treatment rates, decrease U.S. health care costs, and improve functional outcomes in eligible AIS patients. National guidelines need to be updated to reflect these changes.

What's Cheaper Than Pediatric Care?

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 772-772
Author(s):  
Richard M. Narkewicz
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Child Care ◽  
Health Care Costs ◽  
Pediatric Care ◽  
Continuing Care ◽  
Well Child Care ◽  
Fee Structure ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Care Costs

In these days of rising health care costs, the finger has been pointed at physicians as the cause of these increases. Because of these charges each physician should look critically at his own fee structure and try to compare it with other commodities in today's budgets. I have done just that. In totaling the cost of complete well-child care for a child and continuing care through the age of 20 years, I was surprised to find that in the present fee structure it costs a family $464.25.

Consumer Cost-Sharing as a Means to Reduce Health Care Costs

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-170
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Davidson ◽  
John P. Connelly ◽  
R. Don Blim ◽  
James E. Strain ◽  
H. Doyl Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Costs ◽  
Cost Sharing ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
National Commission ◽  
Insurance Policies ◽  
National Medical ◽  
Use Of Services ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Care Costs

The National Commission on the Cost of Medical Care1 states in part (Recommendation 2) that "insurance policies should include provisions through which the consumer shares in the cost of care received, at the time of service, for selected benefits and for selected groups...." These cost-sharing provisions are expected to reduce national medical care expenditures by encouraging consumers to reduce their use of services in order to avoid paying additional money out of their own pockets. They will thus moderate the demand-inducing tendency of insurance, leading the rational consumer to seek only necessary services and to forego those services contributing to what is believed to be over-utilization. As the Commission states in its supporting statement:

scholarly journals A unique partnership between a health system’s insurance plan and the Integrative Medicine Department benefits patients and helps control costs

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Maureen M Anderson ◽  
Karen Armstrong ◽  
Katherine Nori Janosz ◽  
Michael Tocco ◽  
Nancy A DeVore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Integrative Medicine ◽  
Health Care Costs ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Insurance Plan ◽  
Effective Care ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Care Costs

Health care costs continue to increase, affecting patients and insurance providers. Complementary health approaches are increasingly used to augment traditional medicine, and integrative medicine (IM) incorporates these complementary approaches into traditional patient care. The IM Department was established in our institution in 2004 and now offers a wide range of services to patients. Our institution offers health care coverage to all benefit-eligible hospital personnel and their eligible dependents. The use of IM has had a surprising and beneficial effect on the health care costs of this small, self-insured health plan. We found that the coverage of certain IM modalities for specific conditions had positive clinical results and resulted in significant cost savings to the insurance plan. At the same time, this partnership supports patients by providing appropriate and effective care, and we have seen success in terms of patient recovery and patient satisfaction. Here, we present the history of the relationship between the insurance plan and the IM Department, how the coverage of IM modalities has expanded, and the current practice at our institution. We demonstrate that this innovative relationship has benefitted patients and resulted in cost-savings for the insurance provider. Therefore, this partnership will continue to expand, thus providing patients with a wide range of treatment options and effective care.

Health care costs of physical inactivity in Canadian adults

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 803-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Janssen
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Costs ◽  
Physical Inactivity ◽  
Health Care Cost ◽  
Care Costs

The purpose of this study was to provide a contemporary estimate of the health care cost of physical inactivity in Canadian adults. The health care cost was estimated using a prevalence-based approach. The estimated direct, indirect, and total health care costs of physical inactivity in Canada in 2009 were $2.4 billion, $4.3 billion, and $6.8 billion, respectively. These values represented 3.8%, 3.6%, and 3.7% of the overall health care costs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document